Armstrong Nicola C, Gay Louise A
a Human Systems Group, Dstl , Salisbury , UK.
Ergonomics. 2016 May;59(5):692-6. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1084052. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
The additional mass and fit of current military in-service body armour (ISBA) can reduce pulmonary function in a way that is characteristic of a restrictive respiratory impairment. This could ultimately impair exercise capacity and military performance. This study compared pulmonary function (forced vital capacity [FVC] and forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]) in UK ISBA (15.3 kg) and three flexible body armours (BAs) (FA1: 10 kg; FA2: 7.8 kg; FA3: 10 kg) in eight male soldiers. The design of the ballistic plates differed between the BAs to improve the flexibility. FVC and FEV1 were reduced by 4-6%, without reduction in FEV1/FVC for ISBA, FA2 and FA3, when compared to NoBA (p < 0.05). No difference was observed between FA1 and NoBA. As expected, wearing BA caused a mild restrictive ventilatory impairment; however, modifications to BA design can reduce the degree of this impairment. Practitioner Summary: This study showed that wearing body armour caused a mild restrictive ventilatory impairment. However, the design of the armour can be modified to reduce the degree of this impairment. This may lead to improvements in soldier performance during tasks that require body armour.
当前军队现役防弹衣(ISBA)额外的重量和贴合度会以限制性呼吸障碍的特征方式降低肺功能。这最终可能损害运动能力和军事表现。本研究比较了8名男性士兵穿着英国ISBA(15.3千克)和三种柔性防弹衣(BA)(FA1:10千克;FA2:7.8千克;FA3:10千克)时的肺功能(用力肺活量[FVC]和1秒用力呼气量[FEV1])。不同BA的防弹板设计有所不同以提高灵活性。与不穿防弹衣(NoBA)相比,ISBA、FA2和FA3的FVC和FEV1降低了4 - 6%,但FEV1/FVC未降低(p < 0.05)。未观察到FA1与NoBA之间存在差异。正如预期的那样,穿着BA会导致轻度限制性通气障碍;然而,对BA设计进行改进可以降低这种障碍的程度。从业者总结:本研究表明穿着防弹衣会导致轻度限制性通气障碍。然而,可以对防弹衣的设计进行改进以降低这种障碍的程度。这可能会改善士兵在需要穿着防弹衣的任务中的表现。