Woodward Brianna M, Zadoroznyj Maria, Benoit Cecilia
School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Women Birth. 2016 Apr;29(2):153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
The provision of post-birth care in the community is changing substantially in many parts of Australia including Queensland, where there has been a burgeoning of clinics in private retail outlets such as pharmacies. Little is known about women's experiences of post-birth care in community pharmacies, nor of how their experiences compare with those in publicly-funded Child and Family Health Clinics (CFHC).
To provide qualitative insights into women's experiences of the different forms of post-birth care in the community, and identify where improvements could be made to service provision.
A purposive sample of mothers of infants aged under 12 months was recruited to maximise variation in the use of private and public postnatal care services. Semi structured interviews were conducted with fifteen mothers whose antenatal, birthing and post-birth experiences varied across public and private sectors and birthing providers.
Concerns about lack of information and psychosocial support following discharge from hospital were widely reported, particularly by women who had given birth in a private facility under the care of a private obstetrician. Women used both pharmacy nurses and CFHCs. Pharmacy nurses were generally preferred for their accessibility, psychosocial support for mother, and continuity of care. However, these services are unregulated and without quality assurance mechanisms. Mothers found CFHCs regimented, focused on infant surveillance rather than support for mothers, and difficult to access.
There is a clear need for community post-birth care that will provide mothers with the information and psychosocial support they need. Currently, private, home-birth midwives and pharmacy nurses are providing women-centred care more effectively than nurses in publicly funded CFHC or GPs. This seems to be linked to continuity of carer, and to service priorities, resulting in inequities and systematic variations in the quality of post-birth care. Further research on this important health care issue is recommended.
在澳大利亚的许多地区,包括昆士兰州,社区产后护理服务正在发生重大变化,私人零售场所如药店中涌现出大量诊所。对于女性在社区药店接受产后护理的体验,以及她们的体验与由公共资金资助的儿童与家庭健康诊所(CFHC)的体验相比如何,人们知之甚少。
深入了解女性在社区中接受不同形式产后护理的体验,并确定在服务提供方面可以改进的地方。
招募了一个有目的的样本,即12个月以下婴儿的母亲,以最大限度地增加使用私人和公共产后护理服务的差异。对15名母亲进行了半结构化访谈,她们的产前、分娩和产后经历在公共和私营部门以及分娩服务提供者之间各不相同。
广泛报道了对出院后缺乏信息和心理社会支持的担忧,尤其是那些在私立产科医生照料下在私立机构分娩的女性。女性同时使用药店护士和CFHC。药店护士通常因其可及性、对母亲的心理社会支持以及护理的连续性而更受青睐。然而,这些服务缺乏监管且没有质量保证机制。母亲们发现CFHC过于刻板,专注于婴儿监测而非对母亲的支持,且难以获得服务。
显然需要社区产后护理服务,为母亲提供她们所需的信息和心理社会支持。目前,私人家庭分娩助产士和药店护士比由公共资金资助的CFHC或全科医生提供的以女性为中心的护理更有效。这似乎与护理人员的连续性以及服务重点有关,导致产后护理质量存在不公平和系统性差异。建议对这一重要的医疗保健问题进行进一步研究。