Suppr超能文献

中心静脉压和肺毛细血管楔压作为左心房压力的评估指标:呼气末正压和导管尖端位置不当的影响

Central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure as estimates of left atrial pressure: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and catheter tip malposition.

作者信息

Rajacich N, Burchard K W, Hasan F M, Singh A K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1989 Jan;17(1):7-11. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198901000-00003.

Abstract

We compared CVP and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (WP) measurements with left atrial pressure (LAP) in postcoronary bypass surgical patients with preserved cardiopulmonary function. Measurements were obtained under normal conditions and conditions likely to induce WP-LAP discrepancies (PEEP and catheter tip malposition). Patients were in both supine and lateral positions; the catheter tip was placed vertically below (tip down; n = 12) or above (tip up; n = 5) the left atrium. Our data showed that both CVP and WP correlated well with LAP at all PEEP levels in the supine and tip down lateral positions. However, in the tip up lateral position, WP overestimated LAP (13.3 +/- 3.4 vs. 8.0 +/- 2 mm Hg; p less than .01) at 20 cm H2O of PEEP, whereas CVP (8.8 +/- 2.1 mm Hg) closely reflected LAP. Thus, by placing the catheter tip vertically below the left atrium in supinely and laterally positioned patients, CVP and WP both produced reliable estimates of LAP despite an acute increase in alveolar pressure. When the pulmonary artery catheter tip was vertically above the left atrium, WP overestimated LAP. Under these conditions, CVP remained a reliable estimate of LAP. We conclude that CVP measurement as an estimate of LAP in this patient population could be used and not ignored. This is true in patients with previously documented good LAP-CVP correlation who are subjected subsequently to conditions which may produce an LAP-WP discrepancy (high PEEP and catheter tip malposition).

摘要

我们比较了冠状动脉搭桥术后心肺功能正常患者的中心静脉压(CVP)和肺毛细血管楔压(WP)测量值与左心房压力(LAP)。测量在正常条件以及可能导致WP-LAP差异的条件(呼气末正压通气和导管尖端位置不当)下进行。患者处于仰卧位和侧卧位;导管尖端垂直置于左心房下方(尖端向下;n = 12)或上方(尖端向上;n = 5)。我们的数据显示,在仰卧位和尖端向下的侧卧位中,所有呼气末正压通气水平下CVP和WP均与LAP密切相关。然而,在尖端向上的侧卧位中,在20 cm H₂O呼气末正压通气时,WP高估了LAP(13.3±3.4 vs. 8.0±2 mmHg;p<0.01),而CVP(8.8±2.1 mmHg)与LAP密切相关。因此,在仰卧位和侧卧位患者中,将导管尖端垂直置于左心房下方时,尽管肺泡压力急性升高,CVP和WP均能可靠地估计LAP。当肺动脉导管尖端垂直位于左心房上方时,WP高估了LAP。在这些情况下,CVP仍然是LAP的可靠估计值。我们得出结论,在该患者群体中,CVP测量作为LAP的估计值是可以使用且不应被忽视的。对于先前记录显示LAP-CVP相关性良好,随后又受到可能导致LAP-WP差异(高呼气末正压通气和导管尖端位置不当)情况影响的患者,情况也是如此。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验