• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Chemomechanical removal of pulpal and dentinal debris with sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide vs normal saline solution.

作者信息

Svec T A, Harrison J W

出版信息

J Endod. 1977 Feb;3(2):49-53. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(77)80015-0.

DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(77)80015-0
PMID:264933
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Chemomechanical removal of pulpal and dentinal debris with sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide vs normal saline solution.用次氯酸钠和过氧化氢与生理盐水进行牙髓和牙本质碎屑的化学机械去除。
J Endod. 1977 Feb;3(2):49-53. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(77)80015-0.
2
The effect of effervescence on debridement of the apical regions of root canals in single-rooted teeth.泡腾对单根牙根管根尖区清创的影响。
J Endod. 1981 Jul;7(7):335-40. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(81)80102-1.
3
[Efficiency of various irrigation technics and solutions in removing debris from the interior of root canals].[不同冲洗技术和冲洗液在清除根管内部碎屑方面的效率]
Rev Reg Aracatuba Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 1982;3(1):21-7.
4
Irrigation of the root canal system.根管系统冲洗
Dent Clin North Am. 1984 Oct;28(4):797-808.
5
[Comparative analysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the effect of intracanal irrigation with various chemical agents].[使用扫描电子显微镜（SEM）对不同化学药剂进行根管冲洗效果的对比分析]
Mondo Odontostomatol. 1985 Jul-Aug;27(4):29-37.
6
Antimicrobial effect of root canal débridement in teeth with immature root. A clinical and microbiologic study.未成熟牙根牙齿根管清创的抗菌效果。一项临床和微生物学研究。
Odontol Revy. 1976;27(1):1-10.
7
Effect of antioxidant on coronal seal of dentin following sodium-hypochlorite and hydrogen-peroxide irrigation.抗氧化剂对次氯酸钠和过氧化氢冲洗后牙本质冠部封闭的影响。
Am J Dent. 2006 Dec;19(6):348-52.
8
Effect of root canal irrigants on cervical dentine permeability to hydrogen peroxide.根管冲洗剂对颈部牙本质过氧化氢渗透性的影响。
Int Endod J. 2008 Oct;41(10):821-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01446.x. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
9
Antimicrobial activity and effectiveness of a combination of sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide in killing and removing Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms from surfaces.次氯酸钠和过氧化氢组合对杀灭和去除表面铜绿假单胞菌生物膜的抗菌活性及效果
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Oct;103(4):794-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03299.x.
10
[Root canal morphology and debridement after chemomechanical preparation in vivo].[体内化学机械预备后根管形态与清创]
Stomatologia (Athenai). 1972;29(1):67-83.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibacterial effect of silver diamine fluoride and potassium iodide against E. faecalis, A. naeslundii and P. micra.银氨氟化物和碘化钾对粪肠球菌、奈瑟菌和微小消化链球菌的抗菌效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01531-1.
2
Quantification of Bacterial Colonization in Dental Hard Tissues Using Optimized Molecular Biological Methods.使用优化的分子生物学方法对牙齿硬组织中的细菌定植进行定量分析。
Front Genet. 2020 Dec 18;11:599137. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.599137. eCollection 2020.
3
Evaluation of 2% Chlorhexidine and 2% Sodium Fluoride as Endodontic Irrigating Solutions on Root Dentine Microhardness: An In Vitro Study.
2%洗必泰和2%氟化钠作为根管冲洗液对牙根牙本质显微硬度影响的体外研究
Eur J Dent. 2021 May;15(2):253-258. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1717053. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
4
Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.下颌第一前磨牙根管根尖三分之一处五种不同冲洗技术对玷污层去除效果的比较：一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019 Nov 14;9(6):630-636. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_267_19. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
5
Is it really penetration? Part 2. Locomotion of Enterococcus faecalis cells within dentinal tubules of bovine teeth.真的是穿透吗？第 2 部分。粪肠球菌细胞在牛牙牙本质小管内的运动。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Dec;23(12):4325-4334. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02865-5. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
6
How efficacious are , , Guduchi extracts and chlorhexidine as intracanal disinfectants? A comparative study.印度藤、匙羹藤提取物和洗必泰作为根管内消毒剂的效果如何？一项比较研究。
Ayu. 2017 Jan-Jun;38(1-2):70-75. doi: 10.4103/ayu.AYU_72_16.
7
Comparative evaluation of effect of different irrigation solutions against Enterococcus faecalis: A polymerase chain reaction-based study.不同冲洗液对粪肠球菌作用的比较评估：一项基于聚合酶链反应的研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S576-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163546.
8
Apical pressure created during irrigation with the GentleWave™ system compared to conventional syringe irrigation.与传统注射器冲洗相比，使用GentleWave™系统冲洗时产生的根尖压力。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1525-34. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1632-z. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
9
Effectiveness of different irrigation techniques on smear layer removal in apical thirds of mesial root canals of permanent mandibular first molar: A scanning electron microscopic study.不同冲洗技术对恒牙下颌第一磨牙近中根管根尖三分之一处玷污层去除效果的扫描电子显微镜研究
J Conserv Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):321-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.159742.