Schild von Spannenberg Stephan, Jones Gareth T, Macfarlane Gary J
Department of Public Health, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Aberdeen Pain Research Collaboration (Epidemiology Group), School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Br J Pain. 2012 Nov;6(4):166-9. doi: 10.1177/2049463712466323.
It has been suggested that older persons are less likely to receive optimal care for pain, and a recent population study suggested that management of low back pain (LBP) in primary care differed with older age. Low back pain is the most commonly reported regional pain syndrome, and the objective of the current review was to determine the evidence base for managing LBP in older persons; specifically, to ascertain if randomized controlled trials provide information on the effectiveness of two common non-pharmacological treatments (manual therapy, physical activity/exercise) for LBP amongst older patients. We examine data from trials which contributed to the United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on the management of LBP and determine whether the trials had upper age restrictions, their justification and whether any age-specific analyses had been conducted. The present survey included 21 studies of manual therapy and 71 of physical activity/exercise. Many studies had an upper age limit of ≤ 60 years (24% manual therapy, 44% physical activity/exercise) or 61-70 years (33%, 41%) but few gave a rationale for imposing an upper age limit in the trial eligibility criteria (2 out of 17 studies of manual therapy, 4 out of 68 studies of physical activity/exercise). Only 14% of studies of manual therapy and 1% of physical activity/exercise studies provided an age-specific analysis. Upper age limits in back pain trials of manual therapy and physical activity/exercise are common but a justification for these is rarely given. Almost no studies have reported whether effectiveness differs by age.
有人认为老年人获得最佳疼痛护理的可能性较小,最近一项人群研究表明,初级保健中腰痛(LBP)的管理因年龄较大而有所不同。腰痛是最常报告的局部疼痛综合征,本次综述的目的是确定老年人腰痛管理的证据基础;具体而言,确定随机对照试验是否提供了关于两种常见非药物治疗(手法治疗、体育活动/锻炼)对老年患者腰痛有效性的信息。我们检查了为英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)腰痛管理指南提供数据的试验数据,并确定这些试验是否有年龄上限限制、其理由以及是否进行了任何针对特定年龄的分析。本次调查包括21项手法治疗研究和71项体育活动/锻炼研究。许多研究的年龄上限为≤60岁(手法治疗为24%,体育活动/锻炼为44%)或61 - 70岁(分别为33%和41%),但很少有研究在试验纳入标准中说明设定年龄上限的理由(手法治疗的17项研究中有2项,体育活动/锻炼的68项研究中有4项)。只有14%的手法治疗研究和1%的体育活动/锻炼研究提供了针对特定年龄的分析。手法治疗和体育活动/锻炼的腰痛试验中年龄上限很常见,但很少给出其理由。几乎没有研究报告有效性是否因年龄而异。