• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Health on the Net seal label and DISCERN as content quality indicators for patients seeking information about thumb sucking habit.评估网络健康认证标签和DISCERN作为寻求有关吮拇指习惯信息的患者的内容质量指标。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S481-5. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163509.
2
Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid?正颌外科：互联网上的患者信息是否有效？
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Aug;34(4):466-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr046. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
3
Content and quality of website information on the treatment of oral ulcers.关于口腔溃疡治疗的网站信息内容与质量。
Br Dent J. 2014 Oct;217(7):E15. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.886.
4
Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.袖状胃切除术互联网信息质量评估
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
5
Online Information on the Treatment of Burning Mouth Syndrome: Quality and Readability.在线治疗灼口综合征信息：质量和可读性。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017;31(2):147-151. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1717.
6
What's Nissen on the net? the quality of information regarding Nissen fundoplication on the internet.网上的尼森是什么？互联网上有关尼森胃底折叠术的信息质量。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5198-5206. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08895-z. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
7
Head and neck cancer information on the internet: type, accuracy and content.互联网上的头颈部癌症信息：类型、准确性和内容。
Oral Oncol. 2009 Aug;45(8):675-7. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
8
Surfing Behind a Boat: Quality and Reliability of Online Resources on Scaphoid Fractures.船后冲浪：舟骨骨折在线资源的质量与可靠性
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2016 Oct;21(3):374-81. doi: 10.1142/S2424835516500375.
9
Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information.成人正畸：互联网信息的质量评估
J Orthod. 2016 Sep;43(3):186-92. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2016.1194599. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
10
Empowerment of Parents of Children With Craniosynostosis by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites.通过对患者信息网站进行客观评分增强颅缝早闭患儿家长的能力。
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Jun;27(4):874-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002623.

引用本文的文献

1
An infodemiology study on exploring the quality and reliability of colorectal cancer immunotherapy information.一项关于探索结直肠癌免疫治疗信息质量和可靠性的信息流行病学研究。
Digit Health. 2023 Oct 4;9:20552076231205286. doi: 10.1177/20552076231205286. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Quality and reliability of web-based information regarding restorative treatment in pediatric patients.关于儿科患者修复治疗的网络信息的质量和可靠性。
Eur Oral Res. 2021 Sep 1;55(3):104-109. doi: 10.26650/eor.2021812053.
3
How Social Media Comments Inform the Promotion of Mask-Wearing and Other COVID-19 Prevention Strategies.社交媒体评论如何为推广戴口罩和其他 COVID-19 预防策略提供信息。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 25;18(11):5624. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115624.
4
Assessment of quality and readability of internet-based health information related to commonly prescribed angiotensin receptor blockers.评估与常用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂相关的基于互联网的健康信息的质量和可读性。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Mar 11;35:70. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.35.70.18237. eCollection 2020.
5
Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study.互联网上关于 COVID-19 的错误信息：信息流行病学研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 9;6(2):e18444. doi: 10.2196/18444.
6
The Accuracy of Information about Orthodontics Available on the Internet.互联网上正畸学信息的准确性。
Turk J Orthod. 2018 Dec;31(4):127-132. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.18007. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
7
A systematic review of online resources to support patient decision-making for full-thickness rectal prolapse surgery.全层直肠前突手术患者决策支持的在线资源系统评价。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Nov;21(11):853-862. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1708-7. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
8
Assessing internet-based information used to aid patient decision-making about surgery for perianal Crohn's fistula.评估用于辅助肛周克罗恩病瘘管手术决策的基于互联网的信息。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Jun;21(6):461-469. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1648-2. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
The quality of internet sites providing information relating to oral cancer.互联网口腔癌相关信息网站的质量。
Oral Oncol. 2009 Sep;45(9):e95-8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.017. Epub 2009 May 19.
2
Brief DISCERN, six questions for the evaluation of evidence-based content of health-related websites.简要 DISCERN，用于评估健康相关网站循证内容的六个问题。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Oct;77(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.016. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
3
Improving on-line information for potential living kidney donors.改善潜在活体肾供体的在线信息。
Kidney Int. 2007 May;71(10):1062-70. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002168. Epub 2007 Mar 14.
4
Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology.儿科神经肿瘤学领域互联网上健康信息的质量。
Neuro Oncol. 2006 Apr;8(2):175-82. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2005-008. Epub 2006 Mar 2.
5
Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship.患者通过互联网获取健康信息：这如何影响医患关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
6
How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study.互联网如何影响癌症患者的体验：一项定性研究。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):564. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.564.
7
Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet.评估三种用于评估互联网上健康信息质量的工具的可靠性和有效性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jun;50(2):151-5. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00124-6.
8
Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet.互联网上健康信息使用相关伤害案例分析。
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2869-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2869.
9
Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.评估万维网上面向消费者的健康信息质量的实证研究：一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2002;287(20):2691-700. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691.
10
How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews.消费者如何在万维网上搜索和评估健康信息？采用焦点小组、可用性测试和深度访谈的定性研究。
BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):573-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573.

评估网络健康认证标签和DISCERN作为寻求有关吮拇指习惯信息的患者的内容质量指标。

Evaluation of Health on the Net seal label and DISCERN as content quality indicators for patients seeking information about thumb sucking habit.

作者信息

Shital Kiran D P, Bargale Seema, Pandya Parth, Bhatt Kuntal, Barad Nirav, Shah Nilay, Venkataraghavan Karthik, Ramesh K

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Uvarsad, Gandinagar, Gujarat, India.

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, K. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, At and Po Pipariya, Ta. Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S481-5. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163509.

DOI:10.4103/0975-7406.163509
PMID:26538902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4606644/
Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of websites on the thumb sucking habit using DISCERN instrument and Health on the Net (HON) seal code at a single moment in time.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

An Internet search engine (www.google.com) was used to identify websites comprising information on "thumb sucking habit." Of over 204,000 links for thumb sucking habit, the first 100 were analyzed in detail. After excluding discussion groups, news and video feeds, and removing carbon copy sites, only 36 relevant websites remained, which were then assessed using the DISCERN instrument and HON seal code. Using the 16 questions of DISCERN for assessing the reliability and quality of the consumer information which were scored from 1 to 5, an appropriate index of the quality of the information was generated. All the assessed websites were also checked for presence or absence of HON seal code.

RESULTS

The maximum score attainable for an outstanding website is 80. Of the 36 websites that were scored the highest score obtained by one of the websites according to the DISCERN tool was 55 of 80, and the lowest score achieved was 16 of 80. The websites achieving the maximum and minimum score were children.webmd.com and thebehaviorsolution.com, respectively. The HON seal was displayed only in three websites, which were medicinenet.com, righthealth.com, and children.webmd.com.

CONCLUSIONS

By directing patients to validated websites on the thumb sucking habit, clinicians can ensure patients find appropriate information.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用DISCERN工具和健康网（HON）认证码在某一时刻评估有关吮拇指习惯的网站的可靠性。

对象与方法

使用互联网搜索引擎（www.google.com）来识别包含“吮拇指习惯”信息的网站。在超过204,000个关于吮拇指习惯的链接中，对前100个进行了详细分析。在排除讨论组、新闻和视频源，并去除重复网站后，仅剩下36个相关网站，然后使用DISCERN工具和HON认证码对其进行评估。使用DISCERN的16个问题来评估消费者信息的可靠性和质量，这些问题的评分从1到5，由此生成了一个合适的信息质量指标。所有评估的网站还检查了是否有HON认证码。

结果

一个优秀网站的最高得分可达80分。在这36个网站中，根据DISCERN工具，其中一个网站获得的最高分是80分中的55分，最低分是80分中的16分。得分最高和最低的网站分别是children.webmd.com和thebehaviorsolution.com。只有三个网站显示了HON认证码，分别是medicinenet.com、righthealth.com和children.webmd.com。

结论

通过引导患者访问有关吮拇指习惯的经过验证的网站，临床医生可以确保患者找到合适的信息。