Hessels A J, Larson E L
School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
J Hosp Infect. 2016 Apr;92(4):349-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.08.023. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
Standard precaution (SP) adherence is universally suboptimal, despite being a core component of healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) prevention and healthcare worker (HCW) safety. Emerging evidence suggests that patient safety climate (PSC) factors may improve HCW behaviours. Our aim was to examine the relationship between PSC and SP adherence by HCWs in acute care hospitals. A systematic review was conducted as guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Three electronic databases were comprehensively searched for literature published or available in English between 2000 and 2014. Seven of 888 articles identified were eligible for final inclusion in the review. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality using a validated quality tool. The seven articles were assigned quality scores ranging from 7 to 10 of 10 possible points. Five measured all aspects of SP and two solely measured needlestick and sharps handling. Three included a secondary outcome of HCW exposure; none included HCAIs. All reported a statistically significant relationship between better PSC and greater SP adherence and used data from self-report surveys including validated PSC measures or measures of management support and leadership. Although limited in number, studies were of high quality and confirmed that PSC and SP adherence were correlated, suggesting that efforts to improve PSC may enhance adherence to a core component of HCAI prevention and HCW safety. More clearly evident is the need for additional high-quality research.
尽管标准预防措施(SP)的遵守情况普遍不尽人意,但它却是预防医疗保健相关感染(HCAI)和保障医护人员(HCW)安全的核心组成部分。新出现的证据表明,患者安全氛围(PSC)因素可能会改善医护人员的行为。我们的目的是研究急性护理医院中PSC与医护人员遵守SP之间的关系。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目的指导进行了系统评价。全面检索了三个电子数据库,以查找2000年至2014年期间以英文发表或可获取的文献。在识别出的888篇文章中,有7篇符合最终纳入该评价的条件。两名评审员使用经过验证的质量工具独立评估研究质量。这七篇文章的质量得分在满分10分中为7至10分。五篇文章测量了SP的所有方面,两篇仅测量了针刺和锐器处理。三篇文章将医护人员暴露作为次要结果;均未纳入HCAI。所有研究均报告,更好的PSC与更高的SP遵守率之间存在统计学上的显著关系,并使用了来自自我报告调查的数据,包括经过验证的PSC测量方法或管理支持和领导力的测量方法。尽管研究数量有限,但质量很高,证实了PSC与SP遵守情况相关,这表明改善PSC的努力可能会增强对HCAI预防和医护人员安全核心组成部分的遵守。更明显的是需要更多高质量的研究。