Vernon David, Lowe Robert, Thill Serge, Ziemke Tom
Interaction Lab, School of Informatics, University of Skövde Skövde, Sweden.
Interaction Lab, School of Informatics, University of Skövde Skövde, Sweden ; Division of Cognition and Communication, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 30;6:1660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01660. eCollection 2015.
The reciprocal coupling of perception and action in cognitive agents has been firmly established: perceptions guide action but so too do actions influence what is perceived. While much has been said on the implications of this for the agent's external behavior, less attention has been paid to what it means for the internal bodily mechanisms which underpin cognitive behavior. In this article, we wish to redress this by reasserting that the relationship between cognition, perception, and action involves a constitutive element as well as a behavioral element, emphasizing that the reciprocal link between perception and action in cognition merits a renewed focus on the system dynamics inherent in constitutive biological autonomy. Our argument centers on the idea that cognition, perception, and action are all dependent on processes focussed primarily on the maintenance of the agent's autonomy. These processes have an inherently circular nature-self-organizing, self-producing, and self-maintaining-and our goal is to explore these processes and suggest how they can explain the reciprocity of perception and action. Specifically, we argue that the reciprocal coupling is founded primarily on their endogenous roles in the constitutive autonomy of the agent and an associated circular causality of global and local processes of self-regulation, rather than being a mutual sensory-motor contingency that derives from exogenous behavior. Furthermore, the coupling occurs first and foremost via the internal milieu realized by the agent's organismic embodiment. Finally, we consider how homeostasis and the related concept of allostasis contribute to this circular self-regulation.
感知引导行动,但行动也会影响所感知的内容。尽管人们对其对主体外部行为的影响已多有论述,但对于支撑认知行为的内部身体机制意味着什么却较少关注。在本文中,我们希望通过重申认知、感知与行动之间的关系涉及构成要素和行为要素来纠正这一点,强调认知中感知与行动之间的相互联系值得重新关注构成性生物自主性中固有的系统动力学。我们的论点集中在这样一个观点上,即认知、感知和行动都依赖于主要专注于维持主体自主性的过程。这些过程具有内在的循环性质——自我组织、自我产生和自我维持——我们的目标是探索这些过程,并提出它们如何能够解释感知与行动的相互性。具体而言,我们认为这种相互耦合主要基于它们在主体构成性自主性中的内生作用以及自我调节的全局和局部过程的相关循环因果关系,而不是源于外生行为的相互感觉运动偶联。此外,这种耦合首先通过主体有机体体现所实现的内部环境发生。最后,我们考虑稳态和相关的应变稳态概念如何促成这种循环自我调节。