Gilmour J M, Rosenberg P J
Stanford University, California.
CMAJ. 1989 Feb 1;140(3):279-88.
Medicolegal issues in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care were considered in the United States by the National Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in 1985. This paper discusses these issues in the Canadian context. Although there is little legislation or case precedent in Canada to guide providers of CPR in decision-making, there appears to be little risk of liability or prosecution for competently rendered care. Providers should be cautious in withholding or withdrawing resuscitative measures from incompetent patients when brain death has not occurred and cardiovascular unresponsiveness has not been demonstrated. However, resuscitation may be withheld when a competent patient refuses it or if there is another medically and legally valid reason to do so.
1985年,美国心肺复苏全国会议探讨了心肺复苏(CPR)和紧急心脏护理中的法医学问题。本文在加拿大背景下讨论这些问题。尽管加拿大几乎没有立法或判例先例来指导心肺复苏提供者进行决策,但对于提供合理的护理,似乎几乎不存在承担责任或被起诉的风险。当脑死亡尚未发生且未证明心血管无反应时,提供者在对无行为能力的患者停止或撤销复苏措施时应谨慎。然而,当有行为能力的患者拒绝复苏或有其他医学和法律上有效的理由时,可以停止复苏。