• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威急诊科的疼痛评估。

Assessment of pain in a Norwegian Emergency Department.

作者信息

Dale Jostein, Bjørnsen Lars Petter

机构信息

Emergency Department, Clinic of Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Care, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Oct 29;23:86. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0166-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13049-015-0166-3
PMID:26514633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4625614/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although pain management is a fundamental aspect of care in emergency departments (EDs), inadequate treatment of pain is unfortunately common. There are multiple local protocols for pain assessment in the ED. This study evaluated whether the initial assessment and treatment of pain in the ED are in accordance with the in-hospital protocol of the ED at a Norwegian University Hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective data on pain assessment and initial treatment in the ED were collected from nursing and physician documentation. The patients' perceptions of subjective pain were recorded using a numerical rating scale (NRS) that ranged from 0 to 10.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven percent of the 764 enrolled patients were evaluated for pain at arrival. Female patients had a higher probability of not being asked about pain, but there was no difference in the percentage of patients asked about pain with respect to age. Additionally, patients with low oxygen saturation and systolic blood pressure were less likely to be asked about pain. Of those with moderate and severe pain (58 %), only 14 % received pain relief.

DISCUSSION

Assessment and treatment of pain in the ED are inadequate and not in line with the local protocols. A focus on strategies to improve pain treatment in the ED is a necessary aspect of developing optimal acute patient care in Norway in the future.

摘要

背景

尽管疼痛管理是急诊科护理的一个基本方面,但遗憾的是,疼痛治疗不足的情况很常见。急诊科有多种疼痛评估的本地方案。本研究评估了挪威一家大学医院急诊科对疼痛的初始评估和治疗是否符合急诊科的院内方案。

材料与方法

从护理和医生记录中收集急诊科疼痛评估和初始治疗的前瞻性数据。使用0至10的数字评分量表(NRS)记录患者对主观疼痛的感知。

结果

764名登记患者中,77%在到达时接受了疼痛评估。女性患者未被询问疼痛情况的可能性更高,但就年龄而言,被询问疼痛情况的患者百分比没有差异。此外,血氧饱和度和收缩压较低的患者被询问疼痛情况的可能性较小。在中度和重度疼痛患者(58%)中,只有14%得到了疼痛缓解。

讨论

急诊科对疼痛的评估和治疗不足,不符合本地方案。关注改善急诊科疼痛治疗的策略是未来挪威发展最佳急性患者护理的一个必要方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7f/4625614/c6d413ebb388/13049_2015_166_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7f/4625614/c6d413ebb388/13049_2015_166_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b7f/4625614/c6d413ebb388/13049_2015_166_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of pain in a Norwegian Emergency Department.挪威急诊科的疼痛评估。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Oct 29;23:86. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0166-3.
2
Efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia for patients with acute abdominal pain in the emergency department: a randomized trial.急诊患者中患者自控镇痛对急性腹痛的疗效:一项随机试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;19(4):370-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01322.x.
3
Self-reported pain relief interventions of patients before emergency department arrival.患者在抵达急诊科之前自我报告的疼痛缓解干预措施。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2016 Sep;28:20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
4
Demographic, Clinical, and Health System Characteristics Associated With Pain Assessment Documentation and Pain Severity in U.S. Military Patients in Combat Zone Emergency Departments, 2010-2013.2010 - 2013年美国战区急诊科作战部队患者疼痛评估记录及疼痛严重程度相关的人口统计学、临床和卫生系统特征
J Trauma Nurs. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(5):257-74. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000231.
5
A comparison of pain assessment by physicians, parents and children in an outpatient setting.门诊环境中医师、家长和儿童对疼痛评估的比较。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Mar;34(3):138-144. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205825. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
6
Patient and physician perceptions as risk factors for oligoanalgesia: a prospective observational study of the relief of pain in the emergency department.患者和医生的认知作为低剂量镇痛的风险因素:急诊科疼痛缓解的前瞻性观察研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;13(2):140-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.008. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
7
The influence of triage systems and triage scores on timeliness of ED analgesic administration.分诊系统和分诊分数对急诊科镇痛药物给药及时性的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;26(8):867-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.020.
8
No gender-related bias in acute musculoskeletal pain management in the emergency department.急诊科急性肌肉骨骼疼痛管理中不存在性别相关偏见。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Feb;32(2):149-52. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202716. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Percentage of pain intensity difference on an 11-point numerical rating scale underestimates acute pain resolution.11点数字评分量表上疼痛强度差异的百分比低估了急性疼痛的缓解情况。
Eur J Pain. 2014 Sep;18(8):1103-11. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.00452.x. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
The patient vs. caregiver perception of acute pain in the emergency department.患者与护理人员对急诊科急性疼痛的认知
J Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(99)00153-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining the need for analgesia in the emergency department: protocol for an international Delphi process.确定急诊科镇痛需求:国际德尔菲法流程方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 22;15(3):e089396. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089396.
2
Improving pain management for trauma patients at two Rwandan emergency departments.改善卢旺达两个急诊科创伤患者的疼痛管理。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2024 Dec;14(4):258-262. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2024.08.009. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
3
Exploring Non-Invasive Salivary Biomarkers for Acute Pain Diagnostics: A Comprehensive Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality indicators for the assessment and management of pain in the emergency department: a systematic review.急诊科疼痛评估与管理的质量指标:一项系统综述
Pain Res Manag. 2014 Nov-Dec;19(6):e179-90. doi: 10.1155/2014/269140. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
2
Interventions to improve the management of pain in emergency departments: systematic review and narrative synthesis.改善急诊科疼痛管理的干预措施:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Emerg Med J. 2014 Oct;31(e1):e9-e18. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203079. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
3
The International Federation for Emergency Medicine framework for quality and safety in the emergency department.
探索用于急性疼痛诊断的非侵入性唾液生物标志物:一项综合综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 31;13(11):1929. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111929.
4
The Pain Management of Trauma Patients in the Emergency Department.急诊科创伤患者的疼痛管理
J Clin Med. 2023 May 5;12(9):3289. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093289.
5
Clinical assessment and risk stratification for prehospital use of methoxyflurane versus standard analgesia in adult patients with trauma pain.成年创伤疼痛患者院前使用甲氧氟烷与标准镇痛的临床评估及风险分层
Turk J Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 27;23(2):65-74. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_229_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
6
Acute Pain Management and Perceptions among Emergency Healthcare Workers: Feedback from Greece.急诊医护人员的急性疼痛管理与认知:来自希腊的反馈
Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2023 Jan 14;29(1):22-31. doi: 10.2478/rjaic-2022-0004. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Differences in acute pain perception between patients and physicians in the emergency department.急诊科患者与医生在急性疼痛感知上的差异。
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 10;8(11):e11462. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11462. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
Training pain management to nursing students: Designing, implementing, and evaluating a mobile-based application.对护理专业学生进行疼痛管理培训:设计、实施和评估一款基于移动设备的应用程序。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Oct 29;10:379. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1496_20. eCollection 2021.
9
Inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox) for analgesia in trauma: a systematic review protocol.吸入甲氧氟烷(Penthrōx)用于创伤镇痛:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 3;10(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01600-0.
10
Low-Dose Methoxyflurane versus Standard of Care Analgesics for Emergency Trauma Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pooled Data.低剂量甲氧氟烷与急诊创伤疼痛护理标准镇痛药的比较:汇总数据的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Pain Res. 2021 Jan 20;14:93-105. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S292521. eCollection 2021.
国际急诊医学联合会急诊科质量与安全框架
Emerg Med J. 2014 Nov;31(11):926-9. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203000. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
4
An ethical framework for the management of pain in the emergency department.急诊科疼痛管理的伦理框架。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;20(7):716-23. doi: 10.1111/acem.12158.
5
The acute sick and injured patients: an overview of the emergency department patient population at a Norwegian University Hospital Emergency Department.急性病和受伤患者:挪威一所大学医院急诊科患者人群概述。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;21(3):175-80. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3283629c18.
6
Reducing time to analgesia in the emergency department using a nurse-initiated pain protocol: a before-and-after study.
Contemp Nurse. 2012 Dec;43(1):29-37. doi: 10.5172/conu.2012.43.1.29.
7
Do ethnic differences still exist in pain assessment and treatment in the emergency department?
Pain Manag Nurs. 2012 Dec;13(4):194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.06.001.
8
Characteristics of effective interventions supporting quality pain management in Australian emergency departments: an exploratory study.澳大利亚急诊科支持优质疼痛管理的有效干预措施的特征:一项探索性研究。
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2012 Feb;15(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
9
Patient visits to the emergency department at a Norwegian university hospital: variations in patient gender and age, timing of visits, and patient acuity.挪威大学附属医院急诊患者就诊情况:患者性别和年龄、就诊时间和患者病情严重程度的差异。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Jun;30(6):462-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201191. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
10
Assessing patient pain scores in the emergency department.在急诊科评估患者的疼痛评分。
Malays J Med Sci. 2010 Jan;17(1):17-22.