Csendes A, Braghetto I, Henríquez A, Cortés C
Department of Surgery and Radiology, University of Chile, Santiago.
Gut. 1989 Mar;30(3):299-304. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.3.299.
Late results in 81 patients with achalasia treated in a prospective randomised study comparing forceful pneumatic dilatation with the Mosher bag and surgical anterior oesophagomyotomy by abdominal route, are reported. There were no deaths from either of the treatments. Two patients (5.6%) had a perforation of the abdominal oesophagus after pneumatic dilatation and were excluded from late follow up. In patients having surgery at radiological evaluation there was gullet diameter significantly increased at the oesophagogastric junction and decreased at the middle third of the oesophagus. One patient was lost from follow up and one died of an oesophageal carcinoma, leaving 95% of excellent results at the late follow up (median 62 months). Resting gastro-oesophageal sphincter pressure decreased significantly to approximately 10 mmHg; this was maintained five years after surgery. By contrast, in patients having pneumatic dilatation, there were good results in only 65% (follow up median 58 months), with 30% failures. One patient was lost from follow up and one developed oesophageal carcinoma. Measurement of resting gastro-oesophageal sphincter pressure after dilatation was highly predictive of the outcome. The study shows that surgical treatment offers a better final clinical result than pneumatic dilatation with the Mosher bag.
本文报告了一项前瞻性随机研究的晚期结果,该研究比较了强力气囊扩张术(使用莫舍尔袋)与经腹手术行食管前肌层切开术对81例贲门失弛缓症患者的治疗效果。两种治疗方法均无死亡病例。两名患者(5.6%)在气囊扩张术后发生了腹段食管穿孔,被排除在晚期随访之外。在接受手术的患者中,经放射学评估发现食管胃交界处的食管直径显著增加,而食管中段的直径减小。一名患者失访,一名患者死于食管癌,晚期随访时的优良率为95%(中位随访时间62个月)。静息时胃食管括约肌压力显著降低至约10 mmHg;术后五年维持该水平。相比之下,接受气囊扩张术的患者中,仅有65%取得了良好效果(中位随访时间58个月),失败率为30%。一名患者失访,一名患者发生了食管癌。扩张术后静息时胃食管括约肌压力的测量对结果具有高度预测性。该研究表明,手术治疗比使用莫舍尔袋进行气囊扩张术能提供更好的最终临床效果。