• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物伦理学、宗教与公共政策:交叉点、相互作用及解决方案

Bioethics, Religion, and Public Policy: Intersections, Interactions, and Solutions.

作者信息

Kahn Peter A

机构信息

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.

出版信息

J Relig Health. 2016 Oct;55(5):1546-60. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0144-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10943-015-0144-0
PMID:26525211
Abstract

Bioethics in America positions itself as a totalizing discipline, capable of providing guidance to any individual within the boundaries of a health or medical setting. Yet the religiously observant or those driven by spiritual values have not universally accepted decisions made by "secular" bioethics, and as a result, religious bioethical thinkers and adherents have developed frameworks and rich counter-narratives used to fend off encroachment by policies perceived as threatening. This article uses brain death in Jewish law, the case of Jahi McMath, and vaccination refusal to observe how the religious system of ethics is presently excluded from bioethics and its implications.

摘要

美国的生物伦理学将自身定位为一门具有总体性的学科,能够在健康或医疗环境范围内为任何个人提供指导。然而,遵守宗教教义者或受精神价值观驱使的人并未普遍接受“世俗”生物伦理学所做出的决定,因此,宗教生物伦理思想家及其追随者已经制定了相关框架和丰富的反驳观点,以抵御他们认为具有威胁性的政策的侵蚀。本文通过犹太律法中的脑死亡、贾希·麦克马思案以及拒绝接种疫苗的案例,来观察宗教伦理体系目前是如何被排除在生物伦理学之外及其所产生的影响。

相似文献

1
Bioethics, Religion, and Public Policy: Intersections, Interactions, and Solutions.生物伦理学、宗教与公共政策:交叉点、相互作用及解决方案
J Relig Health. 2016 Oct;55(5):1546-60. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0144-0.
2
Jewish ethics and xenotransplantation.犹太伦理与异种移植
Xenotransplantation. 2016 Jul;23(4):258-68. doi: 10.1111/xen.12247. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
3
Religious traditions and public policy.宗教传统与公共政策。
Assia Jew Med Ethics. 1988 May;1(1):17-24.
4
Bioethics for clinicians: 22. Jewish bioethics.临床医生的生物伦理学:22. 犹太生物伦理学。
CMAJ. 2001 Jan 23;164(2):219-22.
5
Bioethics and the contemporary Jewish community.生物伦理学与当代犹太社区
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Jul-Aug;20(4):S14-7.
6
Talking ethics with strangers: a view from Jewish tradition.与陌生人探讨伦理道德:来自犹太传统的视角。
J Med Philos. 1993 Dec;18(6):549-67. doi: 10.1093/jmp/18.6.549.
7
Method in Jewish bioethics: an overview.犹太生物伦理学方法概述
J Contemp Law. 1994;20(2):325-52.
8
Navigating the chasm between religious and secular perspectives in modern bioethics.在现代生物伦理学中跨越宗教与世俗观点之间的鸿沟。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jun;35(6):357-60. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.028399.
9
Reform Judaism, bioethics, and abortion.改革派犹太教、生物伦理学与堕胎
J Reform Jud. 1990 Winter;37(1):43-59.
10
Bioethics: secular philosophy, Jewish law and modern medicine.生物伦理学:世俗哲学、犹太律法与现代医学。
Isr J Med Sci. 1989 Jul;25(7):404-9.

引用本文的文献

1
On Religious Influence in Bioethics: The Limits of Pluriversalism.论宗教对生物伦理学的影响:多元普遍主义的局限
Bioethics. 2025 Jul;39(6):620-629. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13419. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
2
Does the Uniform Determination of Death Act Need to Be Revised?《统一死亡判定法案》是否需要修订?
Linacre Q. 2020 Aug;87(3):317-333. doi: 10.1177/0024363920926018. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
3
Religious exception for vaccination or religious excuses for avoiding vaccination.疫苗接种的宗教豁免或避免接种疫苗的宗教理由。

本文引用的文献

1
Why brain death is considered death and why there should be no confusion.为什么脑死亡被视为死亡以及为何不应存在混淆。
Neurology. 2014 Oct 14;83(16):1464-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000883. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
2
Notes from the field: measles outbreak among members of a religious community - Brooklyn, New York, March-June 2013.现场记录:宗教团体成员麻疹疫情爆发 - 纽约布鲁克林,2013 年 3 月至 6 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Sep 13;62(36):752-3.
3
Brain death and the courts.脑死亡与法庭
Croat Med J. 2016 Oct 31;57(5):516-521. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.516.
4
When Brain Death Belies Belief.当脑死亡与信仰相悖时。
J Relig Health. 2016 Dec;55(6):2199-213. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0298-4.
Neurology. 2011 Mar 1;76(9):837-41. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820e7bbe.
4
Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.基于证据的指南更新:成人脑死亡判定:美国神经病学学会质量标准分委会的报告。
Neurology. 2010 Jun 8;74(23):1911-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e242a8.
5
Deadly pluralism? Why death-concept, death-definition, death-criterion and death-test pluralism should be allowed, even though it creates some problems.致命的多元论?为何应允许死亡概念、死亡定义、死亡标准和死亡检测的多元论,即便它会引发一些问题。
Bioethics. 2009 Oct;23(8):450-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00669.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
6
Factors associated with refusal of childhood vaccines among parents of school-aged children: a case-control study.学龄儿童家长中与拒绝儿童疫苗相关的因素:一项病例对照研究。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 May;159(5):470-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.5.470.
7
Childhood immunization refusal: provider and parent perceptions.儿童免疫接种拒绝:医护人员与家长的看法
Fam Med. 2004 Jun;36(6):431-9.
8
Patterns of vaccination acceptance.疫苗接种接受模式。
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Dec;49(12):1705-16. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00239-7.
9
Brain death, religious freedom, and public policy: New Jersey's landmark legislative initiative.脑死亡、宗教自由与公共政策:新泽西州具有里程碑意义的立法举措
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1991 Dec;1(4):275-92. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0068.
10
The problem of brain death: development and history.脑死亡问题:发展历程
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1978 Nov 17;315:19-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1978.tb50327.x.