• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利奈唑胺个体化给药临床药学建议质量指标的1年回顾性审计:一石二鸟?

A 1 year retrospective audit of quality indicators of clinical pharmacological advice for personalized linezolid dosing: one stone for two birds?

作者信息

Pea Federico, Cojutti Piergiorgio, Dose Lucia, Baraldo Massimo

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Udine.

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medical Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Feb;81(2):341-8. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12806. Epub 2015 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1111/bcp.12806
PMID:26469887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4833151/
Abstract

AIM

This study explored the clinical and economic impact of clinical pharmacological advice (CPA) (based on therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] results, and on patients' characteristics and co-medications) on personalized linezolid therapy in a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

A 1 year retrospective analysis of quality indicators of CPA (clinicians' adherence rate to CPA, pre-post rate of linezolid trough concentrations within the desired range and cost balance analysis) was conducted.

RESULTS

Five hundred and forty-four CPAs were provided to clinicians during 2014 for personalizing linezolid therapy in 168 patients. Clinicians' adherence to CPAs was very high (94.7%). The pre-post rate of linezolid Cmin distribution showed a favourable impact of CPA on patient care (pre-post ratio of Cmin within the desired range + 23.4%, pre, 51.2% vs. post, 74.6%). Overall, linezolid dosage was mainly reduced (56.9% of cases), whereas dose augmentation was needed only in a minority of cases (7.7%). Cost balance analysis showed that overall 1258 standard doses of linezolid (unitary dose 600 mg) were spared for treating 168 patients with a personalized dosage for a median duration of 11 days (range 3-128 days) with a cost saving of 60038.05 €.

CONCLUSION

Active computerized advice elaborated by the clinical pharmacologist on the basis of TDM results and of patient's pathophysiological data and co-medications may be cost-effective for personalizing linezolid treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了临床药理学建议(CPA)(基于治疗药物监测[TDM]结果、患者特征和合并用药情况)对三级医院利奈唑胺个体化治疗的临床和经济影响。

方法

对CPA的质量指标进行了为期1年的回顾性分析(临床医生对CPA的依从率、利奈唑胺谷浓度在期望范围内的前后变化率以及成本平衡分析)。

结果

2014年期间,向临床医生提供了544条CPA,用于168例患者的利奈唑胺个体化治疗。临床医生对CPA的依从性非常高(94.7%)。利奈唑胺Cmin分布的前后变化率显示CPA对患者护理有积极影响(Cmin在期望范围内的前后变化率为+23.4%,之前为51.2%,之后为74.6%)。总体而言,利奈唑胺剂量主要降低(56.9%的病例),而仅在少数病例中需要增加剂量(7.7%)。成本平衡分析表明,在为168例患者进行中位疗程为11天(范围3 - 128天)的个体化给药治疗时,总共节省了1258个利奈唑胺标准剂量(单位剂量600 mg),节省成本60038.05欧元。

结论

临床药理学家根据TDM结果、患者病理生理数据和合并用药情况精心制定的主动计算机化建议,可能对利奈唑胺个体化治疗具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
A 1 year retrospective audit of quality indicators of clinical pharmacological advice for personalized linezolid dosing: one stone for two birds?利奈唑胺个体化给药临床药学建议质量指标的1年回顾性审计:一石二鸟?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Feb;81(2):341-8. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12806. Epub 2015 Dec 5.
2
A 10-Year Experience of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of Linezolid in a Hospital-wide Population of Patients Receiving Conventional Dosing: Is there Enough Evidence for Suggesting TDM in the Majority of Patients?利奈唑胺在全院接受常规剂量治疗患者中的治疗药物监测(TDM)10年经验:是否有足够证据建议对大多数患者进行TDM?
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Oct;121(4):303-308. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12797. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
3
Proposal of initial and maintenance dosing regimens with linezolid for renal impairment patients.利奈唑胺在肾功能损害患者中的初始和维持剂量方案的建议。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2021 Mar 4;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40360-021-00479-w.
4
Risk factors associated with high linezolid trough plasma concentrations.与高利奈唑胺谷血浆浓度相关的危险因素。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016 Jun;17(9):1183-7. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1182154. Epub 2016 May 11.
5
Systematic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Linezolid: Variability and Clinical Impact.利奈唑胺的系统治疗药物监测:变异性和临床影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Sep 22;61(10). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00687-17. Print 2017 Oct.
6
Linezolid dose adjustment according to therapeutic drug monitoring helps reach the goal concentration in severe patients, and the oldest seniors benefit more.根据治疗药物监测进行利奈唑胺剂量调整有助于达到重症患者的目标浓度,且高龄老年人获益更多。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):840. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08831-7.
7
Successful treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis with combination therapy using linezolid and rifampicin under therapeutic drug monitoring.在治疗药物监测下,使用利奈唑胺和利福平联合治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌骨髓炎取得成功。
J Infect Chemother. 2016 May;22(5):331-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
8
Therapeutic drug management of linezolid: a missed opportunity for clinicians?利奈唑胺的治疗药物管理:临床医生错失的机会?
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Dec;48(6):728-731. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.08.023. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
9
Linezolid Versus Vancomycin in the Empiric Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Cost-Utility Analysis Incorporating Results from the ZEPHyR Trial.利奈唑胺与万古霉素用于医院获得性肺炎的经验性治疗:一项纳入ZEPHyR试验结果的成本-效用分析
Value Health. 2015 Jul;18(5):614-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
10
Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Considerations for the Use of Linezolid in Overweight and Obese Adult Patients.超重和肥胖成年患者使用利奈唑胺的群体药代动力学和剂量考虑因素。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Aug;57(8):989-1000. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0606-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic impact of individualized antimicrobial dose optimization in the critically ill patient in Spain.西班牙重症患者个体化抗菌药物剂量优化的经济影响
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Feb 26;16:1506109. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1506109. eCollection 2025.
2
Pharmacology of emerging drugs for the treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.治疗耐多药结核病的新型药物药理学
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2024 Jul 27;37:100470. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100470. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid and exploring optimal regimens and a toxicity-related nomogram in elderly patients: a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study.利奈唑胺的治疗药物监测及探索老年患者的最佳方案和与毒性相关的列线图:一项多中心、前瞻性、非干预性研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Aug 1;79(8):1938-1950. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae188.
4
Therapeutics for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections.万古霉素耐药肠球菌血流感染的治疗方法。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2023 Jun 21;36(2):e0005922. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00059-22. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
Safety of linezolid in patients with decreased renal function and trough monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.利奈唑胺在肾功能下降患者中的安全性和谷浓度监测:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Nov 30;23(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40360-022-00628-9.
6
Vancomycin dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring practices: guidelines versus real-life.万古霉素给药及治疗药物监测实践:指南与实际情况对比
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Oct;43(5):1394-1403. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01266-7. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
7
Too Much of a Good Thing: Defining Antimicrobial Therapeutic Targets to Minimize Toxicity.过犹不及:确定抗菌治疗靶点以降低毒性。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Apr;109(4):905-917. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2190. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
8
Usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring of piperacillin and meropenem in routine clinical practice: a prospective cohort study in critically ill patients.哌拉西林和美罗培南治疗药物监测在常规临床实践中的应用:危重症患者的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Mar;27(e1):e30-e35. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001713. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
9
Empirical Study on the Transparency of Security Risk Information in Chinese Listed Pharmaceutical Enterprises Based on the ANP-DS Method.基于 ANP-DS 方法的中国上市药企安全风险信息透明度实证研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2020 Feb 14;2020:4109354. doi: 10.1155/2020/4109354. eCollection 2020.
10
Reappraisal of Linezolid Dosing in Renal Impairment To Improve Safety.重新评估肾功能损害患者中利奈唑胺的剂量以提高安全性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jul 25;63(8). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00605-19. Print 2019 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Therapeutic drug monitoring: linezolid too?治疗药物监测:利奈唑胺也需要吗?
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 15;18(5):525. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0525-x.
2
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of linezolid in hospitalized paediatric patients: a step toward dose optimization by means of therapeutic drug monitoring and Monte Carlo simulation.利奈唑胺在住院儿科患者中的药代动力学/药效学评价:通过治疗药物监测和蒙特卡罗模拟实现剂量优化的一步。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Jan;70(1):198-206. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku337. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
3
Variability of linezolid concentrations after standard dosing in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.危重症患者标准剂量用药后利奈唑胺血药浓度的变异性:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2014 Jul 10;18(4):R148. doi: 10.1186/cc13984.
4
Therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of tuberculosis: an update.结核病治疗中的治疗药物监测:更新。
Drugs. 2014 Jun;74(8):839-54. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0222-8.
5
Individualised antibiotic dosing for patients who are critically ill: challenges and potential solutions.个体化抗生素剂量给药用于危重症患者:挑战与潜在解决方案。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Jun;14(6):498-509. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70036-2. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
6
Educational and organizational interventions to improve the usefulness of clinical pharmacological advice for personalized drug dosing based on therapeutic drug monitoring.基于治疗药物监测的教育和组织干预措施,以提高临床药理学建议在个性化给药方面的实用性。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Nov;115(5):432-7. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12249. Epub 2014 May 3.
7
Linezolid underexposure in a hypothyroid patient on levothyroxine replacement therapy: a case report.左甲状腺素替代治疗的甲状腺功能减退患者中利奈唑胺暴露不足:一例报告
Ther Drug Monit. 2014 Oct;36(5):687-9. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000069.
8
Biliary pharmacodynamic exposure to linezolid in two liver transplant patients.两名肝移植患者中利奈唑胺的胆汁药效学暴露情况。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Feb;69(2):567-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt382. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
9
Therapeutic drug monitoring for tomorrow.明天的治疗药物监测。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 May;69 Suppl 1:25-32. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1504-x. Epub 2013 May 3.
10
High plasma linezolid concentration and impaired renal function affect development of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia.高血浆利奈唑胺浓度和肾功能受损影响利奈唑胺诱导的血小板减少症的发生。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Sep;68(9):2128-33. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt133. Epub 2013 Apr 26.