Fears Robin, ter Meulen Volker
Biosciences Programme, EASAC, German National Academy of Sciences, Halle (Saale), Germany Gain of Function Working Group, EASAC, German National Academy of Sciences, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Biosciences Steering Panel, EASAC, German National Academy of Sciences, Halle (Saale), Germany Gain of Function Working Group, EASAC, German National Academy of Sciences, Halle (Saale), Germany
J Virol. 2015 Dec 23;90(5):2162-4. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03045-15.
Gain-of-function (GoF) studies to understand factors affecting transmissibility of potentially pandemic pathogens are controversial. The European Academies Science Advisory Council (EASAC) recently published consensus recommendations relating to GoF research review and management on self-regulation and harmonization; bioethical considerations; benefit-risk assessment; biosafety, and biosecurity advisory options; and publication of sensitive information. A layered approach to integration of responsibilities must include conforming to the stringent rules and guidance already existing. Further commitment is essential to extend the debate on issues worldwide.
为了解影响潜在大流行病原体传播性的因素而进行的功能获得(GoF)研究存在争议。欧洲科学院科学咨询委员会(EASAC)最近发布了关于GoF研究审查和管理的共识建议,内容涉及自我监管与协调;生物伦理考量;利弊评估;生物安全和生物安保咨询选项;以及敏感信息的发布。整合责任的分层方法必须包括遵守现有的严格规则和指导方针。进一步致力于在全球范围内就这些问题展开辩论至关重要。