Betancourt Theresa S, Zuilkowski Stephanie S, Ravichandran Arathi, Einhorn Honora, Arora Nikita, Bhattacharya Chakravarty Aruna, Brennan Robert T
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States of America.
Learning Systems Institute and Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, Florida State University, University Center C4600, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 5;10(11):e0141222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141222. eCollection 2015.
The child protection community is increasingly focused on developing tools to assess threats to child protection and the basic security needs and rights of children and families living in adverse circumstances. Although tremendous advances have been made to improve measurement of individual child health status or household functioning for use in low-resource settings, little attention has been paid to a more diverse array of settings in which many children in adversity spend time and how context contributes to threats to child protection. The SAFE model posits that insecurity in any of the following fundamental domains threatens security in the others: Safety/freedom from harm; Access to basic physiological needs and healthcare; Family and connection to others; Education and economic security. Site-level tools are needed in order to monitor the conditions that can dramatically undermine or support healthy child growth, development and emotional and behavioral health. From refugee camps and orphanages to schools and housing complexes, site-level threats exist that are not well captured by commonly used measures of child health and well-being or assessments of single households (e.g., SDQ, HOME).
The present study presents a methodology and the development of a scale for assessing site-level child protection threats in various settings of adversity. A modified Delphi panel process was enhanced with two stages of expert review in core content areas as well as review by experts in instrument development, and field pilot testing.
Field testing in two diverse sites in India-a construction site and a railway station-revealed that the resulting SAFE instrument was sensitive to the differences between the sites from the standpoint of core child protection issues.
儿童保护领域越来越关注开发工具,以评估对儿童保护的威胁以及生活在不利环境中的儿童及其家庭的基本安全需求和权利。尽管在改善用于低资源环境的儿童个体健康状况或家庭功能测量方面取得了巨大进展,但对于许多处于逆境中的儿童所处的更多样化环境,以及环境如何导致对儿童保护的威胁,却很少受到关注。安全(SAFE)模型假定,以下任何一个基本领域的不安全都会威胁到其他领域的安全:安全/免受伤害;获得基本生理需求和医疗保健;家庭及与他人的联系;教育和经济安全。需要有场所层面的工具来监测那些可能严重破坏或支持儿童健康成长、发展以及情感和行为健康的状况。从难民营、孤儿院到学校和住宅小区,存在一些场所层面的威胁,而常用的儿童健康和福祉测量方法或单个家庭评估(如优势与困难问卷、家庭观察环境量表)并未充分涵盖这些威胁。
本研究介绍了一种方法,并开发了一个量表,用于评估各种逆境环境中场所层面的儿童保护威胁。通过在核心内容领域进行两个阶段的专家评审、仪器开发专家的评审以及现场预测试,对改良的德尔菲专家小组流程进行了强化。
在印度的两个不同场所——一个建筑工地和一个火车站——进行的现场测试表明,由此产生的安全(SAFE)工具从核心儿童保护问题的角度对不同场所之间的差异很敏感。