Brain and Spine Institute Research Center, 47 Bd de l'Hopital, Paris, 75013, France.
Experimental Therapeutics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, V5Z 1L3, BC, Canada; Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2146 East Mall, Vancouver V6T 1Z3, BC, Canada.
J Control Release. 2015 Dec 28;220(Pt A):348-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.10.053. Epub 2015 Nov 1.
Our laboratory reported that Irinophore C™ (IrC™; a lipid-based nanoparticulate formulation of irinotecan) is effective against an orthotopic model of glioblastoma (GBM) and that treatment with IrC™ was associated with vascular normalization within the tumor. Here, the therapeutic effects of IrC™ when used in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in concurrent and sequential treatment schedules were tested. It was anticipated that IrC™ engendered vascular normalization would increase the delivery of TMZ to the tumor and that this would be reflected by improved treatment outcomes. The approach compared equally efficacious doses of irinotecan (IRN; 50 mg/kg) and IrC™ (25 mg/kg) in order to determine if there was a unique advantage achieved when combining TMZ with IrC™. The TMZ sensitive U251MG(O) cell line (null expression of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)) modified to express the fluorescent protein mKate2 was inoculated orthotopically into NOD.CB17-SCID mice and treatment was initiated 14 days later. Our results demonstrated that IrC™ and TMZ administered concurrently resulted in optimal treatment outcomes, with 50% long term survivors (>180 days) in comparison to 17% long term survivors in animals treated with IRN and TMZ or TMZ alone. Indeed, the different treatments resulted in a 353%, 222% and 280% increase in median survival time (MST) compared to untreated animals for, respectively, IrC™ combined with TMZ, IRN combined with TMZ, and TMZ alone. When TMZ was administered after completion of IRN or IrC™ dosing, an increase in median survival time of 167-174% was observed compared to untreated animals and of 67% and 74%, respectively, when IRN (50 mg/kg) and IrC™ (25mg/kg) were given as single agents. We confirmed in these studies that after completion of the Q7D×3 dosing of IrC™, but not IRN, the tumor-associated vascular was normalized as compared to untreated tumors. Specifically, reductions in the fraction of collagen IV-free CD31 staining (p<0.05) and reductions in tumor vessel diameter were observed in tumors from IrC™-treated animals when compared to tumors from untreated or IRN treated animals. Analysis by transmission electron microscopy of the ultra-structure of tumors from IrC™-treated and untreated animals revealed that tumor-associated vessels from treated animals were smaller, more organized and exhibited a morphology comparable to normal blood vessels. In conclusion, optimal treatment outcomes were achieved when IrC™ and TMZ were administered concurrently, whereas IrC™ followed by TMZ treatment given sequentially did not confer any therapeutic advantage.
我们的实验室曾报道,伊立替康脂质纳米粒(Irinophore C,IrC;伊立替康的一种脂基纳米粒制剂)对神经胶质瘤(GBM)的原位模型具有疗效,并且 IrC 的治疗与肿瘤内的血管正常化有关。在此,我们测试了 IrC 与替莫唑胺(TMZ)联合用于同期和序贯治疗方案的治疗效果。我们预计 IrC 引起的血管正常化将增加 TMZ 向肿瘤的输送,并且这将反映在改善的治疗结果中。该方法比较了等效剂量的伊立替康(IRN;50mg/kg)和 IrC(25mg/kg),以确定当将 TMZ 与 IrC 联合使用时是否具有独特的优势。将修饰表达荧光蛋白 mKate2 的 U251MG(O)细胞系(O-6-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA 甲基转移酶(MGMT)表达缺失)原位接种到 NOD.CB17-SCID 小鼠中,并在 14 天后开始治疗。我们的结果表明,IrC 和 TMZ 同时给药可获得最佳的治疗效果,与用 IRN 和 TMZ 或 TMZ 单独治疗的动物相比,50%的长期幸存者(>180 天)。实际上,与未治疗动物相比,不同的治疗方法分别使中位生存时间(MST)增加了 353%、222%和 280%,用于 IrC 联合 TMZ、IRN 联合 TMZ 和 TMZ 单独治疗。当 TMZ 在完成 IRN 或 IrC 给药后给予时,与未治疗动物相比,中位生存时间延长了 167-174%,而分别用 IRN(50mg/kg)和 IrC(25mg/kg)作为单一药物治疗时,中位生存时间延长了 67%和 74%。在这些研究中,我们证实 IrC 的 Q7D×3 剂量完成后,肿瘤相关血管正常化,而不是 IRN。具体而言,与未治疗的肿瘤相比,用 IrC 治疗的动物的肿瘤中 CD31 染色的无胶原蛋白 IV 部分的分数减少(p<0.05),并且肿瘤血管直径减少。用透射电子显微镜分析 IrC 治疗和未治疗动物的肿瘤的超微结构显示,治疗动物的肿瘤相关血管较小,更有组织,并且表现出与正常血管相似的形态。总之,当 IrC 和 TMZ 同时给药时,可获得最佳的治疗效果,而 IrC 序贯 TMZ 治疗则没有带来任何治疗优势。