• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗版奈梅亨问卷在伊朗哮喘患者中的信度和效度

Reliability and Validity of the Iranian Version of Nijmegen Questionnaire in Iranians with Asthma.

作者信息

Ravanbakhsh Majid, Nargesi Moslem, Raji Hanieh, Haddadzadeh Shoushtari Maryam

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

出版信息

Tanaffos. 2015;14(2):121-7.

PMID:26528366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4629426/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of Nijmegen questionnaire (NQ) translated to Farsi for diagnosis of the hyperventilation syndrome (HVS) in patients with asthma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The original version of NQ was translated to Farsi and then back-translated to English again to assess its agreement with the original version. To determine its cultural adaptation, a pilot study was carried out. The mean score of the questionnaire and the mean pressure of end tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) were compared in 100 asthmatic patients to determine the validity of the questionnaire. For reliability, 52 out of 100 patients randomly filled out the questionnaire with an interval of 5 to 10 days. Internal consistency and content validity of the questionnaire were assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient and by calculating floor and ceiling effects respectively. The exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure.

RESULTS

There was a significant inverse correlation between NQ scores and PETCO2 (P=-0.783). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was greater than 0.7, indicating good internal consistency of the questionnaire (P=0.702). The questionnaire had a good stability in an interval of 5 to 10 days (P=0.826). The NQ had no floor and ceiling effect. and also factor analysis of 16 scales showed that this questionnaire has a five-factor structure, which can describe 55% of data variance.

CONCLUSION

The Iranian version of the Nijmegen questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for detection of patients with HVS. In addition, the questionnaire can be used to evaluate the condition of respiratory function in people with asthma.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估翻译成波斯语的奈梅亨问卷(NQ)在诊断哮喘患者过度通气综合征(HVS)方面的有效性和可靠性。

材料与方法

将NQ的原始版本翻译成波斯语,然后再回译成英语以评估其与原始版本的一致性。为确定其文化适应性,开展了一项试点研究。比较了100例哮喘患者的问卷平均得分和呼气末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)以确定问卷的有效性。为评估可靠性,100例患者中的52例在5至10天的间隔内随机填写问卷。通过计算克朗巴哈系数评估问卷的内部一致性,通过计算地板效应和天花板效应评估内容效度。采用探索性因子分析评估因子结构。

结果

NQ得分与PETCO2之间存在显著负相关(P = -0.783)。克朗巴哈系数大于0.7,表明问卷具有良好的内部一致性(P = 0.702)。问卷在5至10天的间隔内具有良好的稳定性(P = 0.826)。NQ没有地板效应和天花板效应。对16个量表的因子分析表明,该问卷具有五因子结构,可解释55%的数据方差。

结论

伊朗版奈梅亨问卷是检测HVS患者的有效且可靠的工具。此外,该问卷可用于评估哮喘患者的呼吸功能状况。

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Iranian Version of Nijmegen Questionnaire in Iranians with Asthma.伊朗版奈梅亨问卷在伊朗哮喘患者中的信度和效度
Tanaffos. 2015;14(2):121-7.
2
Hyperventilation in asthma: a validation study of the Nijmegen Questionnaire--NQ.哮喘中的过度通气:奈梅亨问卷(NQ)的验证研究
J Asthma. 2014 Oct;51(8):839-46. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.922190. Epub 2014 May 29.
3
The Thai version of the Nijmegen questionnaire.奈梅亨问卷的泰语版本。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 13;8(12):e12296. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12296. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in Asthma.《奈梅亨问卷土耳其语版本在哮喘中的效度与信度》
Thorac Res Pract. 2023 Jul;24(4):194-201. doi: 10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.22198.
5
The Iranian version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) for assessment of psychological risk factors at work.用于评估工作中心理风险因素的伊朗版哥本哈根心理社会问卷(COPSOQ)。
Health Promot Perspect. 2016 Dec 18;7(1):7-13. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2017.03. eCollection 2017.
6
The modified patient enablement instrument: a Portuguese cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability study.改良患者赋权量表的葡萄牙语跨文化调适、效度和信度研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Jan 12;27:16087. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.87.
7
[Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 3.0 Asthma Modul].《儿童生活质量量表3.0版哮喘模块中文版的效度与信度》
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Dec;12(12):943-6.
8
Translation and psychometric testing of the Farsi version of the Seattle angina questionnaire.波斯语版西雅图心绞痛问卷的翻译及心理计量学测试。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Dec 2;15(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0808-4.
9
Urdu version of the neck disability index: a reliability and validity study.颈部功能障碍指数的乌尔都语版本:一项信效度研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Apr 8;18(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1469-5.
10
The quality of life in epidermolysis bullosa (EB-QoL) questionnaire: Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation into the Farsi language.大疱性表皮松解症生活质量(EB-QoL)问卷:翻译成波斯语、文化调适及效度验证
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2020 Jun 3;6(4):301-305. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2020.05.012. eCollection 2020 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cross-Cultured Validity and Reliability of the Vietnamese Nijmegen Questionnaire.越南奈梅亨问卷的跨文化效度与信度
Cureus. 2025 Feb 7;17(2):e78709. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78709. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Validity study of the Japanese version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire for verifying dysfunctional breathing in Japanese asthma patients.验证日本哮喘患者呼吸功能障碍的《奈梅亨问卷》日文版的效度研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 Apr 3;3(3):100247. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100247. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Validity and reliability of outcome measures to assess dysfunctional breathing: a systematic review.评估呼吸功能障碍的结局测量指标的有效性和可靠性:系统评价。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Apr 16;11(1):e001884. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001884.
4
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in Asthma.《奈梅亨问卷土耳其语版本在哮喘中的效度与信度》
Thorac Res Pract. 2023 Jul;24(4):194-201. doi: 10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.22198.
5
The Thai version of the Nijmegen questionnaire.奈梅亨问卷的泰语版本。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 13;8(12):e12296. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12296. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
The Optimal Cut-off Score of the Nijmegen Questionnaire for Diagnosing Hyperventilation Syndrome Using a Bayesian Model in the Absence of a Gold Standard.在缺乏金标准的情况下,使用贝叶斯模型诊断过度通气综合征的奈梅亨问卷最佳截断分数
Galen Med J. 2020 Jun 24;9:e1738. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v9i0.1738. eCollection 2020.
7
Disruption of Pathological Patterns in a Young Population with Dysfunctional Breathing.年轻人群中呼吸功能失调的病理模式破坏
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Sep 19;2020:9614574. doi: 10.1155/2020/9614574. eCollection 2020.
8
Association of dysfunctional breathing with health-related quality of life: A cross-sectional study in a young population.呼吸功能障碍与健康相关生活质量的关系:一项在年轻人群中的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205634. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Hyperventilation in asthma: a validation study of the Nijmegen Questionnaire--NQ.哮喘中的过度通气:奈梅亨问卷(NQ)的验证研究
J Asthma. 2014 Oct;51(8):839-46. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.922190. Epub 2014 May 29.
2
Relationship between dysfunctional breathing patterns and ability to achieve target heart rate variability with features of "coherence" during biofeedback.功能失调性呼吸模式与生物反馈期间通过“相干性”特征实现目标心率变异性的能力之间的关系。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2011 May-Jun;17(3):38-44.
3
Breathing and temporomandibular joint disease.呼吸与颞下颌关节疾病
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Jul;15(3):291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
4
Relationships between measures of dysfunctional breathing in a population with concerns about their breathing.一群对自身呼吸状况存在担忧的人群中,功能失调性呼吸各项测量指标之间的关系。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Jan;15(1):24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
5
Breathing evaluation and retraining in manual therapy.手法治疗中的呼吸评估与再训练
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2009 Jul;13(3):276-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
6
A systematic review of recent asthma symptom surveys in Iranian children.对伊朗儿童近期哮喘症状调查的系统评价。
Chron Respir Dis. 2009;6(2):109-14. doi: 10.1177/1479972309103884.
7
An observational investigation of dysfunctional breathing and breathing control therapy in a problem asthma clinic.问题哮喘诊所中功能失调性呼吸及呼吸控制疗法的观察性研究
J Asthma. 2008 Nov;45(9):758-65. doi: 10.1080/02770900802252093.
8
Can you diagnose hyperventilation?你能诊断出换气过度吗?
Chron Respir Dis. 2006;3(3):113-5. doi: 10.1191/1479972306cd116ed.
9
The prevalence of dysfunctional breathing in adults in the community with and without asthma.社区中患有和未患有哮喘的成年人呼吸功能障碍的患病率。
Prim Care Respir J. 2005 Apr;14(2):78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pcrj.2004.10.007.
10
[Prevalence of hyperventilation syndrome in patients treated for asthma in a pulmonology clinic].[呼吸内科门诊哮喘治疗患者中过度通气综合征的患病率]
Arch Bronconeumol. 2005 May;41(5):267-71. doi: 10.1016/s1579-2129(06)60221-8.