Saarela Olli
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
Lifetime Data Anal. 2016 Oct;22(4):589-605. doi: 10.1007/s10985-015-9352-x. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
Case-base sampling provides an alternative to risk set sampling based methods to estimate hazard regression models, in particular when absolute hazards are also of interest in addition to hazard ratios. The case-base sampling approach results in a likelihood expression of the logistic regression form, but instead of categorized time, such an expression is obtained through sampling of a discrete set of person-time coordinates from all follow-up data. In this paper, in the context of a time-dependent exposure such as vaccination, and a potentially recurrent adverse event outcome, we show that the resulting partial likelihood for the outcome event intensity has the asymptotic properties of a likelihood. We contrast this approach to self-matched case-base sampling, which involves only within-individual comparisons. The efficiency of the case-base methods is compared to that of standard methods through simulations, suggesting that the information loss due to sampling is minimal.
基于病例的抽样为基于风险集抽样的方法提供了一种替代方案,用于估计风险回归模型,特别是当除了风险比之外,绝对风险也受到关注时。基于病例的抽样方法会产生逻辑回归形式的似然表达式,但不是通过对时间进行分类,而是通过从所有随访数据中对一组离散的人时坐标进行抽样来获得这样的表达式。在本文中,在诸如疫苗接种这样的随时间变化的暴露以及潜在的复发性不良事件结果的背景下,我们表明,由此产生的结局事件强度的部分似然具有似然的渐近性质。我们将这种方法与仅涉及个体内比较的自我匹配基于病例的抽样方法进行对比。通过模拟将基于病例的方法的效率与标准方法的效率进行比较,结果表明由于抽样导致的信息损失最小。