Suppr超能文献

如何加强公共卫生与初级保健之间的合作?荷兰在七个社区开展的多案例研究。

How can collaboration be strengthened between public health and primary care? A Dutch multiple case study in seven neighbourhoods.

作者信息

Storm Ilse, van Gestel Anke, van de Goor Ien, van Oers Hans

机构信息

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Health and Society, PO Box 1, 3720, BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Regional Public Health Service Brabant-Zuidoost, PO 8684, 5605, KR, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 28;15:974. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2307-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although public health and primary care share the goal of promoting the health and wellbeing of the public, the two health sectors find it difficult to develop mutually integrated plans and to collaborate with each other. The aim of this multiple case study was to compare seven neighbourhoods in which a stepwise approach based on two central tools (district health profile and policy dialogue) was used to develop integrated district plans and promote collaboration.

METHODS

The stepwise approach involved the following steps: 1 Getting to know the neighbourhood, 2 Assembling the workgroup, 3 Analysing the neighbourhood, 4 Developing a district health profile, 5 Preparing policy dialogue, 6 Holding local dialogues, 7 Embedding integrated district plans and collaboration. To supervise this process, a core team was assembled for each neighbourhood, consisting of people drawn from both public health and primary care. Both the use of the two tools and the collaboration were studied by means of documentary analysis, interviews, questionnaires and observations.

RESULTS

The seven neighbourhoods differed in the way the two tools of the stepwise approach were used: general versus focused profiles, the actors involved, the aims of the dialogue or the intensity of the steps. There were also similarities: profile indicators (e.g., population prognosis, vulnerability) and dialogue themes (e.g., obesity, social cohesion). The local actors experienced that the combination of both tools facilitates the process of bringing public health and primary care closer together, and that it is essential to invest sufficiently in the integration of profile data and in involving appropriate actors in the dialogue (e.g., GPs, residents). Collaboration was perceived as positive (e.g., feels involved, focus on consensus), but a starting process. Local actors also believe that the stepwise approach supported the process.

CONCLUSION

A stepwise approach involving the combined use of district health profiles and policy dialogues promotes the integrated planning of health activities and facilitates collaboration between public health and primary care at the local level. Local differences may arise in the intensity and form of the various steps, but because they are practical and clearly defined, they remain transferrable to other neighbourhoods.

摘要

背景

尽管公共卫生和初级保健都以促进公众健康和福祉为目标,但这两个卫生部门发现难以制定相互整合的计划并相互协作。本多项案例研究的目的是比较七个社区,在这些社区中采用了基于两种核心工具(地区健康概况和政策对话)的逐步方法来制定综合地区计划并促进协作。

方法

逐步方法包括以下步骤:1. 了解社区;2. 组建工作组;3. 分析社区;4. 制定地区健康概况;5. 准备政策对话;6. 举行地方对话;7. 落实综合地区计划与协作。为监督这一过程,为每个社区组建了一个核心团队,成员来自公共卫生和初级保健领域。通过文献分析、访谈、问卷调查和观察等方式研究了这两种工具的使用情况以及协作情况。

结果

七个社区在逐步方法的两种工具的使用方式上存在差异:通用型与重点型概况、涉及的行为主体、对话目的或步骤的强度。也存在相似之处:概况指标(如人口预测、脆弱性)和对话主题(如肥胖、社会凝聚力)。地方行为主体体会到,两种工具的结合有助于拉近公共卫生和初级保健的距离,并且必须在整合概况数据以及让合适的行为主体参与对话(如全科医生、居民)方面进行充分投入。协作被视为积极的(如感到参与其中、注重达成共识),但尚处于起步阶段。地方行为主体也认为逐步方法对这一过程有支持作用。

结论

采用地区健康概况和政策对话相结合的逐步方法可促进健康活动的综合规划,并有助于地方层面公共卫生和初级保健之间的协作。各个步骤的强度和形式可能存在地方差异,但由于这些步骤切实可行且定义明确,它们仍可应用于其他社区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9783/4587830/0ef7893bd4c3/12889_2015_2307_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验