Suppr超能文献

利奈唑胺个体化给药临床药学建议质量指标的1年回顾性审计:一石二鸟?

A 1 year retrospective audit of quality indicators of clinical pharmacological advice for personalized linezolid dosing: one stone for two birds?

作者信息

Pea Federico, Cojutti Piergiorgio, Dose Lucia, Baraldo Massimo

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Santa Maria Della Misericordia, Udine.

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medical Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Feb;81(2):341-8. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12806. Epub 2015 Dec 5.

Abstract

AIM

This study explored the clinical and economic impact of clinical pharmacological advice (CPA) (based on therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] results, and on patients' characteristics and co-medications) on personalized linezolid therapy in a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

A 1 year retrospective analysis of quality indicators of CPA (clinicians' adherence rate to CPA, pre-post rate of linezolid trough concentrations within the desired range and cost balance analysis) was conducted.

RESULTS

Five hundred and forty-four CPAs were provided to clinicians during 2014 for personalizing linezolid therapy in 168 patients. Clinicians' adherence to CPAs was very high (94.7%). The pre-post rate of linezolid Cmin distribution showed a favourable impact of CPA on patient care (pre-post ratio of Cmin within the desired range + 23.4%, pre, 51.2% vs. post, 74.6%). Overall, linezolid dosage was mainly reduced (56.9% of cases), whereas dose augmentation was needed only in a minority of cases (7.7%). Cost balance analysis showed that overall 1258 standard doses of linezolid (unitary dose 600 mg) were spared for treating 168 patients with a personalized dosage for a median duration of 11 days (range 3-128 days) with a cost saving of 60038.05 €.

CONCLUSION

Active computerized advice elaborated by the clinical pharmacologist on the basis of TDM results and of patient's pathophysiological data and co-medications may be cost-effective for personalizing linezolid treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了临床药理学建议(CPA)(基于治疗药物监测[TDM]结果、患者特征和合并用药情况)对三级医院利奈唑胺个体化治疗的临床和经济影响。

方法

对CPA的质量指标进行了为期1年的回顾性分析(临床医生对CPA的依从率、利奈唑胺谷浓度在期望范围内的前后变化率以及成本平衡分析)。

结果

2014年期间,向临床医生提供了544条CPA,用于168例患者的利奈唑胺个体化治疗。临床医生对CPA的依从性非常高(94.7%)。利奈唑胺Cmin分布的前后变化率显示CPA对患者护理有积极影响(Cmin在期望范围内的前后变化率为+23.4%,之前为51.2%,之后为74.6%)。总体而言,利奈唑胺剂量主要降低(56.9%的病例),而仅在少数病例中需要增加剂量(7.7%)。成本平衡分析表明,在为168例患者进行中位疗程为11天(范围3 - 128天)的个体化给药治疗时,总共节省了1258个利奈唑胺标准剂量(单位剂量600 mg),节省成本60038.05欧元。

结论

临床药理学家根据TDM结果、患者病理生理数据和合并用药情况精心制定的主动计算机化建议,可能对利奈唑胺个体化治疗具有成本效益。

相似文献

4
Risk factors associated with high linezolid trough plasma concentrations.与高利奈唑胺谷血浆浓度相关的危险因素。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016 Jun;17(9):1183-7. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1182154. Epub 2016 May 11.
8
Therapeutic drug management of linezolid: a missed opportunity for clinicians?利奈唑胺的治疗药物管理:临床医生错失的机会?
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Dec;48(6):728-731. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.08.023. Epub 2016 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

2
Pharmacology of emerging drugs for the treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.治疗耐多药结核病的新型药物药理学
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2024 Jul 27;37:100470. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100470. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Therapeutics for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections.万古霉素耐药肠球菌血流感染的治疗方法。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2023 Jun 21;36(2):e0005922. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00059-22. Epub 2023 Apr 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Therapeutic drug monitoring: linezolid too?治疗药物监测:利奈唑胺也需要吗?
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 15;18(5):525. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0525-x.
9
Therapeutic drug monitoring for tomorrow.明天的治疗药物监测。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 May;69 Suppl 1:25-32. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1504-x. Epub 2013 May 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验