Durgin Tracy, Witt Edward A, Fishman Jesse
UCB Pharma, Smyrna, Georgia, United States of America.
Kantar Health, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 26;10(10):e0140632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140632. eCollection 2015.
RLSOBJECTIVES: To evaluate the humanistic and economic burden of a restless legs syndrome (RLS) diagnosis with regard to health-related quality of life, work productivity loss, healthcare resource use, and direct and indirect costs.
Self-reported data came from the 2012 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS), a large, annual, nationally representative cross-sectional general health survey of US adults.
RLS patients (n = 2,392) were matched on demographic and health characteristics to Non-RLS respondents via propensity score matching differences between groups were tested with Bivariate and multivariable analyses.
RLS patients had significantly lower health-related quality of life scores: Mental Component Summary (44.60 vs. 48.92, p<.001), Physical Component Summary (40.57 vs. 46.78, p<.001), Health Utilities (.63 vs. .71, p<.001) and higher levels of work productivity loss in the past seven days including absenteeism (8.1% vs. 3.9%, p<.001), presenteeism (26.5% vs. 15.8%, p<.001), and overall productivity loss (30.1% vs. 18.1%, p<.001) as well as general activity impairment (46.1% vs. 29.7%, p<.001) [corrected]. RLS patients had significantly higher healthcare resource use in the past 6 months than non-RLS patients: healthcare provider visits (7.46 vs. 4.42%, p<.001), ER visits (0.45 vs. 0.24, p<.001), and hospitalizations (0.24 vs. 0.15, p<.001). RLS patients also had higher estimated direct and indirect costs than non-RLS patients. Finally, it was found that across outcomes increasing severity is associated with increased economic and humanistic burden for RLS patients.
RLS patients suffer a greater humanistic and economic burden than those without RLS. Moreover as severity increases so does the burden of RLS.
评估不宁腿综合征(RLS)诊断在健康相关生活质量、工作效率损失、医疗资源利用以及直接和间接成本方面的人文和经济负担。
自我报告数据来自2012年美国国家健康与幸福调查(NHWS),这是一项针对美国成年人的大型年度全国代表性横断面综合健康调查。
通过倾向得分匹配,将RLS患者(n = 2392)与非RLS受访者在人口统计学和健康特征上进行匹配,两组之间的差异通过双变量和多变量分析进行检验。
RLS患者的健康相关生活质量得分显著较低:心理成分总结(44.60对48.92,p <.001)、身体成分总结(40.57对46.78,p <.001)、健康效用(.63对.71,p <.001),并且在过去七天中工作效率损失水平更高,包括旷工(8.1%对3.9%,p <.001)、出勤主义(26.5%对15.8%,p <.001)以及总体工作效率损失(30.1%对18.1%,p <.001),还有一般活动受损(46.1%对29.7%,p <.001)[校正后]。在过去6个月中,RLS患者的医疗资源利用显著高于非RLS患者:就诊于医疗服务提供者(7.46%对4.42%,p <.001)、急诊就诊(0.45对0.24,p <.001)以及住院(0.24对0.15,p <.001)。RLS患者的估计直接和间接成本也高于非RLS患者。最后,研究发现,在各项结果中,RLS患者病情严重程度增加与经济和人文负担增加相关。
RLS患者比无RLS的患者承受更大的人文和经济负担。此外,随着病情严重程度增加,RLS的负担也会增加。