Calabrese Sarah K, Meyer Ilan H, Overstreet Nicole M, Haile Rahwa, Hansen Nathan B
Yale School of Public Health/Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
The Williams Institute UCLA School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Psychol Women Q. 2015 Sep 1;39(3):287-304. doi: 10.1177/0361684314560730. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
Black sexual minority women are triply marginalized due to their race, gender, and sexual orientation. We compared three dimensions of discrimination-frequency (regularity of occurrences), scope (number of types of discriminatory acts experienced), and number of bases (number of social statuses to which discrimination was attributed)-and self-reported mental health (depressive symptoms, psychological well-being, and social well-being) between 64 Black sexual minority women and each of two groups sharing two of three marginalized statuses: (a) 67 White sexual minority women and (b) 67 Black sexual minority men. Black sexual minority women reported greater discrimination frequency, scope, and number of bases and poorer psychological and social well-being than White sexual minority women and more discrimination bases, a higher level of depressive symptoms, and poorer social well-being than Black sexual minority men. We then tested and contrasted dimensions of discrimination as mediators between social status (race or gender) and mental health outcomes. Discrimination frequency and scope mediated the association between race and mental health, with a stronger effect via frequency among sexual minority women. Number of discrimination bases mediated the association between gender and mental health among Black sexual minorities. Future research and clinical practice would benefit from considering Black sexual minority women's mental health in a multidimensional minority stress context.
黑人性少数群体女性因其种族、性别和性取向而遭受三重边缘化。我们比较了64名黑人性少数群体女性与另外两组分别共享三种边缘化身份中的两种身份的人群之间的歧视的三个维度——频率(发生的规律性)、范围(经历的歧视行为类型数量)和依据数量(被归因歧视的社会身份数量)——以及自我报告的心理健康状况(抑郁症状、心理幸福感和社会幸福感):(a)67名白人性少数群体女性和(b)67名黑人男性性少数群体。与白人性少数群体女性相比,黑人性少数群体女性报告的歧视频率、范围和依据数量更高,心理和社会幸福感更差;与黑人男性性少数群体相比,她们的歧视依据更多,抑郁症状水平更高,社会幸福感更差。然后,我们测试并对比了作为社会身份(种族或性别)与心理健康结果之间中介因素的歧视维度。歧视频率和范围介导了种族与心理健康之间的关联,在性少数群体女性中,通过频率产生的影响更强。歧视依据数量介导了黑人性少数群体中性别与心理健康之间的关联。未来的研究和临床实践将受益于在多维少数群体压力背景下考虑黑人性少数群体女性的心理健康。