• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于急性胰腺炎修订版亚特兰大分类的决策树模型预测重症急性胰腺炎

Prediction of Severe Acute Pancreatitis Using a Decision Tree Model Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification of Acute Pancreatitis.

作者信息

Yang Zhiyong, Dong Liming, Zhang Yushun, Yang Chong, Gou Shanmiao, Li Yongfeng, Xiong Jiongxin, Wu Heshui, Wang Chunyou

机构信息

Pancreatic Disease Institute, Department of General Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.

Organ Transplantation Center, Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0143486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143486. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0143486
PMID:26580397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4651493/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a model for the early prediction of severe acute pancreatitis based on the revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

Clinical data of 1308 patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) were included in the retrospective study. A total of 603 patients who were admitted to the hospital within 36 hours of the onset of the disease were included at last according to the inclusion criteria. The clinical data were collected within 12 hours after admission. All the patients were classified as having mild acute pancreatitis (MAP), moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) based on the revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis. All the 603 patients were randomly divided into training group (402 cases) and test group (201 cases). Univariate and multiple regression analyses were used to identify the independent risk factors for the development of SAP in the training group. Then the prediction model was constructed using the decision tree method, and this model was applied to the test group to evaluate its validity.

RESULTS

The decision tree model was developed using creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, and oxygenation index to predict SAP. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of SAP in the training group were 80.9% and 90.0%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity in the test group were 88.6% and 90.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision tree model based on creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase, and oxygenation index is more likely to predict the occurrence of SAP.

摘要

目的

基于修订后的急性胰腺炎亚特兰大分类法,建立一种用于早期预测重症急性胰腺炎的模型。

方法

回顾性研究纳入1308例急性胰腺炎(AP)患者的临床资料。最终根据纳入标准,纳入发病36小时内入院的603例患者。入院后12小时内收集临床资料。根据修订后的急性胰腺炎亚特兰大分类法,将所有患者分为轻症急性胰腺炎(MAP)、中度重症急性胰腺炎(MSAP)和重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)。将603例患者随机分为训练组(402例)和测试组(201例)。采用单因素和多因素回归分析确定训练组中发生SAP的独立危险因素。然后采用决策树方法构建预测模型,并将该模型应用于测试组以评估其有效性。

结果

利用肌酐、乳酸脱氢酶和氧合指数建立决策树模型来预测SAP。训练组中SAP的诊断敏感性和特异性分别为80.9%和90.0%,测试组中的敏感性和特异性分别为88.6%和90.4%。

结论

基于肌酐、乳酸脱氢酶和氧合指数的决策树模型更有可能预测SAP的发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d38/4651493/1278107f82fa/pone.0143486.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d38/4651493/59801bf8da61/pone.0143486.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d38/4651493/6f26419b4ee0/pone.0143486.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d38/4651493/88d029b7f1ae/pone.0143486.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d38/4651493/1278107f82fa/pone.0143486.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d38/4651493/59801bf8da61/pone.0143486.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d38/4651493/6f26419b4ee0/pone.0143486.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d38/4651493/88d029b7f1ae/pone.0143486.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d38/4651493/1278107f82fa/pone.0143486.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of Severe Acute Pancreatitis Using a Decision Tree Model Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification of Acute Pancreatitis.基于急性胰腺炎修订版亚特兰大分类的决策树模型预测重症急性胰腺炎
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0143486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143486. eCollection 2015.
2
The revised Atlanta criteria 2012 altered the classification, severity assessment and management of acute pancreatitis.2012年修订的亚特兰大标准改变了急性胰腺炎的分类、严重程度评估及管理。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2016 Jun;15(3):310-5. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(15)60040-6.
3
Prospective Validation of a Decision Tree Model for Prediction of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis.
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018 Jul 4;16(2):239-244.
4
Risk Factors for Worsening of Acute Pancreatitis in Patients Admitted with Mild Acute Pancreatitis.轻度急性胰腺炎入院患者急性胰腺炎病情恶化的危险因素
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Feb 26;23:1026-1032. doi: 10.12659/msm.900383.
5
Prediction of severe acute pancreatitis using classification and regression tree analysis.采用分类回归树分析预测重症急性胰腺炎。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Dec;56(12):3664-71. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1849-x. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
6
Comparison of Predictive Systems in Severe Acute Pancreatitis According to the Revised Atlanta Classification.根据修订后的亚特兰大分类法对重症急性胰腺炎预测系统的比较
Pancreas. 2016 Jan;45(1):46-50. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000433.
7
Early Prediction of the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis Using Radiologic and Clinical Scoring Systems With Classification Tree Analysis.基于分类树分析的影像学和临床评分系统对急性胰腺炎严重程度的早期预测。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):1035-1043. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19545. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
8
Neutrophil-Creatinine Index: A New Prognostic Factor for Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.中性粒细胞-肌酐指数:急性胰腺炎严重程度的一个新的预后因素。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 6;60(4):607. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040607.
9
[The comparison of the 1992 and 2012 Atlanta classifications for assessing disease severity in patients with acute pancreatitis].[1992年与2012年亚特兰大分类法在评估急性胰腺炎患者疾病严重程度方面的比较]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jan;55(1):21-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2016.01.006.
10
Plasma D-Dimer Level Is an Early Predictor of Severity of Acute Pancreatitis Based on 2012 Atlanta Classification.基于 2012 年亚特兰大分类,血浆 D-二聚体水平是急性胰腺炎严重程度的早期预测指标。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Nov 27;25:9019-9027. doi: 10.12659/MSM.918311.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood urea nitrogen to albumin ratio as predictor of mortality among acute pancreatitis patients in ICU: A retrospective cohort study.血尿素氮与白蛋白比值作为重症监护病房急性胰腺炎患者死亡率的预测指标:一项回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2025 May 15;20(5):e0323321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323321. eCollection 2025.
2
Association between serum creatinine-to-albumin ratio and 28-day mortality in intensive care unit patients following cardiac surgery: analysis of mimic-iv data.心脏手术后重症监护病房患者血清肌酐与白蛋白比值与28天死亡率的关联:MIMIC-IV数据的分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Feb 14;25(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04505-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Value of BISAP Score for Predicting Mortality and Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.BISAP评分对预测急性胰腺炎死亡率和严重程度的价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 19;10(6):e0130412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130412. eCollection 2015.
2
Revised Atlanta and determinant-based classification: application in a prospective cohort of acute pancreatitis patients.修订后的亚特兰大分类和基于判定因素的分类:在急性胰腺炎患者前瞻性队列中的应用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec;108(12):1911-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.348. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
3
Validation of the determinant-based classification and revision of the Atlanta classification systems for acute pancreatitis.
A deep learning-powered diagnostic model for acute pancreatitis.
基于深度学习的急性胰腺炎诊断模型。
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Jun 20;24(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01339-9.
4
Diagnostic utility of HFLC% and IG% for acute Pancreatitis-A retrospective Case-Control study.HFLC%和IG%对急性胰腺炎的诊断效用——一项回顾性病例对照研究
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 23;10(9):e30031. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30031. eCollection 2024 May 15.
5
Association between serum creatinine to albumin ratio and short- and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to the intensive care unit: a retrospective analysis based on the MIMIC-IV database.血清肌酐与白蛋白比值与 ICU 收治的急性胰腺炎患者短期和长期全因死亡率的关系:基于 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性分析。
Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 15;15:1373371. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1373371. eCollection 2024.
6
Predictive value of machine learning for the severity of acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习对急性胰腺炎严重程度的预测价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 15;10(8):e29603. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29603. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
7
Development and internal validation of a practical model to predict 30 days mortality of severe acute pancreatitis patients.开发并内部验证一种实用模型,以预测重症急性胰腺炎患者 30 天死亡率。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2236648. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2236648.
8
Development of a Novel Nomogram Incorporating Red Blood Cell Distribution Width-Albumin Ratio for the Prediction of 30-day Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis Patients.一种纳入红细胞分布宽度-白蛋白比值的新型列线图用于预测急性胰腺炎患者30天死亡率的研究进展
Emerg Med Int. 2022 Nov 28;2022:1573931. doi: 10.1155/2022/1573931. eCollection 2022.
9
Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase Is a Sensitive Predictor of Systemic Complications of Acute Pancreatitis.血清乳酸脱氢酶是急性胰腺炎全身并发症的敏感预测指标。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022 Oct 25;2022:1131235. doi: 10.1155/2022/1131235. eCollection 2022.
10
Volume, but Not the Location of Necrosis, Is Associated with Worse Outcomes in Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Study.容量而非坏死位置与急性胰腺炎的不良结局相关:一项前瞻性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 May 8;58(5):645. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050645.
基于分类的判定标准的确证和急性胰腺炎亚特兰大分类系统的修订。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;12(2):311-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.042. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
4
American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis.美国胃肠病学会指南:急性胰腺炎的管理。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;108(9):1400-15; 1416. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
5
Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus.急性胰腺炎的分类-2012:亚特兰大分类修订和国际共识定义。
Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
6
Epidemiology of first-attack acute pancreatitis in Taiwan from 2000 through 2009: a nationwide population-based study.2000 年至 2009 年台湾首次发作急性胰腺炎的流行病学:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Pancreas. 2012 Jul;41(5):696-702. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31823db941.
7
Prediction of severe acute pancreatitis using classification and regression tree analysis.采用分类回归树分析预测重症急性胰腺炎。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Dec;56(12):3664-71. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1849-x. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
8
Nationwide epidemiological survey of acute pancreatitis in Japan.日本全国范围内的急性胰腺炎流行病学调查。
Pancreas. 2011 May;40(4):503-7. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318214812b.
9
Incidence, resource use, and outcome of acute pancreatitis with/without intensive care: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.伴有/不伴有重症监护的急性胰腺炎的发病率、资源利用和结局:台湾一项全国基于人群的研究。
Pancreas. 2011 Jan;40(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181f7e750.
10
The role of alcohol and smoking in pancreatitis.酒精和吸烟在胰腺炎中的作用。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Mar;7(3):131-45. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.6. Epub 2010 Feb 2.