Doocy Shannon, Lyles Emily, Delbiso Tefera D, Robinson Courtland W
Center for Refugee and Disaster Response, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
Center for Research and Epidemiology in Disasters, Catholic University of Louvain, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs, Bte B1.30.15, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Confl Health. 2015 Oct 1;9:33. doi: 10.1186/s13031-015-0060-7. eCollection 2015.
Since the start of the Syrian crisis in 2011, civil unrest and armed conflict in the country have resulted in a rapidly increasing number of people displaced both within and outside of Syria. Those displaced face immense challenges in meeting their basic needs. This study sought to characterize internal displacement in Syria, including trends in both time and place, and to provide insights on the association between displacement and selected measures of household well-being and humanitarian needs.
This study presents findings from two complementary methods: a desk review of displaced population estimates and movements and a needs assessment of 3930 Syrian households affected by the crisis. The first method, a desk review of displaced population estimates and movements, provides a retrospective analysis of national trends in displacement from March 2011 through June 2014. The second method, analysis of findings from a 2014 needs assessment by displacement status, provides insight into the displaced population and the association between displacement and humanitarian needs.
Findings indicate that while displacement often corresponds to conflict levels, such trends were not uniformly observed in governorate-level analysis. Governorate level IDP estimates do not provide information on a scale detailed enough to adequately plan humanitarian assistance. Furthermore, such estimates are often influenced by obstructed access to certain areas, unsubstantiated reports, and substantial discrepancies in reporting. Secondary displacement is not consistently reported across sources nor are additional details about displacement, including whether displaced individuals originated within the current governorate or outside of the governorate. More than half (56.4 %) of households reported being displaced more than once, with a majority displaced for more than one year (73.3 %). Some differences between displaced and non-displaced population were observed in residence crowding, food consumption, health access, and education.
Differences in reported living conditions and key health, nutrition, and education indicators between displaced and non-displaced populations indicate a need to better understand migration trends in order to inform planning and provision of live saving humanitarian assistance.
自2011年叙利亚危机爆发以来,该国的内乱和武装冲突导致叙利亚国内外流离失所的人数迅速增加。这些流离失所者在满足基本需求方面面临巨大挑战。本研究旨在描述叙利亚境内流离失所的特征,包括时间和地点趋势,并深入了解流离失所与家庭福祉及人道主义需求的选定衡量指标之间的关联。
本研究展示了两种互补方法的结果:对流离失所人口估计数和流动情况的案头审查,以及对3930户受危机影响的叙利亚家庭的需求评估。第一种方法,即对流离失所人口估计数和流动情况的案头审查,对2011年3月至2014年6月期间全国流离失所趋势进行了回顾性分析。第二种方法,即根据流离失所状况对2014年需求评估结果进行分析,深入了解了流离失所人口以及流离失所与人道主义需求之间的关联。
研究结果表明,虽然流离失所情况往往与冲突程度相对应,但在省级分析中并未一致观察到这种趋势。省级境内流离失所者估计数所提供的信息规模不够详细,无法为人道主义援助提供充分规划依据。此外,此类估计数往往受到某些地区难以进入、报告未经证实以及报告存在重大差异的影响。二次流离失所情况在不同来源之间的报告并不一致,关于流离失所的其他细节,包括流离失所者是否来自当前省份内部或外部,也没有一致的报告。超过一半(56.4%)的家庭报告称曾不止一次流离失所,其中大多数流离失所时间超过一年(73.3%)。在居住拥挤程度、食品消费、医疗服务获取和教育方面,观察到了流离失所人口与非流离失所人口之间的一些差异。
流离失所人口与非流离失所人口在报告的生活条件以及关键的健康、营养和教育指标方面存在差异,这表明有必要更好地了解移民趋势,以便为拯救生命的人道主义援助规划和提供提供信息。