Angotti Nicole, Sennott Christie
American University, MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (South Africa).
Purdue University, MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (South Africa).
Qual Res. 2015 Aug;15(4):437-453. doi: 10.1177/1468794114543402. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
We describe the conceptualization and implementation of a research methodology in which "insider" community members work with "outsider" investigators as participant observers to document everyday conversations taking place in public settings in their communities. Our study took place in a resource-poor area of rural South Africa and focused on HIV/AIDS, yet we aim here to provide a road map for those interested in implementing this approach in other contexts for various empirical ends. Because this approach is unusual, we highlight considerations in selecting a team of ethnographers, describe the training process, and offer ways to ensure the data collected are trustworthy and confidential. We describe the advantages and limitations of utilizing "insider ethnography" in contexts where being indigenous to the study site provides access to perspectives that cannot be obtained through other methods. Finally, we examine how mutuality and the positionality of the research team affect data collection and quality.
我们描述了一种研究方法的概念化及实施过程,即“内部”社区成员与“外部”研究者作为参与观察者合作,记录他们社区公共场所中日常发生的对话。我们的研究在南非农村资源匮乏地区开展,重点关注艾滋病毒/艾滋病,然而我们在此旨在为那些有兴趣在其他背景下出于各种实证目的实施这种方法的人提供一份路线图。由于这种方法不常见,我们强调了在挑选一组人种志学者时的注意事项,描述了培训过程,并提供了确保所收集数据可靠且保密的方法。我们描述了在研究地点为本地人能提供通过其他方法无法获得的观点的背景下利用“内部人种志”的优点和局限性。最后,我们考察了研究团队的相互性和定位如何影响数据收集及质量。