Kilianski Andy, Nuzzo Jennifer B, Modjarrad Kayvon
BioDefense Branch, Biosciences Division, Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Center for Health Security, Baltimore.
J Infect Dis. 2016 May 1;213(9):1364-9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv473. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
The ongoing moratorium on gain-of-function (GOF) research with highly pathogenic avian influenza virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus has drawn attention to the current debate on these research practices and the potential benefits and risks they present. While much of the discussion has been steered by members of the microbiology and policy communities, additional input from medical practitioners will be highly valuable toward developing a broadly inclusive policy that considers the relative value and harm of GOF research. This review attempts to serve as a primer on the topic for the clinical community by providing a historical context for GOF research, summarizing concerns about its risks, and surveying the medical products that it has yielded.
目前对高致病性禽流感病毒、严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒和中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒进行功能获得性(GOF)研究的暂停,引发了人们对这些研究实践及其带来的潜在益处和风险的当前辩论的关注。虽然大部分讨论是由微生物学和政策界成员主导的,但医学从业者的额外投入对于制定一项广泛包容的政策非常有价值,该政策要考虑到GOF研究的相对价值和危害。本综述试图通过提供GOF研究的历史背景、总结对其风险的担忧以及调查其所产生的医疗产品,为临床界提供该主题的入门知识。