Suppr超能文献

在21世纪从662名整形外科医生那里获得有效的调查反馈。

Getting a Valid Survey Response From 662 Plastic Surgeons in the 21st Century.

作者信息

Reinisch John F, Yu Daniel C, Li Wai-Yee

机构信息

From the *Craniofacial and Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Hills, CA; †University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY; and ‡Division of Plastic Surgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jan;76(1):3-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000546.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Web-based surveys save time and money. As electronic questionnaires have increased in popularity, telephone and mailed surveys have declined. With any survey, a response rate of 75% or greater is critical for the validity of any study. We wanted to determine which survey method achieved the highest response among academic plastic surgeons.

METHODS

All American Association of Plastic Surgeons members were surveyed regarding authorship issues. They were randomly assigned to receive the questionnaire through 1 of 4 methods: (A) emailed with a link to an online survey; (B) regular mail; (C) regular mail + $1 bill, and (D) regular mail + $5 bill. Two weeks after the initial mailing, the number of responses was collected, and nonresponders were contacted to remind them to participate. The study was closed after 10 weeks. Survey costs were calculated based on the actual cost of sending the initial survey, including stationary, printing, postage (groups B-D), labor, and cost of any financial incentives. Cost of reminders to nonresponders was calculated at $5 per reminder, giving a total survey cost.

RESULTS

Of 662 surveys sent, 54 were returned because of incorrect address/email, retirement, or death. Four hundred seventeen of the remaining 608 surveys were returned and analyzed. The response rate was lowest in the online group and highest in those mailed with a monetary incentive.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the convenience and low initial cost of web-based surveys, this generated the lowest response. We obtained statistically significant response rates (79% and 84%) only by using postal mail with monetary incentives and reminders. The inclusion of a $1 bill represented the greatest value and cost-effective survey method, based on cost per response.

摘要

引言

基于网络的调查节省时间和金钱。随着电子问卷越来越受欢迎,电话调查和邮寄调查的使用则有所减少。对于任何一项调查而言,75%或更高的回复率对于任何研究的有效性都至关重要。我们想确定哪种调查方法在学术整形外科医生中能获得最高的回复率。

方法

就作者身份问题对美国整形外科医生协会的所有成员进行了调查。他们被随机分配通过以下4种方法之一接收问卷:(A) 通过电子邮件发送在线调查链接;(B) 普通邮件;(C) 普通邮件 + 1美元纸币;(D) 普通邮件 + 5美元纸币。在首次邮寄两周后,收集回复数量,并联系未回复者提醒他们参与。10周后研究结束。调查成本根据发送初始调查问卷的实际成本计算,包括文具、印刷、邮费(B - D组)、人工以及任何经济激励措施的成本。给未回复者的提醒成本按每次提醒5美元计算,得出总调查成本。

结果

在发送的662份调查问卷中,有54份因地址/电子邮件错误、退休或死亡而被退回。对其余608份调查问卷中的417份进行了回收并分析。在线组的回复率最低,而附带金钱激励措施的邮寄组回复率最高。

结论

尽管基于网络的调查方便且初始成本低,但它产生的回复率最低。我们仅通过使用附带金钱激励措施和提醒的邮政邮件才获得了具有统计学意义的回复率(79%和84%)。基于每份回复的成本,附带1美元纸币是最具价值且性价比最高的调查方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验