• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Late results of a prospective randomised study comparing forceful dilatation and oesophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia.一项比较贲门失弛缓症患者强力扩张术与食管肌层切开术的前瞻性随机研究的远期结果
Gut. 1989 Mar;30(3):299-304. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.3.299.
2
[Treatment of achalasia using balloon dilatation].[使用球囊扩张术治疗贲门失弛缓症]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1990 Sep 8;120(36):1304-7.
3
An audit of pneumatic dilatation and oesophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia cardia.贲门失弛缓症患者气囊扩张术与食管肌层切开术的审计。
Trop Gastroenterol. 1994 Jul-Sep;15(3):152-6.
4
Pneumatic balloon dilatation in primary achalasia: the long-term follow-up results.原发性贲门失弛缓症的气囊扩张术:长期随访结果
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Mar-Apr;52(62):475-80.
5
Prospective clinical and manometric study comparing pneumatic dilatation and sublingual nifedipine in the treatment of oesophageal achalasia.一项前瞻性临床和测压研究,比较气囊扩张术和舌下含服硝苯地平治疗食管贲门失弛缓症的效果。
Gut. 1991 Jun;32(6):604-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.32.6.604.
6
Long-term effects of pneumatic dilatation on symptoms and lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in achalasia.气囊扩张术对贲门失弛缓症症状及食管下括约肌压力的长期影响。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002 Apr;37(4):380-4. doi: 10.1080/003655202317315980.
7
Laparoscopic Heller myotomy relieves dysphagia in patients with achalasia and low LES pressure following pneumatic dilatation.腹腔镜下Heller肌切开术可缓解贲门失弛缓症患者在气囊扩张后出现的吞咽困难及较低的食管下括约肌压力。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):687-90. doi: 10.1007/s004640080098. Epub 2001 May 11.
8
Forceful dilatation under endoscopic control in the treatment of achalasia: a randomised trial of pneumatic versus metallic dilator.内镜控制下强力扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症:气囊扩张与金属扩张器的随机试验
Gut. 1994 Oct;35(10):1360-2. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.10.1360.
9
Predictors of short term treatment outcome in patients with achalasia following endoscopic or surgical therapy.贲门失弛缓症患者内镜或手术治疗后短期治疗效果的预测因素。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Nov-Dec;59(120):2503-7. doi: 10.5754/hge11284.
10
Health economic evaluation of therapeutic strategies in patients with idiopathic achalasia: results of a randomized trial comparing pneumatic dilatation with laparoscopic cardiomyotomy.特发性贲门失弛缓症患者治疗策略的卫生经济学评估:一项比较气囊扩张术与腹腔镜贲门肌切开术的随机试验结果
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1184-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9310-0. Epub 2007 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic Heller's cardiomyotomy for achalasia: early outcomes for a high-volume UK centre.机器人辅助 Heller 肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症:大容量英国中心的早期结果。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Apr;106(4):353-358. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0065. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
2
Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Influential Publications in Achalasia Research from 1995 to 2020.食管失弛缓症研究中最具影响力出版物的范围回顾和文献计量分析 1995 年至 2020 年。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Feb 4;2021:8836395. doi: 10.1155/2021/8836395. eCollection 2021.
3
Does laparoscopic reoperation yield symptomatic improvements similar to those of primary laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia patients?腹腔镜再次手术是否能在贲门失弛缓症患者中产生与初次腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术相似的症状改善效果?
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):4991-5000. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07978-7. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
4
Pneumatic balloon dilatation versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia: a failed attempt at meta-analysis.气囊扩张与腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的比较:荟萃分析的失败尝试。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Feb;35(2):602-611. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07421-x. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
5
The 100 most cited manuscripts in esophageal motility disorders: a bibliometric analysis.食管动力障碍领域被引用次数最多的100篇手稿:一项文献计量分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jul;7(14):310. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.34.
6
POEM in the Treatment of Esophageal Disorders.经口内镜下肌切开术治疗食管疾病
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;16(1):27-40. doi: 10.1007/s11938-018-0168-0.
7
The choice of optimal antireflux procedure after laparoscopic cardiomyotomy: two decades of clinical experience in one center.腹腔镜贲门肌切开术后最佳抗反流手术的选择:一个中心的二十年临床经验
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Sep;12(3):238-244. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.68547. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
8
[Laparoscopic Heller myotomy after failed POEM and multiple balloon dilatations : Better late than never].[经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)失败及多次气囊扩张术后行腹腔镜Heller肌切开术:迟做总比不做好]
Chirurg. 2017 Apr;88(4):303-306. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0332-9.
9
The early efficacy of Heller myotomy in the treatment of Iranian patients with achalasia.赫勒肌切开术治疗伊朗贲门失弛缓症患者的早期疗效。
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2016 Winter;9(1):30-5.
10
[Transthoracic myotomy of a case of giant megaesophagus in Mali hospital].[马里医院一例巨大型巨食管的经胸肌切开术]
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Aug 4;21:239. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.239.7410. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective randomized study comparing forceful dilatation and esophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia of the esophagus.
Gastroenterology. 1981 Apr;80(4):789-95.
2
The role of bougienage in the management of achalasia--the need for reappraisal.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1982 Aug;28(3):169-72. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(82)73044-5.
3
New approach to esophagocardiomyotomy: report of forty cases.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982 Oct;84(4):575-8.
4
Management of achalasia of the cardia by forced pneumatic dilatation.通过强力气囊扩张术治疗贲门失弛缓症
Gut. 1982 Jun;23(6):541-4. doi: 10.1136/gut.23.6.541.
5
Effects of total fundoplication on function of the esophagus after myotomy for achalasia.贲门失弛缓症肌切开术后全胃底折叠术对食管功能的影响。
Am J Surg. 1982 Jan;143(1):22-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90124-6.
6
Pneumatic dilatation in achalasia.贲门失弛缓症的气囊扩张术
Gut. 1983 Nov;24(11):1020-3. doi: 10.1136/gut.24.11.1020.
7
Treatment of achalasia of the esophagus.
Surg Clin North Am. 1983 Aug;63(4):963-70. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)43097-5.
8
Operation for esophageal achalasia. Results of esophagomyotomy without an antireflux operation.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984 Sep;88(3):344-51.
9
To dilate or to operate? That is the question.扩张还是手术?这就是问题所在。
Gut. 1983 Nov;24(11):1013-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.24.11.1013.
10
Esophagomyotomy for esophageal achalasia: experimental, clinical, and manometric aspects.食管贲门失弛缓症的食管肌层切开术:实验、临床及测压方面
Ann Surg. 1967 Oct;166(4):640-56. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196710000-00012.

一项比较贲门失弛缓症患者强力扩张术与食管肌层切开术的前瞻性随机研究的远期结果

Late results of a prospective randomised study comparing forceful dilatation and oesophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia.

作者信息

Csendes A, Braghetto I, Henríquez A, Cortés C

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Radiology, University of Chile, Santiago.

出版信息

Gut. 1989 Mar;30(3):299-304. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.3.299.

DOI:10.1136/gut.30.3.299
PMID:2651226
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1378449/
Abstract

Late results in 81 patients with achalasia treated in a prospective randomised study comparing forceful pneumatic dilatation with the Mosher bag and surgical anterior oesophagomyotomy by abdominal route, are reported. There were no deaths from either of the treatments. Two patients (5.6%) had a perforation of the abdominal oesophagus after pneumatic dilatation and were excluded from late follow up. In patients having surgery at radiological evaluation there was gullet diameter significantly increased at the oesophagogastric junction and decreased at the middle third of the oesophagus. One patient was lost from follow up and one died of an oesophageal carcinoma, leaving 95% of excellent results at the late follow up (median 62 months). Resting gastro-oesophageal sphincter pressure decreased significantly to approximately 10 mmHg; this was maintained five years after surgery. By contrast, in patients having pneumatic dilatation, there were good results in only 65% (follow up median 58 months), with 30% failures. One patient was lost from follow up and one developed oesophageal carcinoma. Measurement of resting gastro-oesophageal sphincter pressure after dilatation was highly predictive of the outcome. The study shows that surgical treatment offers a better final clinical result than pneumatic dilatation with the Mosher bag.

摘要

本文报告了一项前瞻性随机研究的晚期结果,该研究比较了强力气囊扩张术(使用莫舍尔袋)与经腹手术行食管前肌层切开术对81例贲门失弛缓症患者的治疗效果。两种治疗方法均无死亡病例。两名患者(5.6%)在气囊扩张术后发生了腹段食管穿孔,被排除在晚期随访之外。在接受手术的患者中,经放射学评估发现食管胃交界处的食管直径显著增加,而食管中段的直径减小。一名患者失访,一名患者死于食管癌,晚期随访时的优良率为95%(中位随访时间62个月)。静息时胃食管括约肌压力显著降低至约10 mmHg;术后五年维持该水平。相比之下,接受气囊扩张术的患者中,仅有65%取得了良好效果(中位随访时间58个月),失败率为30%。一名患者失访,一名患者发生了食管癌。扩张术后静息时胃食管括约肌压力的测量对结果具有高度预测性。该研究表明,手术治疗比使用莫舍尔袋进行气囊扩张术能提供更好的最终临床效果。