Liu Pei-Pei, Safin Vasiliy, Yang Barry, Luhmann Christian C
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 15;10(10):e0140357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140357. eCollection 2015.
Prior research has suggested that recipients of generosity behave more generously themselves (a direct social influence). In contrast, there is conflicting evidence about the existence of indirect influence (i.e., whether interacting with a recipient of generosity causes one to behave more generously), casting doubt on the possibility that altruistic behavior can cascade through social networks. The current study investigated how far selfish and generous behavior can be transmitted through social networks and the cognitive mechanisms that underlie such transmission. Participants played a sequence of public goods games comprising a chain network. This network is advantageous because it permits only a single, unambiguous path of influence. Furthermore, we experimentally manipulated the behavior of the first link in the chain to be either generous or selfish. Results revealed the presence of direct social influence, but no evidence for indirect influence. Results also showed that selfish behavior exerted a substantially greater influence than generous behavior. Finally, expectations about future partners' behavior strongly mediated the observed social influence, suggesting an adaptive basis for such influence.
先前的研究表明,慷慨行为的接受者自身也会表现得更加慷慨(一种直接的社会影响)。相比之下,关于间接影响的存在(即与慷慨行为的接受者互动是否会使一个人表现得更加慷慨)存在相互矛盾的证据,这让人怀疑利他行为是否能够通过社交网络传播开来。当前的研究调查了自私和慷慨行为在社交网络中能够传播多远,以及这种传播背后的认知机制。参与者进行了一系列包含链式网络的公共物品博弈。这个网络具有优势,因为它只允许单一、明确的影响路径。此外,我们通过实验操纵了链条中第一个环节的行为,使其表现得慷慨或自私。结果显示存在直接的社会影响,但没有间接影响的证据。结果还表明,自私行为的影响比慷慨行为大得多。最后,对未来伙伴行为的预期强烈地调节了观察到的社会影响,表明这种影响具有适应性基础。