• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Choosing Healthcare Options by Involving Canada's Elderly: a protocol for the CHOICE realist synthesis project on engaging older persons in healthcare decision-making.通过让加拿大老年人参与来选择医疗保健方案:一项关于让老年人参与医疗保健决策的CHOICE现实主义综合项目的方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 3;5(11):e008190. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008190.
2
Engaging older adults in healthcare research and planning: a realist synthesis.让老年人参与医疗保健研究与规划:一项实在论综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 7;2:10. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0022-2. eCollection 2016.
3
Quality of patient, family, caregiver and public engagement in decision-making in healthcare systems: a scoping review protocol.患者、家属、照护者和公众在医疗保健系统中的决策参与质量:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 6;9(11):e032788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032788.
4
Tailoring and evaluating an intervention to improve shared decision-making among seniors with dementia, their caregivers, and healthcare providers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.定制和评估一项干预措施以改善老年痴呆症患者、其护理人员和医疗服务提供者之间的共同决策:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jun 25;19(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2697-1.
5
Engaging Older Adults in Health Care Decision-Making: A Realist Synthesis.让老年人参与医疗保健决策:一项实在论综合分析
Patient. 2016 Oct;9(5):383-93. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0168-x.
6
Giving voice to older adults living with frailty and their family caregivers: engagement of older adults living with frailty in research, health care decision making, and in health policy.倾听体弱老年人及其家庭照顾者的声音:让体弱老年人参与研究、医疗保健决策和卫生政策制定。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jun 17;2:23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0038-7. eCollection 2016.
7
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
8
Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.临床试验中的患者参与伙伴关系:患者伙伴和研究者决策辅助工具的开发。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):745-756. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00460-5. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol.患者、照护者和其他知识使用者参与制定共识的医疗保健举措:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 8;14(5):e080822. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080822.
10
Implementing shared decision-making in interprofessional home care teams (the IPSDM-SW study): protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.在跨专业家庭护理团队中实施共同决策(IPSDM-SW研究):一项阶梯式楔形整群随机试验的方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 24;6(11):e014023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014023.

引用本文的文献

1
Lipidomic signatures of ventilator-associated pneumonia in COVID-19 ARDS patients: a new frontier for diagnostic biomarkers.新型冠状病毒肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的脂质组学特征:诊断生物标志物的新前沿
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Jun 5;15(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01492-6.
2
Implement social prescribing successfully towards embedding: what works, for whom and in which context? A rapid realist review.成功实施社会处方以实现嵌入:哪些有效,针对谁,以及在什么情况下?快速的现实主义综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):1836. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18688-3.
3
Realist synthesis protocol on the effectiveness of a rapid response system in managing mental state deterioration in acute hospital settings.真实世界综合研究方案:快速反应系统在急性医院环境下管理精神状态恶化的效果。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 6;14(1):e077597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077597.
4
Developing an in-depth understanding of patient and caregiver engagement across care transitions from hospital: protocol for a qualitative study exploring experiences in Canada.深入了解患者和护理人员在医院过渡期间的参与情况:在加拿大探索经验的定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 21;13(7):e077436. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077436.
5
Strategies for engaging senior citizens and their informal caregivers in health policy development: a scoping review protocol.策略制定以让老年人及其非正式照护者参与卫生政策制定:范围综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 5;12(10):e064505. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064505.
6
Synthesis of the Evidence on What Works for Whom in Telemental Health: Rapid Realist Review.远程心理健康中对谁有效证据的综合:快速实在论综述。
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Sep 29;11(2):e38239. doi: 10.2196/38239.
7
Transforming primary care for older Canadians living with frailty: mixed methods study protocol for a complex primary care intervention.为衰弱的加拿大老年人提供初级保健服务的转型:一项复杂的初级保健干预措施的混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 13;11(5):e042911. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042911.
8
Key Lessons Learned in the Strategic Implementation of the Primary Care Collaborative Memory Clinic Model: A Tale of Two Regions.基层医疗协作记忆诊所模式战略实施中的关键经验教训:两个地区的故事
Healthc Policy. 2019 Aug;15(1):53-69. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2019.25938.
9
Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review.实现成功的社区参与:一项快速现实主义综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1.
10
Giving voice to older adults living with frailty and their family caregivers: engagement of older adults living with frailty in research, health care decision making, and in health policy.倾听体弱老年人及其家庭照顾者的声音:让体弱老年人参与研究、医疗保健决策和卫生政策制定。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jun 17;2:23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0038-7. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.患者和公众参与对服务使用者、研究人员和社区影响的系统评价。
Patient. 2014;7(4):387-95. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0.
2
Information sharing with rural family caregivers during care transitions of hip fracture patients.髋部骨折患者护理过渡期间与农村家庭照料者的信息共享。
Int J Integr Care. 2014 Jun 16;14:e018. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1195. eCollection 2014 Apr.
3
Do interventions designed to support shared decision-making reduce health inequalities? A systematic review and meta-analysis.旨在支持共同决策的干预措施能否减少健康不平等?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e94670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094670. eCollection 2014.
4
The effect of targeted and tailored patient depression engagement interventions on patient-physician discussion of suicidal thoughts: a randomized control trial.针对性和个性化的患者抑郁干预措施对医患之间自杀念头讨论的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29(8):1148-54. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2843-8. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
5
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.患者参与研究:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
6
"Just another fish in the pond": the transitional care experience of a hip fracture patient.“池塘里的又一条鱼”:髋部骨折患者的过渡性护理体验。
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Jun 26;13:e023. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1103. Print 2013 Apr.
7
What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review.最适合进行综述的知识综合方法是什么? 系统评价方案。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Aug 3;12:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-114.
8
The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review.患者和公众参与对英国国民保健制度医疗保健的影响:系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Feb;24(1):28-38. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr066. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
9
Protocol--realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES).方案——现实主义和元叙述证据综合:不断发展的标准(RAMESES)。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Aug 16;11:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-115.
10
Understanding the relationship between the perceived characteristics of clinical practice guidelines and their uptake: protocol for a realist review.理解临床实践指南的感知特征与其采用之间的关系:一项真实主义综述的方案。
Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 6;6:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-69.

通过让加拿大老年人参与来选择医疗保健方案:一项关于让老年人参与医疗保健决策的CHOICE现实主义综合项目的方案

Choosing Healthcare Options by Involving Canada's Elderly: a protocol for the CHOICE realist synthesis project on engaging older persons in healthcare decision-making.

作者信息

Stolee Paul, Elliott Jacobi, McNeil Heather, Boscart Veronique, Heckman George A, Hutchinson Rebecca, Hedley Margaret, Glouberman Sholom, Judd Maria

机构信息

School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada.

School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 3;5(11):e008190. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008190.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008190
PMID:26534730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4636611/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

While patient and citizen engagement has been recognised as a crucial element in healthcare reform, limited attention has been paid to how best to engage seniors-the fastest growing segment of the population and the largest users of the healthcare system. To improve the healthcare services for this population, seniors and their families need to be engaged as active partners in healthcare decision-making, research and planning. This synthesis aims to understand the underlying context and mechanisms needed to achieve meaningful engagement of older adults in healthcare decision-making, research and planning.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The CHOICE Knowledge Synthesis Project: Choosing Healthcare Options by Involving Canada's Elderly aims to address this issue by synthesising current knowledge on patient, family, and caregiver engagement. A realist synthesis will support us to learn from other patient and citizen engagement initiatives, from previous research, and from seniors, families and caregivers themselves. The synthesis will guide development or adaptation of a framework, leading to the development of best practice guidelines and recommendations for engagement of older people and their families and caregivers in clinical decision-making, healthcare delivery, planning and research.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The components of this protocol involving consultation with patients or caregivers have received ethics clearance from the University of Waterloo, Office of Research Ethics (ORE#19094). After completion of the project, we will amalgamate the information collected into a knowledge synthesis report which will include best practice guidelines and recommendations for patient, family and caregiver engagement in clinical and health system planning and research contexts.

RESULTS

Will be further disseminated to citizens, clinicians, researchers and policymakers with the help of our partners.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42015024749.

摘要

引言

虽然患者和公民参与已被视为医疗改革的关键要素,但对于如何最好地让老年人参与其中却关注有限,老年人是人口中增长最快的群体,也是医疗系统的最大用户。为改善针对这一群体的医疗服务,老年人及其家庭需要作为积极伙伴参与医疗决策、研究和规划。本综述旨在了解实现老年人有意义地参与医疗决策、研究和规划所需的潜在背景和机制。

方法与分析

“选择医疗保健选项知识综合项目:通过让加拿大老年人参与来选择医疗保健选项”旨在通过综合有关患者、家庭和护理人员参与的现有知识来解决这一问题。实证综合将支持我们从其他患者和公民参与倡议、先前的研究以及老年人、家庭和护理人员自身中学习。该综合将指导框架的开发或调整,从而制定最佳实践指南以及关于老年人及其家庭和护理人员参与临床决策、医疗服务提供、规划和研究的建议。

伦理与传播

本方案中涉及与患者或护理人员协商的部分已获得滑铁卢大学研究伦理办公室的伦理批准(ORE#19094)。项目完成后,我们将把收集到的信息整合为一份知识综合报告,其中将包括关于患者、家庭和护理人员参与临床及卫生系统规划和研究的最佳实践指南和建议。

结果

将在我们合作伙伴的帮助下进一步传播给公民、临床医生、研究人员和政策制定者。

试验注册号

CRD42015024749。