Benmira A, Perez-Martin A, Schuster I, Aichoun I, Coudray S, Bereksi-Reguig F, Dauzat M
a Vascular Medicine and Laboratory , Nimes University Hospital, Montpellier University , Nimes , France.
b Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Technology , Aboubekr Belkaid University , Tlemcen , Algeria.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13(2):179-89. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2016.1128821. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
The auscultatory technique remains the point of reference for the validation of non-invasive blood pressure measurement devices, although the exact origin of the Korotkoff sounds is still debated and comparison with intra-arterial measurement shows limits and pitfalls. Automatic oscillometric devices are now widely used by nurses, physicians, and patients. However, many available devices have not been duly validated. Moreover, they calculate systolic and diastolic blood pressures using undisclosed algorithms. Therefore, these devices are not interchangeable, and their reliability may be questionable in some clinical situations. Nevertheless, oscillometry is increasingly used, beside NIBP, for the assessment of central blood pressure and systemic arterial wall stiffness. Awareness of its limits and causes of error is all the more necessary.
听诊技术仍然是验证无创血压测量设备的参考标准,尽管柯氏音的确切起源仍存在争议,并且与动脉内测量的比较显示出局限性和缺陷。自动振荡式设备现在被护士、医生和患者广泛使用。然而,许多现有的设备尚未得到充分验证。此外,它们使用未公开的算法来计算收缩压和舒张压。因此,这些设备不可互换,并且在某些临床情况下其可靠性可能存在疑问。尽管如此,除了无创血压测量外,振荡法越来越多地用于评估中心血压和全身动脉壁僵硬度。因此,更加有必要了解其局限性和误差原因。