• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年公民对社交机器人的态度转变:人格特质和对机器人功能信念的作用。

Attitudinal Change in Elderly Citizens Toward Social Robots: The Role of Personality Traits and Beliefs About Robot Functionality.

作者信息

Damholdt Malene F, Nørskov Marco, Yamazaki Ryuji, Hakli Raul, Hansen Catharina Vesterager, Vestergaard Christina, Seibt Johanna

机构信息

Department of Philosophy and the History of Ideas, School of Culture and Society, Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark ; Unit for Psychooncology and Health Psychology, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital and Department of Psychology & Behavioural Science, Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Philosophy and the History of Ideas, School of Culture and Society, Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark ; Hiroshi Ishiguro Laboratories, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 20;6:1701. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01701. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01701
PMID:26635646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4653284/
Abstract

Attitudes toward robots influence the tendency to accept or reject robotic devices. Thus it is important to investigate whether and how attitudes toward robots can change. In this pilot study we investigate attitudinal changes in elderly citizens toward a tele-operated robot in relation to three parameters: (i) the information provided about robot functionality, (ii) the number of encounters, (iii) personality type. Fourteen elderly residents at a rehabilitation center participated. Pre-encounter attitudes toward robots, anthropomorphic thinking, and personality were assessed. Thereafter the participants interacted with a tele-operated robot (Telenoid) during their lunch (c. 30 min.) for up to 3 days. Half of the participants were informed that the robot was tele-operated (IC) whilst the other half were naïve to its functioning (UC). Post-encounter assessments of attitudes toward robots and anthropomorphic thinking were undertaken to assess change. Attitudes toward robots were assessed with a new generic 35-items questionnaire (attitudes toward social robots scale: ASOR-5), offering a differentiated conceptualization of the conditions for social interaction. There was no significant difference between the IC and UC groups in attitude change toward robots though trends were observed. Personality was correlated with some tendencies for attitude changes; Extraversion correlated with positive attitude changes to intimate-personal relatedness with the robot (r = 0.619) and to psychological relatedness (r = 0.581) whilst Neuroticism correlated negatively (r = -0.582) with mental relatedness with the robot. The results tentatively suggest that neither information about functionality nor direct repeated encounters are pivotal in changing attitudes toward robots in elderly citizens. This may reflect a cognitive congruence bias where the robot is experienced in congruence with initial attitudes, or it may support action-based explanations of cognitive dissonance reductions, given that robots, unlike computers, are not yet perceived as action targets. Specific personality traits may be indicators of attitude change relating to specific domains of social interaction. Implications and future directions are discussed.

摘要

对机器人的态度会影响接受或拒绝机器人设备的倾向。因此,研究对机器人的态度是否以及如何改变很重要。在这项初步研究中,我们调查了老年公民对远程操作机器人的态度变化与三个参数的关系:(i)提供的关于机器人功能的信息,(ii)接触次数,(iii)性格类型。一家康复中心的14名老年居民参与了研究。在接触前评估了对机器人的态度、拟人化思维和性格。此后,参与者在午餐期间(约30分钟)与一个远程操作机器人(Telenoid)互动,为期最多3天。一半的参与者被告知机器人是远程操作的(信息组),而另一半对其功能一无所知(无信息组)。在接触后评估了对机器人的态度和拟人化思维,以评估变化情况。使用一份新的通用35项问卷(对社交机器人态度量表:ASOR-5)评估对机器人的态度,该问卷提供了对社交互动条件的差异化概念化。信息组和无信息组在对机器人态度变化方面没有显著差异,不过观察到了一些趋势。性格与一些态度变化倾向相关;外向性与对与机器人亲密个人关系的积极态度变化(r = 0.619)以及心理关系的积极态度变化(r = 0.581)相关,而神经质与与机器人的心理关系呈负相关(r = -0.582)。结果初步表明,无论是关于功能的信息还是直接的重复接触,在改变老年公民对机器人的态度方面都不是关键因素。这可能反映了一种认知一致性偏差,即机器人的体验与初始态度一致,或者它可能支持基于行动的认知失调减少解释,因为与计算机不同,机器人尚未被视为行动目标。特定的性格特征可能是与社交互动特定领域相关的态度变化指标。讨论了研究结果的意义和未来方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2a/4653284/dfdd779f2f23/fpsyg-06-01701-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2a/4653284/b8aad73b8f38/fpsyg-06-01701-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2a/4653284/c7f1a3311f20/fpsyg-06-01701-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2a/4653284/dfdd779f2f23/fpsyg-06-01701-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2a/4653284/b8aad73b8f38/fpsyg-06-01701-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2a/4653284/c7f1a3311f20/fpsyg-06-01701-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2a/4653284/dfdd779f2f23/fpsyg-06-01701-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Attitudinal Change in Elderly Citizens Toward Social Robots: The Role of Personality Traits and Beliefs About Robot Functionality.老年公民对社交机器人的态度转变:人格特质和对机器人功能信念的作用。
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 20;6:1701. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01701. eCollection 2015.
2
The Relationship Between Extroversion and the Tendency to Anthropomorphize Robots: A Bayesian Analysis.外向性与将机器人拟人化倾向之间的关系:一项贝叶斯分析。
Front Robot AI. 2019 Jan 9;5:135. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00135. eCollection 2018.
3
Anthropomorphism of Robots: Study of Appearance and Agency.机器人拟人化:外观与能动性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 May 10;6(2):e12629. doi: 10.2196/12629.
4
Attitudes and reactions to a healthcare robot.对医疗机器人的态度和反应。
Telemed J E Health. 2010 Jun;16(5):608-13. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0171.
5
Our Robots, Our Team: Robot Anthropomorphism Moderates Group Effects in Human-Robot Teams.我们的机器人,我们的团队:机器人拟人化对人机团队中的群体效应有调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 14;11:1275. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01275. eCollection 2020.
6
Does the Correspondence Bias Apply to Social Robots?: Dispositional and Situational Attributions of Human Versus Robot Behavior.对应偏差是否适用于社交机器人?:对人类与机器人行为的特质归因和情境归因。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Jan 4;8:788242. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.788242. eCollection 2021.
7
Heterogeneity of Attitudes toward Robots in Healthcare among the Chinese Public: A Latent Profile Analysis.公众对医疗保健机器人态度的异质性:潜在剖面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 28;20(1):508. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010508.
8
More Than a Feeling-Interrelation of Trust Layers in Human-Robot Interaction and the Role of User Dispositions and State Anxiety.不止是一种感觉——人机交互中信任层次的相互关系以及用户性格和状态焦虑的作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 12;12:592711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.592711. eCollection 2021.
9
Robots Are Not All the Same: Young Adults' Expectations, Attitudes, and Mental Attribution to Two Humanoid Social Robots.机器人并非千篇一律:年轻人对两款人形社交机器人的期望、态度和心理归因。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 May;24(5):307-314. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0162. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
10
Acceptance and Attitudes Toward a Human-like Socially Assistive Robot by Older Adults.老年人对类人社交辅助机器人的接受度和态度
Assist Technol. 2014 Fall;26(3):140-50. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2013.869703.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved Glycemic Control through Robot-Assisted Remote Interview for Outpatients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Study.通过机器人辅助远程访谈改善 2 型糖尿病门诊患者的血糖控制:一项试点研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 15;60(2):329. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020329.
2
Technology Assisted Rehabilitation Patient Perception Questionnaire (TARPP-Q): development and implementation of an instrument to evaluate patients' perception during training.技术辅助康复患者感知问卷(TARPP-Q):一种评估患者训练期间感知的工具的开发和实施。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Mar 24;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01146-3.
3
Does the Personality of Consumers Influence the Assessment of the Experience of Interaction with Social Robots?

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults.年轻人和老年人对家用机器人的态度和意向性接受情况。
Univers Access Hum Comput Interact (2009). 2009;5615:39-48. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_5.
2
OLDER ADULTS' PREFERENCES FOR AND ACCEPTANCE OF ROBOT ASSISTANCE FOR EVERYDAY LIVING TASKS.老年人对日常生活任务中机器人协助的偏好与接受度
Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2012 Sep;56(1):153-157. doi: 10.1177/1071181312561009.
3
Who Sees Human? The Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism.
消费者的个性会影响对与社交机器人互动体验的评估吗?
Int J Soc Robot. 2022 Oct 9:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12369-022-00935-5.
4
Technology Acceptance in Socially Assistive Robots: Scoping Review of Models, Measurement, and Influencing Factors.社交媒体机器人技术接受度:模型、测量和影响因素的范围综述。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jul 22;2022:6334732. doi: 10.1155/2022/6334732. eCollection 2022.
5
A Systematic Review of Human and Robot Personality in Health Care Human-Robot Interaction.医疗保健人机交互中人类与机器人个性的系统评价
Front Robot AI. 2021 Sep 17;8:748246. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.748246. eCollection 2021.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of social robots for older adults and people with dementia: a scoping review.社会机器人在老年人和痴呆症患者中的应用障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jun 9;21(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02277-9.
7
How Prefrail Older People Living Alone Perceive Information and Communications Technology and What They Would Ask a Robot for: Qualitative Study.独居的衰弱前期老年人如何看待信息通信技术以及他们会向机器人提出什么请求:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 6;21(8):e13228. doi: 10.2196/13228.
8
Social robotics and the modulation of social perception and bias.社会机器人与社会知觉和偏见的调节。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Apr 29;374(1771):20180037. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0037.
9
Assessment of Perceived Attractiveness, Usability, and Societal Impact of a Multimodal Robotic Assistant for Aging Patients With Memory Impairments.对一款针对患有记忆障碍的老年患者的多模态机器人助手的感知吸引力、可用性及社会影响的评估。
Front Neurol. 2018 Jun 1;9:392. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00392. eCollection 2018.
10
Socially Assistive Robots: Measuring Older Adults' Perceptions.社交辅助机器人:衡量老年人的认知
J Gerontol Nurs. 2017 Dec 1;43(12):35-43. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20170707-04. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
谁能洞察人性?拟人化中个体差异的稳定性与重要性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 May;5(3):219-32. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369336.
4
The Attitudes and Perceptions of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment Toward an Assistive Robot.轻度认知障碍老年人对辅助机器人的态度和认知
J Appl Gerontol. 2016 Jan;35(1):3-17. doi: 10.1177/0733464813515092. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
5
Using Effect Size-or Why the P Value Is Not Enough.使用效应量——为何P值并不足够。
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1.
6
Implicit and explicit processes in social cognition.社会认知中的内隐和外显过程。
Neuron. 2008 Nov 6;60(3):503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.032.
7
The qualitative content analysis process.定性内容分析过程。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
8
Let's talk: anthropomorphization as means to cope with stress of interacting with technical devices.我们来探讨一下:将技术设备拟人化作为应对与技术设备交互压力的一种方式。
Ergonomics. 2003;46(13-14):1361-74. doi: 10.1080/00140130310001610883.
9
Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment?多个结果指标需要进行P值调整吗?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002 Jun 17;2:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-8.
10
The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: a quantitative review of longitudinal studies.人格特质从童年到老年的等级顺序一致性:纵向研究的定量综述。
Psychol Bull. 2000 Jan;126(1):3-25. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3.