Burns Joseph D, Rindler Rima Sestokas, Carr Christopher, Lau Helena, Cervantes-Arslanian Anna M, Green-LaRoche Deborah M, Salem Rony, Kase Carlos S
Department of Neurology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2016 Apr;24(2):172-9. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0211-0.
Basilar artery stroke causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Although its unusual clinical presentation potentially contributes to a delay in diagnosis, this problem has not been systematically studied. We compared intervals between symptom onset, initial presentation, and diagnosis in stroke due to basilar artery (BA) versus left middle cerebral artery (LMCA) occlusion to determine the presence of and potential reasons for diagnostic delay in BA stroke.
We retrospectively identified 21 consecutive adult patients diagnosed with BA stroke between 2009 and 2011 from our hospital's prospective stroke registry. Patients were age-, sex-, and race-matched with 21 LMCA stroke patients from the same period. All subjects had confirmed clinical and radiographic diagnosis of stroke due to occlusion or stenosis of the BA, LMCA, or left internal carotid artery. Time to diagnosis was determined independently by two investigators through medical record review. The pre-specified primary outcome was latency from emergency department (ED) arrival to stroke diagnosis.
Median time from ED arrival to diagnosis was 8 h 24 min (IQR: 2:43-26:32) for BA and 1 h 23 min (IQR: 0:41-1:45; p < 0.001) for LMCA. Median time from symptom onset to ED arrival was 7 h 44 min (IQR 1:23-21:30) for BA and 1 h 2 min (IQR 0:36-9:41; p = 0.06) for LMCA. Four of 21 (19 %) BA patients were diagnosed within a 4-h time frame to make intravenous thrombolysis possible compared to 13 of 21 (62 %) LMCA patients (p = 0.01).
Our results suggest that both pre-hospital and in-hospital processes cause substantial, clinically significant delays in the diagnosis of BA stroke.
基底动脉卒中会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。尽管其不寻常的临床表现可能会导致诊断延迟,但这一问题尚未得到系统研究。我们比较了基底动脉(BA)闭塞与左大脑中动脉(LMCA)闭塞所致卒中在症状发作、首次就诊和诊断之间的时间间隔,以确定BA卒中诊断延迟的存在情况及潜在原因。
我们从本院前瞻性卒中登记处回顾性地确定了2009年至2011年期间连续诊断为BA卒中的21例成年患者。患者在年龄、性别和种族方面与同期21例LMCA卒中患者相匹配。所有受试者均经临床和影像学确诊为因BA、LMCA或左颈内动脉闭塞或狭窄所致的卒中。两名研究人员通过病历审查独立确定诊断时间。预先设定的主要结局是从急诊科(ED)就诊到卒中诊断的延迟时间。
BA患者从ED就诊到诊断的中位时间为8小时24分钟(四分位间距:2小时43分钟 - 26小时32分钟),LMCA患者为1小时23分钟(四分位间距:0小时41分钟 - 1小时45分钟;p < 0.001)。BA患者从症状发作到ED就诊的中位时间为7小时44分钟(四分位间距1小时23分钟 - 21小时30分钟),LMCA患者为1小时2分钟(四分位间距0小时36分钟 - 9小时41分钟;p = 0.06)。21例BA患者中有4例(19%)在4小时内确诊,从而有可能进行静脉溶栓,而21例LMCA患者中有13例(62%)(p = 0.01)。
我们的结果表明,院前和院内流程均导致BA卒中诊断出现显著的、具有临床意义的延迟。