Suppr超能文献

测量精神疾病患者的参与度:一项系统评价,评估现有量表在中低收入国家的相关性。

Measuring participation for persons with mental illness: a systematic review assessing relevance of existing scales for low and middle income countries.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8111, 4488 Forest Park, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2015 Oct 14;3:36. doi: 10.1186/s40359-015-0093-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participation is increasingly becoming an important outcome for assessment in many fields, including development, disability and policy implementation. However, selecting specific instruments to measure participation has been a significant problem due to overlapping conceptual definitions and use of different theories. The objective of this paper is to identify participation instruments, examine theories/definition supporting their use and highlight scales for use in low and middle-income countries for persons with mental illness.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify instruments intended to measure participation for individuals with severe mental illness. The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2003 and 2014. Instruments that measured related concepts of well-being, quality of life and social functioning were also identified and screened for items that pertained to participation, defined as empowerment and collective capabilities.

RESULTS

Five scales met established criteria for assessing participation and were determined to contain questions measuring empowerment and/or collective capabilities. However, each scale largely assessed individual functioning and capacity, while neglecting collective aspects of the community. All scales were developed in high-income countries and none were used in low and middle-income countries.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an urgent need for participation scales to focus on empowerment as well as collective capabilities. Further, development of participation scales should clearly delineate theoretical foundations and concepts used. Finally, participation scales used in low and middle income countries should consider how contextual factors like medicine, poverty and disability, particularly with regards to mental illness, impact content of the scale.

摘要

背景

参与度在许多领域,包括发展、残疾和政策执行等领域,已逐渐成为一个重要的评估结果。然而,由于概念定义重叠和使用不同的理论,选择特定的工具来衡量参与度一直是一个重大问题。本文的目的是确定参与度工具,检查支持其使用的理论/定义,并强调在中低收入国家用于精神疾病患者的量表。

方法

进行了系统的文献回顾,以确定用于衡量严重精神疾病患者参与度的工具。搜索范围仅限于 2003 年至 2014 年期间以英文发表的同行评议文章。还确定了测量与幸福感、生活质量和社会功能相关概念的工具,并对与参与度(定义为赋权和集体能力)相关的项目进行了筛选。

结果

有五个量表符合评估参与度的既定标准,并确定包含衡量赋权和/或集体能力的问题。然而,每个量表主要评估个人的功能和能力,而忽略了社区的集体方面。所有量表均在高收入国家开发,没有一个在中低收入国家使用。

结论

迫切需要有专门的量表来关注赋权和集体能力。此外,参与度量表的制定应明确划定所使用的理论基础和概念。最后,在中低收入国家使用的参与度量表应考虑到药物、贫困和残疾等环境因素(特别是与精神疾病有关的因素)如何影响量表的内容。

相似文献

2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
4
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.
5
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring social inclusion--a key outcome in global mental health.
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;43(2):354-64. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt224. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
2
Participation and social participation: are they distinct concepts?
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Mar;28(3):211-20. doi: 10.1177/0269215513499029. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
4
Capabilities as menus: a non-welfarist basis for QALY evaluation.
J Health Econ. 2013 Jan;32(1):128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
5
Social participation: redesign of education, research, and practice in occupational therapy*.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2013 Jan;20(1):2-8. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2012.744093. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
6
A systematic scoping review of measures of participation in disability and rehabilitation research: a preliminary report of findings.
Disabil Health J. 2012 Oct;5(4):224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
7
Association between poverty and psychiatric disability among Chinese population aged 15-64 years.
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):917-20. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.05.026. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
8
Improving access to mental health care and psychosocial support within a fragile context: a case study from Afghanistan.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):e1001225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001225. Epub 2012 May 29.
9
Development of an instrument to measure self-efficacy for social participation of people with mental illness.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2012 Jun;26(3):240-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
10
Self-efficacy and self-esteem as predictors of participation in spinal cord injury--an ICF-based study.
Spinal Cord. 2012 Sep;50(9):699-706. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.18. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验