Suppr超能文献

“欺诈行为”:狮子对齐,下颌摆动!

'Skullduggery': Lions Align and Their Mandibles Rock!

作者信息

Williams Vivienne L, Loveridge Andrew J, Newton David J, Macdonald David W

机构信息

School of Animal, Plant & Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 4;10(11):e0135144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135144. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

South Africa has legally exported substantial quantities of lion bones to Southeast Asia and China since 2008, apparently as part of the multinational trade substituting bones and body parts of other large cats for those of the tiger in wine and other health tonics. The legal sale of lion bones may mask an illegal trade, the size of which is only partially known. An observed component of the illegal trade is that quantities of skeletons are sometimes declared falsely/fraudulently on CITES export permits. Furthermore, there are emerging concerns that bones from tigers reared in captivity in South Africa and elsewhere are being laundered as lion bones using CITES Appendix II permits. There is therefore a need for tools to monitor the trade in lion body parts and to distinguish between lions and tigers. Our research indicates that it is possible to use skeletons, skulls and cranial sutures to detect misdeclarations in the lion bone trade. It is also possible to use the average mass of a lion skeleton to corroborate the numbers of skeletons declared on CITES permits, relative to the weight of the consolidated consignments stated on the air waybills. When the mass of consolidated consignments of skeletons destined for export was regressed against the number of skeletons in that consignment, there was a strong correlation between the variables (r2 = 0.992) that can be used as a predictor of the accuracy of a declaration on a CITES permit. Additionally, the skulls of lions and tigers differ: two cranial sutures of lions align and their mandibles rock when placed on a flat surface, whereas the cranial sutures of tigers are not aligned and their mandibles rest naturally on two contact points. These two morphological differences between the skulls of tigers and lions are easy to observe at a glance and provide a method for distinguishing between the species if illegal trade in the bones is suspected and the skulls are present. These identifications should ideally be confirmed by a DNA test to provide rigorous evidence to prosecute offenders violating CITES regulations.

摘要

自2008年以来,南非已合法地向东南亚和中国出口了大量狮子骨骼,显然这是跨国贸易的一部分,即用其他大型猫科动物的骨骼和身体部位替代老虎的骨骼和身体部位用于酿酒及其他滋补品。狮子骨骼的合法销售可能掩盖了非法贸易,而非法贸易的规模目前仅部分为人所知。非法贸易中一个已观察到的情况是,有时在《濒危野生动植物种国际贸易公约》(CITES)出口许可证上会虚假/欺诈性申报骨骼数量。此外,人们越来越担心,南非及其他地方人工养殖的老虎的骨骼正利用CITES附录II许可证被当作狮子骨骼洗白。因此,需要有工具来监测狮子身体部位的贸易,并区分狮子和老虎。我们的研究表明,利用骨骼、头骨和颅缝可以检测出狮子骨骼贸易中的虚假申报。还可以利用狮子骨骼的平均质量来核实CITES许可证上申报的骨骼数量与空运提单上申报的整批货物重量是否相符。当将出口的整批骨骼货物的重量与该批货物中的骨骼数量进行回归分析时,变量之间存在很强的相关性(r2 = 0.992),这可用于预测CITES许可证申报的准确性。此外,狮子和老虎的头骨有所不同:狮子的两条颅缝对齐,其下颌骨放在平面上时会晃动,而老虎的颅缝不对齐,其下颌骨自然地靠在两个接触点上。老虎和狮子头骨的这两个形态差异很容易一眼看出,如果怀疑存在骨骼非法贸易且有头骨存在,这提供了一种区分这两个物种的方法。理想情况下,这些鉴别应通过DNA检测来确认,以便提供确凿证据起诉违反CITES规定的违法者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da16/4633142/119c329e31bf/pone.0135144.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验