• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年胆道癌患者的护理模式及治疗结果

Patterns of care and treatment outcomes in older patients with biliary tract cancer.

作者信息

Horgan Anne, Knox Jennifer, Aneja Priya, Le Lisa, McKeever Elizabeth, McNamara Mairead

机构信息

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Present address: University Hospital Waterford, Department of Medical Oncology, Ardkeen, Waterford, Ireland.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2015 Dec 29;6(42):44995-5004. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5707.

DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.5707
PMID:26575326
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4792607/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although biliary tract cancers (BTC) are common in older age-groups, treatment approaches and outcomes are understudied in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 913 patients diagnosed with BTC from January 1987 to July 2013 and treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto were analyzed. The differences in treatment patterns between older and younger patients were explored and the impact of age, patient and disease characteristics on survival outcomes was assessed.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twenty one patients ≥ 70 years were identified. Older patients were more likely to receive best supportive care, 40% (n = 130), compared to younger patients 26% (n = 154); p < 0.0001. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with receipt of surgery included stage I/II disease (p < 0.0001) and ECOG PS < 2 (p < 0.0001). Older age was not associated with lack of surgical intervention. In comparison, older age was associated with non-receipt of palliative chemotherapy (p = 0.0007). Similar survival benefit from treatment was seen in older and younger patients. Of 626 patients that underwent either surgery or palliative chemotherapy (n = 188), the median survival was 21.1 months (95% CI 19.0-27.9) in patients >70 years of age, and 21.1 months in younger patients (n = 438) (95% CI 19.5-24.5).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large retrospective analysis, older patients with BTC are less likely to undergo an intervention. However, active therapy when given is associated with similar survival benefits, irrespective of age.

摘要

背景

尽管胆道癌(BTC)在老年人群中很常见,但该人群的治疗方法和治疗结果尚未得到充分研究。

患者与方法

分析了1987年1月至2013年7月在多伦多玛格丽特公主癌症中心诊断为BTC并接受治疗的913例患者的数据。探讨了老年患者和年轻患者治疗模式的差异,并评估了年龄、患者和疾病特征对生存结果的影响。

结果

确定了321例年龄≥70岁的患者。老年患者更有可能接受最佳支持治疗,比例为40%(n = 130),而年轻患者为26%(n = 154);p < 0.0001。多变量分析显示,与接受手术相关的因素包括I/II期疾病(p < 0.0001)和东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分<2(p < 0.0001)。年龄较大与未进行手术干预无关。相比之下,年龄较大与未接受姑息化疗相关(p = 0.0007)。老年患者和年轻患者从治疗中获得的生存益处相似。在626例接受手术或姑息化疗的患者中(n = 188),年龄>70岁患者的中位生存期为21.1个月(95%置信区间19.0 - 27.9),年轻患者(n = 438)为21.1个月(95%置信区间19.5 - 24.5)。

结论

在这项大型回顾性分析中,老年BTC患者接受干预的可能性较小。然而,无论年龄大小,积极治疗均与相似的生存益处相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d1f/4792607/9e9e1551318f/oncotarget-06-44995-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d1f/4792607/2d6b8316ea85/oncotarget-06-44995-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d1f/4792607/9e9e1551318f/oncotarget-06-44995-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d1f/4792607/2d6b8316ea85/oncotarget-06-44995-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d1f/4792607/9e9e1551318f/oncotarget-06-44995-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Patterns of care and treatment outcomes in older patients with biliary tract cancer.老年胆道癌患者的护理模式及治疗结果
Oncotarget. 2015 Dec 29;6(42):44995-5004. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5707.
2
Elderly patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) receive less treatment irrespective of performance score or comorbidity - A retrospective multicentre study in a large cohort of GIST patients.老年胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者无论其体能状态评分或合并症如何,接受的治疗都较少——一项对大量GIST患者队列的回顾性多中心研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:318-325. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.017. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
3
Management and Outcome of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases in Elderly Patients: A Population-Based Study.老年患者结直肠癌肝转移的管理与预后:一项基于人群的研究。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1111-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2943.
4
Trends in Gender Differences in Cardiac Care and Outcome After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Western Sweden: A Report From the Swedish Web System for Enhancement of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART).瑞典西部急性心肌梗死后心脏护理与预后的性别差异趋势:来自瑞典心脏病循证护理强化网络系统(SWEDEHEART)的报告,该系统根据推荐疗法进行评估
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jul 14;4(7):e001995. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001995.
5
Older adults with biliary tract cancer: treatment and prognosis.老年胆道癌患者:治疗与预后。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Oct;60(10):1862-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04163.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
6
Radical Cystectomy Chemoradiation for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Impact of Treatment Facility and Sociodemographics.根治性膀胱切除术联合放化疗治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌:治疗机构及社会人口统计学特征的影响
Anticancer Res. 2017 Oct;37(10):5603-5608. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11994.
7
Prognostic factors and long-term outcomes of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single-institution experience in China.肝门部胆管癌的预后因素及长期结局:中国单中心经验
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 28;22(8):2601-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i8.2601.
8
Initial Trends in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Patients With Breast Cancer in the Medicare Population, 2005-2009.2005-2009 年 Medicare 人群中乳腺癌患者使用 21 基因复发评分检测的初始趋势。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 May;1(2):158-66. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.43.
9
Geographic disparities in surgical treatment recommendation patterns and survival for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.胰腺腺癌手术治疗推荐模式和生存率的地域差异。
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Nov;19(11):1008-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
10
Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in biliary tract cancer.中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值作为胆道癌的预后因素。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jun;50(9):1581-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of monotherapy and combination therapy for older patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a retrospective study.老年晚期胆管癌患者单药治疗与联合治疗的比较:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 9;25(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14014-1.
2
Cholangiocarcinoma, sequential chemotherapy, and prognostic tests.胆管癌、序贯化疗和预后检测。
Front Oncol. 2024 Jun 24;14:1361420. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1361420. eCollection 2024.
3
Real-world experience supporting the role of oncologic resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in biliary tract cancers.

本文引用的文献

1
Intestinal-type of differentiation predicts favourable overall survival: confirmatory clinicopathological analysis of 198 periampullary adenocarcinomas of pancreatic, biliary, ampullary and duodenal origin.肠型分化预示着良好的总生存期:对198例胰腺、胆管、壶腹和十二指肠来源的壶腹周围腺癌的验证性临床病理分析。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Sep 22;13:428. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-428.
2
Comparative outcomes of elderly and non-elderly patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer.老年和非老年晚期胆管癌患者接受一线姑息化疗的比较结果。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;29(2):403-8. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12338.
3
支持肿瘤切除和辅助化疗在胆道癌中作用的真实世界经验。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Apr 15;16:17588359241247008. doi: 10.1177/17588359241247008. eCollection 2024.
4
A Practical Guide for the Systemic Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer in Canada.加拿大胆道癌系统治疗实用指南。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jul 25;30(8):7132-7150. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30080517.
5
Temporal Trends of Stages and Survival of Biliary Tract Cancers in the United States and Associations with Demographic Factors.美国胆道癌的分期和生存的时间趋势及其与人口统计学因素的关系。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Nov 1;32(11):1660-1667. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0562.
6
Genomic profiling, prognosis, and potential interventional targets in young and old patients with cholangiocarcinoma.老年和年轻胆管癌患者的基因组分析、预后和潜在干预靶点。
Cancer Biol Ther. 2023 Dec 31;24(1):2223375. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2023.2223375.
7
Second-Line Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study.二线化疗在老年晚期胆道癌患者中的应用:一项多中心真实世界研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 27;58(11):1543. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111543.
8
The clinical outcomes of combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: an exploratory analysis of JCOG1113.JCOG1113 探索性分析:老年晚期胆道癌患者联合化疗的临床结局。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 19;12(1):987. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04550-8.
9
Describing Treatment Patterns for Elderly Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Predicting Prognosis by a Validated Model: A Population-Based Study.描述肝内胆管癌老年患者的治疗模式并通过验证模型预测预后:一项基于人群的研究
J Cancer. 2021 Mar 30;12(11):3114-3125. doi: 10.7150/jca.53978. eCollection 2021.
10
A review of systemic therapy in biliary tract carcinoma.胆管癌全身治疗综述
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Aug;11(4):770-789. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-203.
Cancer statistics, 2013.
癌症统计数据,2013 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
4
Relevance of a systematic geriatric screening and assessment in older patients with cancer: results of a prospective multicentric study.老年癌症患者进行系统老年综合评估的相关性:一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
Ann Oncol. 2013 May;24(5):1306-12. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds619. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
5
Older adults with biliary tract cancer: treatment and prognosis.老年胆道癌患者:治疗与预后。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Oct;60(10):1862-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04163.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
6
Predicting the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older patients: the Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients (CRASH) score.预测老年患者化疗毒性的风险:高龄患者化疗风险评估量表 (CRASH) 评分。
Cancer. 2012 Jul 1;118(13):3377-86. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26646. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
7
Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study.预测老年癌症患者的化疗毒性:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;29(25):3457-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.7625. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
8
Single-agent gemcitabine in elderly patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer.老年不可切除胆管癌患者使用单药吉西他滨治疗
Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Mar-Apr;58(106):270-4.
9
Impact and feasibility of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in the oncology setting: a pilot study.综合老年评估在肿瘤治疗中的影响和可行性:一项试点研究。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug;35(4):322-8. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318210f9ce.
10
Lessons from the comparison of two randomized clinical trials using gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer.吉西他滨和顺铂治疗晚期胆道癌的两项随机临床试验比较的启示。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011 Oct;80(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.10.009. Epub 2010 Nov 19.