Robson Philip M, Madhuranthakam Ananth J, Smith Martin P, Sun Maryellen R M, Dai Weiying, Rofsky Neil M, Pedrosa Ivan, Alsop David C
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, AN-226, Boston, MA 02215.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Acad Radiol. 2016 Feb;23(2):144-54. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
Renal perfusion measurements using noninvasive arterial spin-labeled (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging techniques are gaining interest. Currently, focus has been on perfusion in the context of renal transplant. Our objectives were to explore the use of ASL in patients with renal cancer, and to evaluate three-dimensional (3D) fast spin echo (FSE) acquisition, a robust volumetric imaging method for abdominal applications. We evaluate 3D ASL perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in the kidneys compared to two-dimensional (2D) ASL in patients and healthy subjects.
Isotropic resolution (2.6 × 2.6 × 2.8 mm(3)) 3D ASL using segmented FSE was compared to 2D single-shot FSE. ASL used pseudo-continuous labeling, suppression of background signal, and synchronized breathing. Quantitative perfusion values and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were compared between 3D and 2D ASL in four healthy volunteers and semiquantitative assessments were made by four radiologists in four patients with known renal masses (primary renal cell carcinoma).
Renal cortex perfusion in healthy subjects was 284 ± 21 mL/100 g/min, with test-retest repeatability of 8.8%. No significant differences were found between the quantitative perfusion value and SNR in volunteers between 3D ASL and 2D ASL, or in 3D ASL with synchronized or free breathing. In patients, semiquantitative assessment by radiologists showed no significant difference in image quality between 2D ASL and 3D ASL. In one case, 2D ASL missed a high perfusion focus in a mass that was seen by 3D ASL.
3D ASL renal perfusion imaging provides isotropic-resolution images, with comparable quantitative perfusion values and image SNR in similar imaging time to single-slice 2D ASL.
使用无创动脉自旋标记(ASL)磁共振成像技术进行肾脏灌注测量正受到越来越多的关注。目前,重点在于肾移植背景下的灌注。我们的目的是探讨ASL在肾癌患者中的应用,并评估三维(3D)快速自旋回波(FSE)采集,这是一种适用于腹部应用的强大容积成像方法。我们在患者和健康受试者中比较了肾脏的3D ASL灌注磁共振成像与二维(2D)ASL。
将使用分段FSE的各向同性分辨率(2.6×2.6×2.8 mm³)3D ASL与2D单次激发FSE进行比较。ASL采用伪连续标记、背景信号抑制和同步呼吸。比较了四名健康志愿者3D和2D ASL之间的定量灌注值和信噪比(SNR),并由四名放射科医生对四名已知肾肿块(原发性肾细胞癌)患者进行了半定量评估。
健康受试者的肾皮质灌注为284±21 mL/100 g/min,重测重复性为8.8%。在志愿者中,3D ASL和2D ASL之间的定量灌注值和SNR,或3D ASL在同步呼吸或自由呼吸时均未发现显著差异。在患者中,放射科医生的半定量评估显示2D ASL和3D ASL之间的图像质量无显著差异。在一个病例中,2D ASL遗漏了一个在3D ASL中可见的肿块内的高灌注灶。
3D ASL肾脏灌注成像提供各向同性分辨率图像,在与单层2D ASL相似的成像时间内具有可比的定量灌注值和图像SNR。