Jackson K A, Glyn-Jones S, Batt M E, Arden N K, Newton J L
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
Arthritis Research UK Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 29;5(9):e007609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007609.
Hip pain and injury as a result of activity can lead to the development of early hip osteoarthritis (OA) in susceptible individuals. Our understanding of the factors that increase susceptibility continues to evolve. The ability to clearly identify individuals (and cohorts) with activity-related hip pain who are at risk of early hip OA is currently lacking. The purpose of this study was to gain expert consensus on which key clinical measures might help predict the risk of early hip OA in individuals presenting with activity-related hip pain. The agreed measures would constitute a standardised approach to initial clinical assessment to help identify these individuals.
This Dephi study used online surveys to gain concordance of expert opinion in a structured process of 'rounds'. In this study, we asked 'What outcome measures are useful in predicting hip OA in activity-related hip pain?' The Delphi panel consisted of experts from sport and exercise medicine, orthopaedics, rheumatology, physiotherapy and OA research.
The study identified key clinical measures in the history, examination and investigations (plain anteroposterior radiograph and femoroacetabular impingement views) that the panel agreed would be useful in predicting future risk of hip OA when assessing activity-related hip pain. The panel also agreed that certain investigations and tests (eg, MR angiography) did not currently have a role in routine assessment. There was a lack of consensus regarding the role of MRI, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and certain biomechanical and functional assessments.
We provide a standardised approach to the clinical assessment of patients with activity-related hip pain. Assessment measures rejected by the Delphi panel were newer, more expensive investigations that currently lack evidence. Assessment measures that did not reach consensus include MRI and PROMs. Their role remains ambiguous and would benefit from further research.
活动导致的髋部疼痛和损伤会使易感个体患上早期髋骨关节炎(OA)。我们对增加易感性的因素的理解仍在不断发展。目前尚缺乏明确识别有与活动相关髋部疼痛且有早期髋OA风险的个体(及队列)的能力。本研究的目的是就哪些关键临床指标有助于预测出现与活动相关髋部疼痛的个体发生早期髋OA的风险达成专家共识。达成一致的指标将构成初始临床评估的标准化方法,以帮助识别这些个体。
这项德尔菲研究通过在线调查在“轮次”的结构化过程中获得专家意见的一致性。在本研究中,我们询问“哪些结果指标有助于预测与活动相关髋部疼痛患者的髋OA?”德尔菲小组由运动与运动医学专家、骨科专家、风湿病专家、物理治疗师和OA研究专家组成。
该研究确定了病史、体格检查和检查(前后位平片和股骨髋臼撞击视图)中的关键临床指标,专家小组一致认为这些指标在评估与活动相关的髋部疼痛时有助于预测未来髋OA的风险。专家小组还一致认为,某些检查和测试(如磁共振血管造影)目前在常规评估中没有作用。关于MRI、患者报告结局指标(PROMs)以及某些生物力学和功能评估的作用,尚未达成共识。
我们提供了一种对与活动相关髋部疼痛患者进行临床评估的标准化方法。被德尔菲小组否决的评估指标是目前缺乏证据的更新、更昂贵的检查。未达成共识的评估指标包括MRI和PROMs。它们的作用仍不明确,需要进一步研究。