Suppr超能文献

中国北京大型公立医院医疗服务质量的差异:基于病情的结果评估方法

Variations in the Quality of Care at Large Public Hospitals in Beijing, China: A Condition-Based Outcome Approach.

作者信息

Xu Ye, Liu Yuanli, Shu Ting, Yang Wei, Liang Minghui

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

National Institute for Hospital Administration, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Beijing, The People's Republic of China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Oct 2;10(10):e0138948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138948. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public hospitals deliver over ninety percent of all outpatient and inpatient services in China. Their quality is graded into three levels (A, B, and C) largely based on structural resources, but empirical evidence on the quality of process and outcome of care is extremely scarce. As expectations for quality care rise with higher living standards and cost of care, such evidence is urgently needed and vital to improve care and to inform future health reforms.

METHODS

We compiled and analyzed a multicenter database of over 4 million inpatient discharge summary records to provide a comprehensive assessment of the level and variations in clinical outcomes of hospitalization at 39 tertiary hospitals in Beijing. We assessed six outcome measures of clinical quality: in-hospital mortality rates (RSMR) for AMI, stroke, pneumonia and CABG, post-procedural complication rate (RS-CR), and failure-to-rescue rate (RS-FTR). The measures were adjusted for pre-admission patient case-mix using indirect standardization method with hierarchical linear mixed models.

RESULTS

We found good overall quality with large variations by hospital and condition (mean/range, in %): RSMR-AMI: 6.23 (2.37-14.48), RSMR-stroke: 4.18 (3.58-4.44), RSMR-pneumonia: 7.78 (7.20-8.59), RSMR-CABG: 1.93 (1.55-2.23), RS-CR: 11.38 (9.9-12.88), and RS-FTR: 6.41 (5.17-7.58). Hospital grade was not significantly associated with any risk-adjusted outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Going to a higher grade public hospital does not always lead to better patient outcome because hospital grade only contains information about hospital structural resources. A hospital report card with some outcome measures of quality would provide valuable information to patients in choosing providers, and for regulators to identify gaps in health care quality. Reducing the variations in clinical practice and patient outcome should be a focus for policy makers in the next round of health sector reforms in China.

摘要

背景

在中国,公立医院提供了超过90%的门诊和住院服务。其质量主要根据结构资源分为三个等级(A、B和C),但关于医疗过程质量和护理结果的实证证据极为匮乏。随着生活水平的提高和医疗成本的增加,人们对优质护理的期望也在上升,此类证据对于改善护理以及为未来的医疗改革提供参考至关重要且迫切需要。

方法

我们汇编并分析了一个包含400多万份住院出院小结记录的多中心数据库,以全面评估北京39家三级医院的住院临床结果水平及差异。我们评估了临床质量的六项结果指标:急性心肌梗死(AMI)、中风、肺炎和冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的院内死亡率(RSMR)、术后并发症发生率(RS-CR)和未能抢救成功率(RS-FTR)。采用分层线性混合模型的间接标准化方法,对入院前患者病例组合进行了调整。

结果

我们发现总体质量良好,但不同医院和病情存在较大差异(均值/范围,%):AMI的RSMR为6.23(2.37 - 14.48),中风的RSMR为4.18(3.58 - 4.44),肺炎的RSMR为7.78(7.20 - 8.59),CABG的RSMR为1.93(1.55 - 2.23),RS-CR为11.38(9.9 - 12.88),RS-FTR为6.41(5.17 - 7.58)。医院等级与任何风险调整后的结果指标均无显著关联。

结论

前往等级更高的公立医院并不总是能带来更好的患者结局,因为医院等级仅包含有关医院结构资源的信息。一份包含一些质量结果指标的医院报告卡将为患者选择医疗服务提供者以及监管机构识别医疗质量差距提供有价值的信息。减少临床实践和患者结局的差异应成为中国下一轮医疗卫生改革中政策制定者的重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d09b/4592271/6934a4d8ea3b/pone.0138948.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验