Suppr超能文献

普拉提和瑜伽团体运动干预对慢性机械性颈部疼痛的比较效果:半随机平行对照研究。

Comparative effectiveness of Pilates and yoga group exercise interventions for chronic mechanical neck pain: quasi-randomised parallel controlled study.

作者信息

Dunleavy K, Kava K, Goldberg A, Malek M H, Talley S A, Tutag-Lehr V, Hildreth J

机构信息

Wayne State University, Physical Therapy Program, Detroit, MI, USA; University of Michigan-Flint, Physical Therapy Department, Flint, MI, USA.

Oakland Physical Therapy, Novi, MI, USA.

出版信息

Physiotherapy. 2016 Sep;102(3):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Aug 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of Pilates and yoga group exercise interventions for individuals with chronic neck pain (CNP).

DESIGN

Quasi-randomised parallel controlled study.

SETTING

Community, university and private practice settings in four locations.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-six individuals with CNP scoring ≥3/10 on the numeric pain rating scale for >3 months (controls n=17, Pilates n=20, yoga n=19).

INTERVENTIONS

Exercise participants completed 12 small-group sessions with modifications and progressions supervised by a physiotherapist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Secondary outcomes were pain ratings, range of movement and postural measurements collected at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Follow-up was performed 6 weeks after completion of the exercise classes (Week 18).

RESULTS

NDI decreased significantly in the Pilates {baseline: 11.1 [standard deviation (SD) 4.3] vs Week 12: 6.8 (SD 4.3); mean difference -4.3 (95% confidence interval -1.64 to -6.7); P<0.001} and yoga groups [baseline: 12.8 (SD 7.4) vs Week 12: 8.1 (SD 5.6); mean difference -4.7 (95% confidence interval -2.1 to -7.4); P<0.00], with no change in the control group. Pain ratings also improved significantly. Moderate-to-large effect sizes (0.7 to 1.8) and low numbers needed to treat were found. There were no differences in outcomes between the exercise groups or associated adverse effects. No improvements in range of movement or posture were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Pilates and yoga group exercise interventions with appropriate modifications and supervision were safe and equally effective for decreasing disability and pain compared with the control group for individuals with mild-to-moderate CNP. Physiotherapists may consider including these approaches in a plan of care.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01999283.

摘要

目的

确定普拉提和瑜伽团体运动干预对慢性颈部疼痛(CNP)患者的有效性。

设计

半随机平行对照研究。

地点

四个地点的社区、大学和私人诊所。

参与者

56名慢性颈部疼痛患者,数字疼痛评分量表得分≥3/10且持续时间超过3个月(对照组n = 17,普拉提组n = 20,瑜伽组n = 19)。

干预措施

运动参与者在物理治疗师的监督下完成12次小组课程,课程内容有调整和进阶。

主要结局指标

主要结局指标是颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)。次要结局指标是在基线、6周和12周时收集的疼痛评分、活动范围和姿势测量数据。在运动课程结束后6周(第18周)进行随访。

结果

普拉提组NDI显著降低{基线:11.1[标准差(SD)4.3]vs第12周:6.8(SD 4.3);平均差值-4.3(95%置信区间-1.64至-6.7);P<0.001},瑜伽组也显著降低[基线:12.8(SD 7.4)vs第12周:8.1(SD 5.6);平均差值-4.7(95%置信区间-2.1至-7.4);P<0.00],而对照组无变化。疼痛评分也显著改善。发现了中度至较大的效应量(0.7至1.8)和较低的治疗所需人数。运动组之间的结局或相关不良反应没有差异。未发现活动范围或姿势有改善。

结论

对于轻至中度慢性颈部疼痛患者,进行适当调整和监督的普拉提和瑜伽团体运动干预与对照组相比,在减少功能障碍和疼痛方面是安全且同样有效的。物理治疗师可考虑将这些方法纳入护理计划。

临床试验注册号

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01999283。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验