• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单独使用抗生素与阑尾切除术治疗成人单纯性急性阑尾炎:荟萃分析怎么说?

Antibiotics alone versus appendectomy to treat uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults: what do meta-analyses say?

作者信息

Rocha Leonardo Lima, Rossi Felipe Martin Bianco, Pessoa Camila Menezes Souza, Campos Flavia Nunes Dias, Pires Carlos Eduardo Fonseca, Steinman Milton

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil ; Telemedicine Service, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 2 andar, bloco D, São Paulo, CEP: 05651-901 Brazil.

Surgery Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Oct 31;10:51. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0046-1. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1186/s13017-015-0046-1
PMID:26526329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4628279/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary appendectomy is the current standard of care for treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis, but interest in conservative treatment with antibiotics alone has been increasing in recent years. Clinical trials so far have shown controversial results.

METHODS

A series of meta-analyses were reviewed. Studies comparing surgery versus antibiotics alone for treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults were included. Descriptive statistics and data on treatment effects were retrieved and summarized.

RESULTS

The conservative approach has a success rate of around 60 % and is associated with shorter pain duration, reduced analgesic medication, faster resolution of the inflammation process, lower expenses and quicker return to work. On the other hand, medical treatment leads to high (up to 20 %) readmission rates and more often requires surgery. An operative approach is associated with higher treatment success rates (>90 %) and very a low mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

Based on the current body of evidence, the use of antibiotics for primary treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis cannot be routinely recommended. Appendectomy remains the gold-standard treatment.

摘要

背景

一期阑尾切除术是目前治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的标准治疗方法,但近年来,单独使用抗生素进行保守治疗的关注度不断提高。迄今为止的临床试验结果存在争议。

方法

回顾了一系列的荟萃分析。纳入了比较手术与单独使用抗生素治疗成人单纯性急性阑尾炎的研究。检索并总结了描述性统计数据和治疗效果数据。

结果

保守治疗方法的成功率约为60%,且与疼痛持续时间缩短、止痛药物使用减少、炎症过程消退更快、费用降低以及更快恢复工作有关。另一方面,药物治疗导致高(高达20%)再入院率,且更常需要手术。手术治疗方法的治疗成功率更高(>90%),死亡率极低。

结论

基于目前的证据,不能常规推荐使用抗生素对单纯性急性阑尾炎进行初始治疗。阑尾切除术仍然是金标准治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Antibiotics alone versus appendectomy to treat uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults: what do meta-analyses say?单独使用抗生素与阑尾切除术治疗成人单纯性急性阑尾炎:荟萃分析怎么说?
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Oct 31;10:51. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0046-1. eCollection 2015.
2
Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendectomy for acute uncomplicated (no abscess or phlegmon) appendicitis.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性(无脓肿或蜂窝织炎)阑尾炎的随机试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2012 Apr;13(2):74-84. doi: 10.1089/sur.2011.058. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
3
Are Antibiotics the New Appendectomy?抗生素会成为新的阑尾切除术吗?
Cureus. 2023 Sep 1;15(9):e44506. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44506. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
[Can acute appendicitis be treated by antibiotics and in what conditions?].[急性阑尾炎能用抗生素治疗吗?在什么情况下可以?]
J Chir (Paris). 2009 Oct;146 Spec No 1:17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jchir.2009.08.033. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
5
A National Evaluation of the Conservative Management of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: How Common Is This and What Are the Issues.非复杂性急性阑尾炎保守治疗的全国性评估:其常见程度如何以及存在哪些问题。
Dig Surg. 2015;32(5):325-30. doi: 10.1159/000434756. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
6
Patient perspectives on antibiotics for appendicitis at one hospital.一家医院里患者对阑尾炎抗生素治疗的看法。
J Surg Res. 2016 Apr;201(2):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.11.016. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
7
A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.对疑似患有急性阑尾炎患者进行腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的荟萃分析。
Can J Surg. 1999 Oct;42(5):377-83.
8
Surgery versus Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Appendicitis: Which Would a Medical Student Want?单纯性阑尾炎的手术治疗与抗生素治疗:医学生更倾向于哪种?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Nov/Dec;18(8):868-873. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.129. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
9
The Efficacy of Conservative Management in Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis - A Single-Center Retrospective Study.非复杂性急性阑尾炎保守治疗的疗效——一项单中心回顾性研究
Cureus. 2022 Dec 16;14(12):e32606. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32606. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon).一项比较保守治疗与急性阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎(脓肿或蜂窝织炎)的荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2010 Jun;147(6):818-29. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.013. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Conservative Versus Surgical Management of Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review.急性阑尾炎的保守治疗与手术治疗:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jan 21;16(1):e52697. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52697. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Are the immature granulocyte count and percentage important in continue medical treatment in acute appendicitis? A prospective, randomized, and controlled study.不成熟粒细胞计数和百分比在急性阑尾炎继续治疗中重要吗?一项前瞻性、随机和对照研究。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Jul;28(7):979-987. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.76307.
3
Relative CT number of periappendiceal fat stranding may be an applicable index for estimating the severity of acute appendicitis.阑尾周围脂肪条索征的相对 CT 值可能是评估急性阑尾炎严重程度的一个适用指标。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Apr 1;94(1120):20200437. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200437. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Laparoscopic appendectomy vs antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis: a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter cohort study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与急性阑尾炎抗生素治疗的比较:一项来自多中心队列研究的倾向评分匹配分析。
Updates Surg. 2017 Dec;69(4):531-540. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0499-8. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
5
The immune impact of mimic endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy and appendectomy on rabbits of acute appendicitis.模拟内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗与阑尾切除术对急性阑尾炎家兔的免疫影响
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 15;8(39):66528-66539. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16236. eCollection 2017 Sep 12.
6
Prospective validation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a diagnostic and management adjunct in acute appendicitis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为急性阑尾炎诊断和治疗辅助指标的前瞻性验证
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 May;187(2):379-384. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1667-z. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
7
Long-Term Results Following Antibiotic Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in Adults.成人急性阑尾炎抗生素治疗后的长期结果
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2245-2250. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3987-6.
8
Acute appendicitis: Epidemiology, treatment and outcomes- analysis of 16544 consecutive cases.急性阑尾炎:16544例连续病例的流行病学、治疗及结果分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Oct 27;8(10):693-699. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i10.693.
9
Mortality Related to Appendectomy; a Population Based Analysis over Two Decades in Finland.与阑尾切除术相关的死亡率;芬兰二十年的基于人群的分析。
World J Surg. 2017 Jan;41(1):64-69. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3688-6.
10
International normalized ratio and serum C-reactive protein are feasible markers to predict complicated appendicitis.国际标准化比值和血清C反应蛋白是预测复杂性阑尾炎的可行标志物。
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jun 21;11:31. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0081-6. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的比较:APPAC 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2340-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6154.
2
Appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis is associated with fewer complications than conservative antibiotic management: a meta-analysis of post-intervention complications.阑尾切除术治疗疑似单纯性阑尾炎的并发症少于保守的抗生素治疗:一项干预后并发症的荟萃分析。
J Infect. 2015 Feb;70(2):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
3
Meta-analysis of the therapeutic effects of antibiotic versus appendicectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis.抗生素与阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎疗效的Meta分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2014 May;7(5):1181-1186. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1584. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
4
The NOTA Study (Non Operative Treatment for Acute Appendicitis): prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) for treating patients with right lower quadrant abdominal pain and long-term follow-up of conservatively treated suspected appendicitis.NOTA 研究(急性阑尾炎非手术治疗):前瞻性研究抗生素(阿莫西林和克拉维酸)治疗右下腹痛患者的疗效和安全性,以及对保守治疗疑似阑尾炎的长期随访。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jul;260(1):109-17. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000560.
5
The value of biochemical markers in predicting a perforation in acute appendicitis.生化标志物在预测急性阑尾炎穿孔中的价值。
ANZ J Surg. 2013 Jan;83(1-2):79-83. doi: 10.1111/ans.12032. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
6
Antibiotic administration can be an independent risk factor for therapeutic delay of pediatric acute appendicitis.抗生素的使用可能是小儿急性阑尾炎治疗延迟的一个独立危险因素。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):792-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182628810.
7
Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.抗生素与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的安全性和有效性比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 5;344:e2156. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2156.
8
Acute perforated appendicitis: an analysis of risk factors to guide surgical decision making.急性穿孔性阑尾炎:指导手术决策的危险因素分析
Indian J Med Sci. 2010 Feb;64(2):58-65.
9
Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendectomy for acute uncomplicated (no abscess or phlegmon) appendicitis.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性(无脓肿或蜂窝织炎)阑尾炎的随机试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2012 Apr;13(2):74-84. doi: 10.1089/sur.2011.058. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
10
Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD008359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2.