Maheshwari Abha, McLernon David, Bhattacharya Siladitya
Aberdeen Fertility Centre, NHS Grampian, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK
Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB24 2ZD, UK.
Hum Reprod. 2015 Dec;30(12):2703-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev263. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
Traditionally, IVF success rates have been reported in terms of live birth per fresh cycle or embryo transfer. With the increasing use of embryo freezing and thawing it is essential that we report not only outcomes following fresh but also those after frozen embryo transfer as a complete measure of success of an IVF treatment. Most people agree that an individual's chance of having a baby following fresh and frozen embryo transfer should be described as cumulative live birth rate. However, views on the most appropriate parameters required to calculate such an outcome have been inconsistent. There is an additional dimension-time for all frozen embryos to be used up by a couple, which can influence the outcome. Given that cumulative live birth rate is generally perceived to be the preferred reporting system in IVF, it is time to have an international consensus on how this statistic is calculated, reported and interpreted by stakeholders across the world.
传统上,体外受精(IVF)成功率是以每个新鲜周期或胚胎移植后的活产率来报告的。随着胚胎冷冻和解冻技术的日益普及,至关重要的是,我们不仅要报告新鲜胚胎移植后的结果,还要报告冷冻胚胎移植后的结果,以此作为IVF治疗成功的完整衡量标准。大多数人认为,个体在新鲜胚胎移植和冷冻胚胎移植后生育的几率应描述为累积活产率。然而,对于计算这一结果所需的最合适参数,各方观点并不一致。还有一个额外的维度——一对夫妇用完所有冷冻胚胎的时间,这可能会影响结果。鉴于累积活产率通常被认为是IVF中首选的报告系统,现在是时候就如何计算、报告和解释这一统计数据达成国际共识了,世界各地的利益相关者都应参与其中。