• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《奈梅亨问卷土耳其语版本在哮喘中的效度与信度》

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in Asthma.

作者信息

Çakmak Aslıhan, Şimşek Senem, İnal İnce Deniz, Sağlam Melda, Çalık Kütükcü Ebru, Vardar Yağlı Naciye, Karaya Gül

机构信息

Hacettepe University Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Turkey.

Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Chest Diseases, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Thorac Res Pract. 2023 Jul;24(4):194-201. doi: 10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.22198.

DOI:10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.22198
PMID:37485708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10544296/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ) enables the assessment and identification of symptoms related to respiratory dysfunction and hyperventilation syndrome. The aim was to investigate the validity of the Turkish version of the NQ in asthmatics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-four individuals with asthma were included. Spirometry was performed. Dyspnea was assessed using the modified Borg and modified Medical Research Council scales. Breath-holding time was recorded. End-tidal carbon dioxide was measured using a portable capnograph. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded. Asthma Control Test was used to evaluate the asthma control level. Quality of life was assessed using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and Nottingham Health Profile. Beck Depression Inventory was used to determine depression.

RESULTS

Bartlett's test of sphericity (360.749, df 105, P < .001) and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin criterion (0.752) for 15-item NQ supported a single-factor model with 36.38% of explained variability through principal component analysis and explanatory factor analysis. For 15-item NQ with this single-factor model, Cronbach's alpha was 0.872, and the test-retest reliability was 0.628. There was a significant negative correlation between NQ and Asthma Control Test (r = -0.448), and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (r = -0.743) and a significant positive association with Beck Depression Inventory (r = 0.477), Nottingham Health Profile-energy (r = 0.370), Nottingham Health Profile-pain (r = 0.313), Nottingham Health Profile-sleep (r = 0.294), and Nottingham Health Profile-physical activity scores (r = 0.406) (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 15-item Turkish version of the NQ is valid and reliable in asthmatics. Individuals with uncontrolled asthma have higher NQ scores than those with well-controlled asthma. NQ is associated with asthma control level, asthma-related quality of life, health profile, and depression.

摘要

目的

奈梅亨问卷(NQ)可用于评估和识别与呼吸功能障碍及过度通气综合征相关的症状。本研究旨在探讨NQ土耳其语版本在哮喘患者中的有效性。

材料与方法

纳入54例哮喘患者。进行肺功能测定。使用改良的博格量表和改良的医学研究委员会量表评估呼吸困难程度。记录屏气时间。使用便携式二氧化碳监测仪测量呼气末二氧化碳。记录血氧饱和度和心率。使用哮喘控制测试评估哮喘控制水平。使用哮喘生活质量问卷和诺丁汉健康量表评估生活质量。使用贝克抑郁量表确定抑郁情况。

结果

针对15项NQ的巴特利特球形检验(360.749,自由度105,P <.001)和凯泽-迈耶-奥尔金标准(0.752)通过主成分分析和解释性因子分析支持单因素模型,解释变异率为36.38%。对于具有此单因素模型的15项NQ,克朗巴赫α系数为0.872,重测信度为0.628。NQ与哮喘控制测试(r = -0.448)、哮喘生活质量问卷(r = -0.743)之间存在显著负相关,与贝克抑郁量表(r = 0.477)、诺丁汉健康量表-精力(r = 0.370)、诺丁汉健康量表-疼痛(r = 0.313)、诺丁汉健康量表-睡眠(r = 0.294)以及诺丁汉健康量表-身体活动得分(r = 0.406)之间存在显著正相关(P <.05)。

结论

15项NQ土耳其语版本在哮喘患者中有效且可靠。哮喘控制不佳的患者NQ得分高于控制良好的患者。NQ与哮喘控制水平、哮喘相关生活质量健康量表及抑郁相关。

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in Asthma.《奈梅亨问卷土耳其语版本在哮喘中的效度与信度》
Thorac Res Pract. 2023 Jul;24(4):194-201. doi: 10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.22198.
2
Hyperventilation in asthma: a validation study of the Nijmegen Questionnaire--NQ.哮喘中的过度通气:奈梅亨问卷(NQ)的验证研究
J Asthma. 2014 Oct;51(8):839-46. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.922190. Epub 2014 May 29.
3
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Adaptation of VITACORA-19 in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.VITACORA - 19土耳其语改编版在银屑病关节炎患者中的信度和效度
Arch Rheumatol. 2016 Jul 27;31(4):321-328. doi: 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2016.5741. eCollection 2016 Dec.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Iranian Version of Nijmegen Questionnaire in Iranians with Asthma.伊朗版奈梅亨问卷在伊朗哮喘患者中的信度和效度
Tanaffos. 2015;14(2):121-7.
5
The Thai version of the Nijmegen questionnaire.奈梅亨问卷的泰语版本。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 13;8(12):e12296. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12296. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Validity, reliability, and Rasch analysis of the orthotics and prosthetics users' survey: Turkish version of the lower-extremity functional status.矫形器和假肢使用者调查的有效性、可靠性和 Rasch 分析:下肢功能状况的土耳其语版本。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023 Jun 1;47(3):307-312. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000198. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
7
Turkish Validity-Reliability Study of the Celiac Disease-Specific Pediatric Quality of Life Scale.中文版特发性门脉高压症患者生活质量量表的信度和效度研究。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar;33(3):248-256. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2022.21242.
8
Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the scales of perceived stigma for children with epilepsy and their parents.癫痫患儿及其父母感知耻辱量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Jul 11;5(3):238-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.07.004. eCollection 2018 Jul 10.
9
Validity study of the Japanese version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire for verifying dysfunctional breathing in Japanese asthma patients.验证日本哮喘患者呼吸功能障碍的《奈梅亨问卷》日文版的效度研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 Apr 3;3(3):100247. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100247. eCollection 2024 Aug.
10
Cultural adaptation and Turkish version of Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities in individuals with spinal cord injury: a reliability and validity study.脊髓损伤个体中身体残疾者身体活动量表的文化适应及土耳其语版本:一项信效度研究
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Oct;44(21):6414-6423. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1964624. Epub 2021 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Turkish Version of the Self Evaluation of Breathing Questionnaire: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Validity and Reliability.《呼吸问卷自我评估的土耳其语版本:跨文化调适、效度与信度》
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s10484-025-09726-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement.肺功能测定标准化 2019 修订版。美国胸科学会和欧洲呼吸学会官方技术声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 15;200(8):e70-e88. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST.
2
Association of dysfunctional breathing with health-related quality of life: A cross-sectional study in a young population.呼吸功能障碍与健康相关生活质量的关系:一项在年轻人群中的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205634. eCollection 2018.
3
Methods for Estimating Item-Score Reliability.估计项目得分信度的方法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;42(7):553-570. doi: 10.1177/0146621618758290. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
4
Asthma.哮喘。
Lancet. 2018 Feb 24;391(10122):783-800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33311-1. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
5
The Nijmegen Questionnaire and dysfunctional breathing.奈梅亨问卷与功能性呼吸障碍
ERJ Open Res. 2015 May 15;1(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00001-2015. eCollection 2015 May.
6
Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification.功能失调性呼吸:文献综述与分类建议
Eur Respir Rev. 2016 Sep;25(141):287-94. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0088-2015.
7
Reliability and Validity of the Iranian Version of Nijmegen Questionnaire in Iranians with Asthma.伊朗版奈梅亨问卷在伊朗哮喘患者中的信度和效度
Tanaffos. 2015;14(2):121-7.
8
The Scree Test and the Number of Factors: a Dynamic Graphics Approach.碎石检验与因子数量:一种动态图形方法
Span J Psychol. 2015 Mar 17;18:E11. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.13.
9
Hyperventilation in asthma: a validation study of the Nijmegen Questionnaire--NQ.哮喘中的过度通气:奈梅亨问卷(NQ)的验证研究
J Asthma. 2014 Oct;51(8):839-46. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.922190. Epub 2014 May 29.
10
The validation of the Turkish version of Asthma Control Test.哮喘控制测试土耳其语版本的验证。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Sep;22(7):1773-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0309-1. Epub 2012 Nov 10.