Chen Pei-Chun, Tung Ying-Chang, Wu Patricia W, Wu Lung-Sheng, Lin Yu-Sheng, Chang Chee-Jen, Kung Suefang, Chu Pao-Hsien
From the Clinical Informatics and Medical Statistics Research Center (PCC, CJC); Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taipei (YCT, LSW, YSL, PHC); Department of Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou (PWW); Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Dentistry, Division of Periodontology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; and Cheers Dental Clinic, New Taipei, Taiwan (SK); Healthcare Center (PHC); and Heart Failure Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan (PHC).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(43):e1826. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001826.
Infective endocarditis (IE) is an uncommon but potentially devastating disease. Recently published data have revealed a significant increase in the incidence of IE following the restriction on indications for antibiotic prophylaxis as recommended by the revised guidelines. This study aims to reexamine the basic assumption behind the rationale of prophylaxis that dental procedures increase the risk of IE.Using the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database of Taiwan, we retrospectively analyzed a total of 739 patients hospitalized for IE between 1999 and 2012. A case-crossover design was conducted to compare the odds of exposure to dental procedures within 3 months preceding hospitalization with that during matched control periods when no IE developed.In the unadjusted model, the odds ratio (OR) was 0.93 for tooth extraction (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-1.59), 1.64 for surgery (95% CI 0.61-4.42), 0.92 for dental scaling (95% CI 0.59-1.42), 1.69 for periodontal treatment (95% CI 0.88-3.21), and 1.29 for endodontic treatment (95% CI 0.72-2.31). The association between dental procedures and the risk of IE remained insignificant after adjustment for antibiotic use, indicating that dental procedures did not increase the risk of IE.Therefore, this result may argue against the conventional assumption on which the recommended prophylaxis for IE is based.
感染性心内膜炎(IE)是一种罕见但可能具有毁灭性的疾病。最近公布的数据显示,按照修订指南对抗生素预防适应症进行限制后,IE的发病率显著上升。本研究旨在重新审视预防措施基本原理背后的一个假设,即牙科手术会增加IE的风险。利用台湾纵向健康保险数据库,我们回顾性分析了1999年至2012年间因IE住院的739例患者。采用病例交叉设计,比较住院前3个月内接受牙科手术的几率与未发生IE的匹配对照期内接受牙科手术的几率。在未调整模型中,拔牙的比值比(OR)为0.93(95%置信区间[CI]0.54 - 1.59),手术为1.64(95%CI 0.61 - 4.42),洗牙为0.92(95%CI 0.59 - 1.42),牙周治疗为1.69(95%CI 0.88 - 3.21),根管治疗为1.29(95%CI 0.72 - 2.31)。在对使用抗生素进行调整后,牙科手术与IE风险之间的关联仍然不显著,这表明牙科手术不会增加IE的风险。因此,这一结果可能与IE推荐预防措施所基于的传统假设相悖。