Suppr超能文献

心脏骤停后患者降温的适宜温度是多少?

What is the right temperature to cool post-cardiac arrest patients?

作者信息

Chandrasekaran Premkumar Nattanmai, Dezfulian Cameron, Polderman Kees H

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2015 Nov 18;19:406. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1134-z.

Abstract

CITATION

Niklas Nielsen, Wetterslev J, Cronberg T, Erlinge D, Gasche Y, Hassager C, Horn J, Hovdenes J, Kjaergaard J, Kuiper M, Pellis T, Stammet P, Wanscher M, Wise MP, Åneman A, Al-Subaie N, Boesgaard S, Bro-Jeppesen J, Brunetti I, Bugge JF, Hingston CD, Juffermans NP, Koopmans M, Køber L, Langørgen J, Lilja G, Møller JE, Rundgren M, Rylander C, Smid O, Werer C, Winkel P, Friberg H. Targeted temperature management at 33 °C versus 36 °C after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2197-206. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310519 . Epub 2013 Nov 17. Pub Med PMID: 20089970.

BACKGROUND

Brain ischemia and reperfusion injury leading to tissue degeneration and loss of neurological function following return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest (CA) is a well-known entity. Two landmark trials in 2002 showed improved survival and neurological outcome of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of presumed cardiac origin when the patients were subjected to therapeutic hypothermia of 32 to 34 °C for 12 to 24 hours. However, the optimal target temperature for these cohorts is yet to be established and also it is not clear whether strict fever management and maintaining near normal body temperature are alone sufficient to improve the outcome.

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to determine whether a hypothermic goal of a near-normal body temperature of 36 °C reduces all-cause mortality compared with a moderate hypothermia of 33 °C for the unconscious survivors of OHCA of presumed cardiac origin when subjected randomly to these different targeted temperatures.

DESIGN

A multicenter, international, open label, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Thirty-six ICUs in Europe and Australia participated in this study.

PARTICIPANTS

Unconscious adults (older than 18 years of age) who survived (Glasgow coma scale less than 8) OHCA due to presumed cardiac origin with subsequent persistent return of spontaneous circulation (more than 20 minutes without chest compressions).

INTERVENTION

The above participant cohorts were randomized to targeted body temperature of either 33 °C or 36 °C for 36 hours after the CA with gradual rewarming of both groups to 37 °C (hourly increments of 0.5 °C) after the initial 28 hours. Body temperatures in both the groups were then maintained below 37.5 °C for 72 hours after the initial 36 hours.

OUTCOMES

Primary outcome measure of all-cause mortality in both the groups at the end of the trial with the secondary outcome measure of all-cause mortality, composite neurological function as evaluated by cerebral performance category scale and modified ranking scale at the end of 180 days were studied.

RESULTS

Out of the 939 participants, all-cause mortality at the end of the trial was 50 % in the 33 °C group (225 of 466 patients) compared with 48 % in the 36 °C group (235 of 473 patients); the hazard ratio with a temperature of 33 °C was 1.06 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.28, P = 0.51). At the end of 180 days, 54 % of patients in the 33 °C group versus 52 % in the 36 °C group had died or had poor neurological outcome according to cerebral performance category (risk ratio 1.02, 95 % CI 0.88 to 1.16, P = 0.78) but the modified ranking scale at the end of 180 days was unchanged (52 %) in both groups (risk ratio 1.01, 95 % CI 0.89 to 1.14, P = 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Maintaining targeted lower normothermia of 36 °C had similar outcomes compared with induced moderate hypothermia of 33 °C for unconscious survivors of OHCA of presumed cardiac cause.

摘要

引用文献

尼克拉斯·尼尔森、韦特斯莱夫、克伦伯格、埃林格、加舍、哈萨格、霍恩、霍夫德内斯、凯耶gaard、奎珀、佩利斯、斯塔梅特、万舍尔、怀斯、安内曼、阿尔 - 苏拜、博斯加德、布罗 - 耶佩森、布鲁内蒂、布格、欣斯顿、尤弗曼斯、库普曼斯、克伯、朗厄根、利尔亚、莫勒、伦德格伦、赖兰德、斯米德、韦勒、温克尔、弗里贝里。心脏骤停后33°C与36°C的目标温度管理。《新英格兰医学杂志》。2013年;369:2197 - 206。doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1310519。2013年11月17日在线发表。PubMed PMID:20089970。

背景

心脏骤停(CA)后自主循环恢复后,脑缺血再灌注损伤导致组织变性和神经功能丧失是一个众所周知的现象。2002年的两项具有里程碑意义的试验表明,院外心脏骤停(OHCA)推测为心源性的昏迷幸存者,若接受32至34°C的治疗性低温12至24小时,其生存率和神经功能结局会得到改善。然而,这些人群的最佳目标温度尚未确定,而且严格的发热管理和维持接近正常体温是否足以改善结局也不清楚。

目的

目的是确定对于推测为心源性OHCA的昏迷幸存者,随机接受不同目标温度时,与33°C的中度低温相比,接近正常体温36°C的低温目标是否能降低全因死亡率。

设计

一项多中心、国际、开放标签、随机对照试验。

地点

欧洲和澳大利亚的36个重症监护病房参与了本研究。

参与者

因推测为心源性OHCA存活(格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分小于8)且随后自主循环持续恢复(无胸外按压超过20分钟)的18岁以上昏迷成年人。

干预

上述参与者队列在心脏骤停后被随机分配至目标体温33°C或36°C,持续36小时,两组在最初28小时后均以每小时0.5°C的速度逐渐复温至37°C。在最初36小时后,两组体温在接下来的72小时内维持在37.5°C以下。

结局

研究了试验结束时两组的全因死亡率这一主要结局指标,以及180天结束时全因死亡率、通过脑功能类别量表和改良秩和量表评估的综合神经功能这一次要结局指标。

结果

在939名参与者中,试验结束时33°C组的全因死亡率为50%(466例患者中的225例),而36°C组为48%(47总3例患者中的235例);33°C时的风险比为1.06((95%)置信区间(CI)0.89至1.28,(P = 0.51))。在180天结束时,根据脑功能类别,33°C组54%的患者与36°C组52%的患者死亡或神经功能结局不佳(风险比1.02,(95%)CI 0.88至1.16,(P = 0.78)),但两组在180天结束时改良秩和量表结果无变化(均为52%)(风险比1.01,(95%)CI 0.89至1.14,(P = 0.87))。

结论

对于推测为心源性OHCA的昏迷幸存者,维持目标低温36°C与诱导中度低温33°C的结局相似。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Hypothermia for neuroprotection in adults after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.心肺复苏后成人低温神经保护治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD004128. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004128.pub3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验