Viard D, Netillard C, Cheraitia E, Barthod V, Choffel J M, Tartary D, Sauze M, Nouara A, Chalmendrier C, Tissot E
Pôle pharmacie-médecine spécialisée-hygiène, établissement public de santé mentale de Besançon-Novillars, rue du Dr-Charcot, 25220 Novillars, France.
Centre hospitalier spécialisé du Jura-St-Ylie, 39000 Dole, France.
Encephale. 2016 Feb;42(1):4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Oct 10.
Why do caregivers working in psychiatry seem to wonder about their practices, in front of the recent mediatisation of patient education in France? Do our educational practices meet the needs and the expectations of patients and their families? These questions led us to carry out this qualitative and prospective study concerning the representations of patient education of the main actors in psychiatry.
This work aims to assess the representations of patient education of the main actors in psychiatry, in particular to assess convergences and divergences.
This is a qualitative and prospective study. Qualitative data are speeches from caregivers working in psychiatry, patients suffering from a psychiatric pathology and their families. The three populations studied were defined by precise characteristics. The sample was diversified by a variable related to the study theme: experience or not in patient education. Speeches were collected during interviews, which were carried out by the same person. Interviews were semi-structured by a thematic guide, which defined the themes to be explored. The three main themes are: the concept of patient education, the objectives of patient education, and the caregiver/patient relationship. We analysed the content of the speeches with a lexical reference table that we elaborated from the literature of experts in patient education. We also realised a transverse analysis in order to assess convergences and divergences between the different speeches.
Thirty-two interviews were realised with fifteen caregivers (six psychiatrists and nine nurses), ten patients and seven families. In the speeches of the different populations, we found the expected element of language for all the themes explored. Unexpected ideas were also found in the speeches of the various groups. We could find convergences and divergences concerning these unexpected ideas between and within each group. Regarding convergences, all the groups mentioned the unexpected idea of the problem of social representations of psychiatric diseases. The three groups also approached the need to develop the work with families. Patients and families entrusted their feeling that there would be a lack of exchange with some caregivers. Patients and caregivers evoked the paternalistic attitude of some caregivers. Finally, both caregivers and family approached their questions regarding the caregiver/patient relationship during care without the patient's consent. We found several divergences in the caregivers' speeches. These divergences seemed to be correlated with the experience in patient education in psychiatry. They concerned the scope of patient education in psychiatry, the differences perceived between patient education in psychiatry or in somatic cares, and the diagnostic announcement to the patient. This last unexpected idea was the main point of divergence between caregivers and patients.
Results of this study showed that the representations of caregivers, patients and their families correlate with the experts' ideas regarding patient education. The analysis of the different speeches highlighted several unexpected ideas, which constitute themes of reflection about patient education. Some of these themes concern in particular the medical domain of psychiatry such as the questions about caregiver/patient relationship during care without the patient's consent and restraint. Another theme of psychiatry specific reflection is the differences perceived by some caregivers between their practices and the patient education in somatic care. Others themes of reflection highlighted all the medical specialities: the need to develop the work with families, the problem of the social representations of diseases, the scopes of patient education and the diagnostic announcement to the patient.
This study highlighted several themes of reflection about patient education in psychiatry. We should include this theme of reflection in our practices in order to respond more precisely to the needs and the expectations of the patients and their families.
在法国近期患者教育媒体化的背景下,为何精神科护理人员似乎对自身的做法感到疑惑?我们的教育实践是否满足了患者及其家属的需求与期望?这些问题促使我们开展了这项关于精神科主要行为者对患者教育认知的定性前瞻性研究。
本研究旨在评估精神科主要行为者对患者教育的认知,尤其要评估其一致性和差异性。
这是一项定性前瞻性研究。定性数据来自精神科护理人员、患有精神疾病的患者及其家属的言论。所研究的三类人群由精确的特征界定。样本根据与研究主题相关的一个变量进行了多样化选择:有无患者教育经验。言论是在由同一人进行的访谈过程中收集的。访谈通过主题指南进行半结构化,该指南界定了要探讨的主题。三个主要主题是:患者教育的概念、患者教育的目标以及护理人员与患者的关系。我们使用从患者教育专家文献中精心编制的词汇参考表来分析言论内容。我们还进行了横向分析,以评估不同言论之间的一致性和差异性。
我们对15名护理人员(6名精神科医生和9名护士)、10名患者和7个家庭进行了32次访谈。在不同人群的言论中,我们发现了所有探讨主题中预期的语言元素。在各群体的言论中也发现了一些意外的观点。我们可以在每个群体内部和群体之间找到关于这些意外观点的一致性和差异性。关于一致性,所有群体都提到了精神疾病社会认知问题这一意外观点。这三个群体也都谈到了与家庭合作开展工作的必要性。患者和家属表达了他们感觉与一些护理人员缺乏交流的看法。患者和护理人员提到了一些护理人员家长式的态度。最后,护理人员和家属都谈到了在未经患者同意的情况下护理期间他们对护理人员与患者关系的疑问。我们在护理人员的言论中发现了一些差异。这些差异似乎与精神科患者教育经验相关。它们涉及精神科患者教育的范围、精神科与躯体护理中患者教育所感知到的差异以及向患者进行诊断告知。最后这个意外观点是护理人员和患者之间分歧的主要点。
本研究结果表明,护理人员、患者及其家属的认知与专家关于患者教育的观点相关。对不同言论的分析突出了几个意外观点,这些观点构成了关于患者教育的思考主题。其中一些主题尤其涉及精神医学领域,比如在未经患者同意的情况下护理期间护理人员与患者关系以及约束方面的问题。精神科特定反思的另一个主题是一些护理人员所感知到的他们的实践与躯体护理中患者教育之间的差异。其他反思主题在所有医学专科中都有体现:与家庭合作开展工作的必要性、疾病社会认知问题、患者教育的范围以及向患者进行诊断告知。
本研究突出了精神科患者教育的几个反思主题。我们应将这一反思主题纳入我们的实践中,以便更精准地回应患者及其家属的需求与期望。