Wautischer H
Department of Philosophy, San Diego State University, California 92182-0303.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 1989 Jan-Mar;21(1):35-46. doi: 10.1080/02791072.1989.10472141.
In a state of voluntary trance or meditation, the perception of reality appears to extend beyond the usual spatial and temporal boundaries that are normally perceived by the sense organs. It is argued that the problems of validity and reliability of trance experiences for scientific discourse are in principle no different than the problems associated with ordinary perception. The shift in early Greek philosophy from myth to an emphasis on logos (reason) has led to a neglect of those subtle qualities of reason that were considered to be gateways for divine revelation. Scientific methodologies cannot account for such revelation, and there are no criteria known to science that would enable people to utilize these phenomena. Shamanic experiences are intersubjectively accessible and provide data that is suitable for the construction of rational theories if appropriate methodologies are developed. However, for a scientist, shamanic experiences are considered at most to be psychological ones, and consequently without any value for empirical research. This article examines the possibility of reevaluating the terms "rational" and "consciousness," in order to expand scientific methodologies in such a way that volitionally altered perceptions of reality can be integrated into scientific research.
在自愿进入恍惚状态或冥想状态时,对现实的感知似乎超越了感官通常所感知的正常时空界限。有人认为,恍惚体验在科学论述中的有效性和可靠性问题,原则上与普通感知相关的问题并无不同。早期希腊哲学从神话向强调逻各斯(理性)的转变,导致了对那些被视为神圣启示之门的理性微妙特质的忽视。科学方法无法解释这种启示,而且科学也没有已知的标准能让人们利用这些现象。如果开发出适当的方法,萨满教体验在主体间是可及的,并能提供适合构建理性理论的数据。然而,对于科学家来说,萨满教体验至多被视为心理体验,因此对实证研究没有任何价值。本文探讨了重新评估“理性”和“意识”这两个术语的可能性,以便以一种能将有意识改变的现实感知整合到科学研究中的方式扩展科学方法。