Aubry Anaël, Hausswirth Christophe, Louis Julien, Coutts Aaron J, Buchheit Martin, Le Meur Yann
Laboratory of Sport, Expertise and Performance (INSEP), EA, 7370, National Institute of Sport, Expertise and Performance, Paris, France.
Laboratory of Sport, Expertise and Performance (INSEP), EA, 7370, National Institute of Sport, Expertise and Performance, Paris, France; Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Tom Reilly building, L3 3AF, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0139754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139754. eCollection 2015.
The aim of the study was to investigate whether heart rate recovery (HRR) may represent an effective marker of functional overreaching (f-OR) in endurance athletes.
Thirty-one experienced male triathletes were tested (10 control and 21 overload subjects) before (Pre), and immediately after an overload training period (Mid) and after a 2-week taper (Post). Physiological responses were assessed during an incremental cycling protocol to exhaustion, including heart rate, catecholamine release and blood lactate concentration. Ten participants from the overload group developed signs of f-OR at Mid (i.e. -2.1 ± 0.8% change in performance associated with concomitant high perceived fatigue). Additionally, only the f-OR group demonstrated a 99% chance of increase in HRR during the overload period (+8 ± 5 bpm, large effect size). Concomitantly, this group also revealed a >80% chance of decreasing blood lactate (-11 ± 14%, large), plasma norepinephrine (-12 ± 37%, small) and plasma epinephrine peak concentrations (-51 ± 22%, moderate). These blood measures returned to baseline levels at Post. HRR change was negatively correlated to changes in performance, peak HR and peak blood metabolites concentrations.
These findings suggest that i) a faster HRR is not systematically associated with improved physical performance, ii) changes in HRR should be interpreted in the context of the specific training phase, the athletes perceived level of fatigue and the performance response; and, iii) the faster HRR associated with f-OR may be induced by a decreased central command and by a lower chemoreflex activity.
本研究旨在调查心率恢复(HRR)是否可作为耐力运动员功能性过度训练(f-OR)的有效标志物。
对31名经验丰富的男性铁人三项运动员进行测试(10名对照组和21名超负荷组受试者),测试时间分别为超负荷训练期之前(Pre)、超负荷训练期结束后即刻(Mid)以及为期2周的减量期之后(Post)。在递增式自行车运动至疲劳的过程中评估生理反应,包括心率、儿茶酚胺释放和血乳酸浓度。超负荷组中有10名参与者在Mid时出现了f-OR的体征(即表现下降2.1±0.8%,同时伴有较高的主观疲劳感)。此外,只有f-OR组在超负荷训练期心率恢复有99%的增加可能性(+8±5次/分钟,效应量较大)。与此同时,该组血乳酸(-11±14%,效应量较大)、血浆去甲肾上腺素(-12±37%,效应量较小)和血浆肾上腺素峰值浓度(-51±22%,效应量中等)下降的可能性也超过80%。这些血液指标在Post时恢复到基线水平。心率恢复变化与表现、心率峰值和血液代谢物峰值浓度的变化呈负相关。
这些发现表明,i)心率恢复加快并非系统性地与身体表现改善相关;ii)心率恢复的变化应结合特定的训练阶段、运动员主观疲劳程度和表现反应来解释;iii)与f-OR相关的心率恢复加快可能是由中枢指令降低和化学反射活动减弱引起的。