Gerke Travis A, Martin Neil E, Ding Zhihu, Nuttall Elizabeth J, Stack Edward C, Giovannucci Edward, Lis Rosina T, Stampfer Meir J, Kantoff Phillip W, Parmigiani Giovanni, Loda Massimo, Mucci Lorelei A
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Prostate. 2015 Dec;75(16):1926-33. doi: 10.1002/pros.23090. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
We previously identified a protein tumor signature of PTEN, SMAD4, SPP1, and CCND1 that, together with clinical features, was associated with lethal outcomes among prostate cancer patients. In the current study, we sought to validate the molecular model using time-dependent measures of AUC and predictive values for discriminating lethal from non-lethal prostate cancer.
Using data from the initial study, we fit survival models for men with prostate cancer who were participants in the Physicians' Health Study (PHS; n = 276). Based on these models, we generated prognostic risk scores in an independent population, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS; n = 347) to evaluate external validity. In each cohort, men were followed prospectively from cancer diagnosis through 2011 for development of distant metastasis or cancer mortality. We measured protein tumor expression of PTEN, SMAD4, SPP1, and CCND1 on tissue microarrays.
During a median of 11.9 and 14.3 years follow-up in the PHS and HPFS cohorts, 24 and 32 men (9%) developed lethal disease. When used as a prognostic factor in a new population, addition of the four markers to clinical variables did not improve discriminatory accuracy through 15 years of follow-up.
Although the four markers have been identified as key biological mediators in metastatic progression, they do not provide independent, long-term prognostic information beyond clinical factors when measured at diagnosis. This finding may underscore the broad heterogeneity in aggressive prostate tumors and highlight the challenges that may result from overfitting in discovery-based research.
我们之前确定了由PTEN、SMAD4、SPP1和CCND1组成的蛋白质肿瘤特征,该特征与临床特征一起,与前列腺癌患者的致死结局相关。在当前研究中,我们试图使用AUC的时间依赖性测量方法和预测值来验证该分子模型,以区分致死性和非致死性前列腺癌。
利用初始研究的数据,我们为参与医生健康研究(PHS;n = 276)的前列腺癌男性患者拟合了生存模型。基于这些模型,我们在一个独立人群即健康专业人员随访研究(HPFS;n = 347)中生成了预后风险评分,以评估外部有效性。在每个队列中,男性从癌症诊断开始前瞻性随访至2011年,观察远处转移或癌症死亡的发生情况。我们在组织微阵列上测量了PTEN、SMAD4、SPP1和CCND1的蛋白质肿瘤表达。
在PHS和HPFS队列中,分别进行了中位11.9年和14.3年的随访,有24名和32名男性(9%)发生了致死性疾病。当在新人群中用作预后因素时,在临床变量基础上加入这四个标志物,在15年的随访中并未提高鉴别准确性。
尽管这四个标志物已被确定为转移进展中的关键生物介质,但在诊断时进行测量时,它们并不能提供超越临床因素的独立长期预后信息。这一发现可能突出了侵袭性前列腺肿瘤的广泛异质性,并凸显了基于发现的研究中过度拟合可能带来的挑战。