Fuhrer Jürg, Val Martin Maria, Mills Gina, Heald Colette L, Harmens Harry, Hayes Felicity, Sharps Katrina, Bender Jürgen, Ashmore Mike R
Agroscope Climate/Air Pollution Group Zurich Switzerland.
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
Ecol Evol. 2016 Nov 21;6(24):8785-8799. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2568. eCollection 2016 Dec.
Risks associated with exposure of individual plant species to ozone (O) are well documented, but implications for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes have received insufficient attention. This is an important gap because feedbacks to the atmosphere may change as future O levels increase or decrease, depending on air quality and climate policies. Global simulation of O using the Community Earth System Model (CESM) revealed that in 2000, about 40% of the Global 200 terrestrial ecoregions (ER) were exposed to O above thresholds for ecological risks, with highest exposures in North America and Southern Europe, where there is field evidence of adverse effects of O, and in central Asia. Experimental studies show that O can adversely affect the growth and flowering of plants and alter species composition and richness, although some communities can be resilient. Additional effects include changes in water flux regulation, pollination efficiency, and plant pathogen development. Recent research is unraveling a range of effects belowground, including changes in soil invertebrates, plant litter quantity and quality, decomposition, and nutrient cycling and carbon pools. Changes are likely slow and may take decades to become detectable. CESM simulations for 2050 show that O exposure under emission scenario RCP8.5 increases in all major biomes and that policies represented in scenario RCP4.5 do not lead to a general reduction in O risks; rather, 50% of ERs still show an increase in exposure. Although a conceptual model is lacking to extrapolate documented effects to ERs with limited or no local information, and there is uncertainty about interactions with nitrogen input and climate change, the analysis suggests that in many ERs, O risks will persist for biodiversity at different trophic levels, and for a range of ecosystem processes and feedbacks, which deserves more attention when assessing ecological implications of future atmospheric pollution and climate change.
单个植物物种暴露于臭氧(O₃)所带来的风险已有充分记录,但对陆地生物多样性和生态系统过程的影响却未得到足够关注。这是一个重要的空白,因为根据空气质量和气候政策,随着未来臭氧水平的上升或下降,对大气的反馈可能会发生变化。使用社区地球系统模型(CESM)对臭氧进行的全球模拟显示,在2000年,全球200个陆地生态区域(ER)中约40%暴露于高于生态风险阈值的臭氧环境中,北美、南欧(有臭氧负面影响的实地证据)以及中亚地区的暴露程度最高。实验研究表明,臭氧会对植物的生长和开花产生不利影响,并改变物种组成和丰富度,尽管有些群落具有恢复力。其他影响还包括水分通量调节、授粉效率以及植物病原体发展的变化。最近的研究正在揭示一系列地下影响,包括土壤无脊椎动物的变化、植物凋落物的数量和质量、分解以及养分循环和碳库。这些变化可能很缓慢,可能需要数十年才能被察觉。CESM对2050年的模拟显示,在排放情景RCP8.5下,所有主要生物群落中的臭氧暴露都会增加,而情景RCP4.5中所代表的政策并不会导致臭氧风险普遍降低;相反,50%的生态区域仍显示暴露增加。尽管缺乏一个概念模型来将已记录的影响外推到当地信息有限或没有当地信息的生态区域,并且与氮输入和气候变化的相互作用存在不确定性,但分析表明,在许多生态区域,臭氧风险将持续影响不同营养级的生物多样性以及一系列生态系统过程和反馈,这在评估未来大气污染和气候变化的生态影响时值得更多关注。