Bergner M
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S148-56. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00012.
Although interest is increasing in measurement of quality of life, health status, and functional status in clinical research, most often the primary focus of the research is traditional measures of mortality and morbidity. Quality-of-life assessments are usually added as an afterthought once the design, data collection, and analytic techniques have been specified. When nonmedical outcomes are considered, they are thought of as quality-of-life outcomes. Quality of life is not well conceptualized in the medical and health literature. In addition, clinical researchers are searching for a single best measure of quality of life. Lack of information about clinical significance and sensitivity and uncertainties about the advantages of different administration strategies are impediments to use of developed measures. These issues and problems are discussed and suggestions made about procedures and investigations that could provide guidance.
尽管在临床研究中,人们对生活质量、健康状况和功能状态测量的兴趣日益增加,但研究的主要重点通常仍是死亡率和发病率的传统测量指标。一旦确定了研究设计、数据收集和分析技术,生活质量评估通常才作为事后补充被添加进来。当考虑非医学结果时,它们被视为生活质量结果。医学和健康文献中对生活质量的概念界定并不清晰。此外,临床研究人员正在寻找一种单一的最佳生活质量测量方法。缺乏关于临床意义和敏感性的信息,以及不同施测策略优势的不确定性,阻碍了已开发测量方法的使用。本文将讨论这些问题,并针对可能提供指导的程序和调查提出建议。