Qin Keyu, Li Jing, Yang Xiaonan
Tourism and Environment College, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, Shaanxi, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Nov 3;12(11):14094-113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114094.
Natural ecosystems provide society with important goods and services. With rapidly increasing populations and excessive utilization of natural resources, humans have been enhancing the production of some services at the expense of others. Although the need for certain trade-offs between conservation and development is urgent, having only a small number of efficient methods to assess such trade-offs has impeded progress. This study focuses on the evaluation of ecosystem services under different land use schemes. It reveals the spatial and temporal distributions of and changes in ecosystem services. Based on a correlation rate model and distribution mapping, the trade-offs and synergies of these ecosystem services can be found. Here, we also describe a new simple approach to quantify the relationships of every trade-off and synergy. The results show that all ecosystem services possess trade-offs and synergies in the study area. The trend of improving carbon sequestration and water interception indicate that these key ecosystem services have the strongest synergy. And the decrease in regional agricultural production and other services, except water yield, may be considered as trade-offs. The synergy between water yield and agricultural production was the most significant, while the trade-off between water interception and carbon sequestration was the most apparent, according to our interaction quantification model. The results of this study have implications for planning and monitoring the future management of natural capital and ecosystem services, and can be integrated into land use decision-making.
自然生态系统为社会提供重要的产品和服务。随着人口迅速增长以及自然资源的过度利用,人类一直在以牺牲其他服务为代价来提高某些服务的产量。尽管在保护与发展之间进行某些权衡的需求迫在眉睫,但评估此类权衡的有效方法数量有限,这阻碍了相关进展。本研究聚焦于不同土地利用方案下的生态系统服务评估。它揭示了生态系统服务的时空分布及变化。基于相关率模型和分布图,可以发现这些生态系统服务之间的权衡与协同关系。在此,我们还描述了一种新的简单方法来量化每种权衡与协同关系。结果表明,研究区域内所有生态系统服务都存在权衡与协同关系。碳固存和水分截留改善的趋势表明,这些关键生态系统服务具有最强的协同作用。除产水量外,区域农业生产和其他服务的减少可视为权衡。根据我们的相互作用量化模型,产水量与农业生产之间的协同作用最为显著,而水分截留与碳固存之间的权衡最为明显。本研究结果对规划和监测自然资本与生态系统服务的未来管理具有启示意义,并可纳入土地利用决策中。